|
Also, I didn't think Plexa played mafia... and I just checked. Plexa has 0 posts in the TL Mafia subforum. WTF is going on?
|
Bleh, I had a conspiracy theory about how it was Palmar who gave out the nukes, but never mind. Plexa is in the database. Played 3 games about a billion years ago. However, I don't see any nukes in his filters.
|
I don't really see how nukes and bans are the same thing. But this whole line of thought is pointless.
Vivax is Toad, or has been roleplaying Toad all game as a rather clever disguise. That makes him not-Plexa and not where the missiles originated.
##unvote
|
/facepalm
Anyway, I don't know why we are speculating about the nuke being real. If it is, we kill Foolishness. If it isn't, we kill Foolishness tomorrow. In the meantime, we should kill someone else.
SS: for a confirmed townie who is hanging around to give us guidance, you are not guiding much. Do you agree with me that Cora is scum? If not, who should we kill today?
|
Facepalm was at Vivax thinking VE's fake list was real.
|
On March 14 2013 03:00 strongandbig wrote:Show nested quote +On March 14 2013 02:59 Acrofales wrote:
/facepalm
Anyway, I don't know why we are speculating about the nuke being real. If it is, we kill Foolishness. If it isn't, we kill Foolishness tomorrow. In the meantime, we should kill someone else.
SS: for a confirmed townie who is hanging around to give us guidance, you are not guiding much. Do you agree with me that Cora is scum? If not, who should we kill today? KP reduction - seems like it makes sense to kill a for-sure scum today
So we waste a day by all sheeping onto Foolishness with no discussion. Lets have the discussion instead and we might net a second scum. There are 4 scum in addition to Foolishness. Don't be lazy.
What do you think of Cora? Do you still think Oats is scum?
|
On March 14 2013 03:05 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On March 14 2013 03:04 Acrofales wrote:On March 14 2013 03:00 strongandbig wrote:On March 14 2013 02:59 Acrofales wrote:
/facepalm
Anyway, I don't know why we are speculating about the nuke being real. If it is, we kill Foolishness. If it isn't, we kill Foolishness tomorrow. In the meantime, we should kill someone else.
SS: for a confirmed townie who is hanging around to give us guidance, you are not guiding much. Do you agree with me that Cora is scum? If not, who should we kill today? KP reduction - seems like it makes sense to kill a for-sure scum today So we waste a day by all sheeping onto Foolishness with no discussion. Lets have the discussion instead and we might net a second scum. There are 4 scum in addition to Foolishness. Don't be lazy. What do you think of Cora? Do you still think Oats is scum? you checked Foolish's meta? the things I posted? still think he's like "nullish"??
Did the post you quoted sound like I still think he's null? You convinced me. You just didn't convince me we should lynch him when there's a nuke flying at his face.
|
On March 14 2013 03:07 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On March 14 2013 03:06 Acrofales wrote:On March 14 2013 03:05 marvellosity wrote:On March 14 2013 03:04 Acrofales wrote:On March 14 2013 03:00 strongandbig wrote:On March 14 2013 02:59 Acrofales wrote:
/facepalm
Anyway, I don't know why we are speculating about the nuke being real. If it is, we kill Foolishness. If it isn't, we kill Foolishness tomorrow. In the meantime, we should kill someone else.
SS: for a confirmed townie who is hanging around to give us guidance, you are not guiding much. Do you agree with me that Cora is scum? If not, who should we kill today? KP reduction - seems like it makes sense to kill a for-sure scum today So we waste a day by all sheeping onto Foolishness with no discussion. Lets have the discussion instead and we might net a second scum. There are 4 scum in addition to Foolishness. Don't be lazy. What do you think of Cora? Do you still think Oats is scum? you checked Foolish's meta? the things I posted? still think he's like "nullish"?? Did the post you quoted sound like I still think he's null? You convinced me. You just didn't convince me we should lynch him when there's a nuke flying at his face. When there's a potential nuke flying at his face, with a message from a very likely scummer telling us the nukes are real. Hiro was right, handing out 3 day KPs as an invention or whatever sounds ridiculously OP.
Yeah, but I think three duds would also be stupid. So one of them is probably real. It's worth waiting and seeing which.
|
If, at the end of the day we aren't any further reaching a consensus (hint: lynch Cora), we can always pile onto Foolishness.
|
@Vivax: I don't think the Yamato wagon is very meaningful, because I still think he's town. Plus, if Foolishness' nuke works, he's dead tonight and THEN you can make your association cases. Especially as I think Cora is scum and Sloosh has a damned good chance of being scum too.
|
On March 14 2013 03:41 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On March 14 2013 03:40 slOosh wrote:
If you honestly think I ruined it I apologize, but I think I brought about a wealth of useful information.
I have ANTI NUKE countermeasures.
Proper discussion of player behavior and actions and justification does not require me to explain further.
Deciding who to lynch of course does, so I'll explain clearly at like, midday or something. So to clarify again, all the nukes are real but you can cancel whichever you choose?
This. Please state clearly: you can choose which nukes are going to land and kill their target? Can you cancel just one? Or any number of them? If you don't cancel, will they kill their target?
|
Sloosh, what have you learned, other than that the thread went nuts?
|
On March 14 2013 03:48 slOosh wrote:Show nested quote +On March 14 2013 03:46 Acrofales wrote:On March 14 2013 03:41 marvellosity wrote:On March 14 2013 03:40 slOosh wrote:
If you honestly think I ruined it I apologize, but I think I brought about a wealth of useful information.
I have ANTI NUKE countermeasures.
Proper discussion of player behavior and actions and justification does not require me to explain further.
Deciding who to lynch of course does, so I'll explain clearly at like, midday or something. So to clarify again, all the nukes are real but you can cancel whichever you choose? This. Please state clearly: you can choose which nukes are going to land and kill their target? Can you cancel just one? Or any number of them? If you don't cancel, will they kill their target? lol. Talk about the people who used the NUKEs and how they responded. I already said multiple times I'll explain, so you don't have to worry about voting stuff, and I don't see how knowing more helps anyone but scum in forming their plan. Also, Show nested quote +On March 13 2013 22:47 Acrofales wrote:
So if the nuke is real, then Yamato dies at the end of the cycle. I think we should leave Foolishness for tomorrow: I see no reason for scum to nuke a scumbuddy right now. If Yamato flips red, then Foolishness is probably town.
How does this make sense?
If yamato is scum, then why would foolish have nuked him? It would be a monumentously stupid thing to do as scum. So if yamato is scum, foolishness isn't. It really is that simple.
|
And I still think the way this power was used did nothing except create chaos. But I don't see why a scum would come out and claim both its use and the countermeasures.
RAAAAGE.
|
On March 14 2013 03:55 slOosh wrote:Show nested quote +On March 14 2013 03:52 Acrofales wrote:On March 14 2013 03:48 slOosh wrote:On March 14 2013 03:46 Acrofales wrote:On March 14 2013 03:41 marvellosity wrote:On March 14 2013 03:40 slOosh wrote:
If you honestly think I ruined it I apologize, but I think I brought about a wealth of useful information.
I have ANTI NUKE countermeasures.
Proper discussion of player behavior and actions and justification does not require me to explain further.
Deciding who to lynch of course does, so I'll explain clearly at like, midday or something. So to clarify again, all the nukes are real but you can cancel whichever you choose? This. Please state clearly: you can choose which nukes are going to land and kill their target? Can you cancel just one? Or any number of them? If you don't cancel, will they kill their target? lol. Talk about the people who used the NUKEs and how they responded. I already said multiple times I'll explain, so you don't have to worry about voting stuff, and I don't see how knowing more helps anyone but scum in forming their plan. Also, On March 13 2013 22:47 Acrofales wrote:
So if the nuke is real, then Yamato dies at the end of the cycle. I think we should leave Foolishness for tomorrow: I see no reason for scum to nuke a scumbuddy right now. If Yamato flips red, then Foolishness is probably town.
How does this make sense? If yamato is scum, then why would foolish have nuked him? It would be a monumentously stupid thing to do as scum. So if yamato is scum, foolishness isn't. It really is that simple. Why wouldn't you lynch Foolishness today?
Because there's a nuke aimed at his head?
|
Oh, my post was from before Xfire's nuke. Yeah. That's also in my filter. Just fucking read. Zzzzzz.
|
You mean now? Or at the time of the post?
|
I didn't assume Foolish would be nuked? I assumed Yamato would be nuked, because Foolish fired a fucking nuke at him.
At first I thought the nuke was fake and Foolish was trolling. Then when the nuke was launched I basically agreed with Supersoft: why just auto-assume Foolish was scum? At the time I wasn't all that convinced yet.
|
Sloosh seemed to be very suspicious of xfire. I see no mention of foolishness or vivax at all in his filter, but he thought yamato was scum, so people agreeing with him might have been town reads. However, he gave a NUKE to AT LEAST one person he had a scumread on, and one person who is either batshit insane, or scum (Vivax).
This needs explaining right now. The more I think about it, the worse this looks.
|
So... ok.
##vote Foolishness
Sloosh wasted a couple of hours, but comes out looking townier and Xfire also looking townier, so I'll call it a win.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
