Personality Mafia 2 - Page 4

On March 10 2013 15:12 Crossfire99 wrote:

Why are you fit to be tied? I ain't dun notin'. You're darn tootin', though, 'bout Ver. That is a cattywumpus post. I figure he got a 20% chance a playin' gainst his win condition, which sure seems suspect.

On March 10 2013 15:29 Crossfire99 wrote:

You must be walkin' on a slant if you think you dun somethin' so far.

On March 11 2013 04:59 Crossfire99 wrote:
Yo, be easy and stop buggin folks. True, dis game be tight, but we don't want dis gettin outta hand and turnin into beef.


Aight, I'mma lay dis down fo yo. Votin for non-alignment reasons be wack. Na mean? Role playin be dope and errbody should be crunk bout it.

On March 11 2013 05:27 Crossfire99 wrote:

Just cause he be fakin jacks don't mean he scum. Role aint got nutin to do wit alignment. Judge 'im on if he bring dat bling (Chez brings da bling when he be from our hood and go off on dem scum). No bling, call da po-po, lock 'im in da joint, and give 'im dat needle.

On March 11 2013 23:33 cDgCorazon wrote:



There were 2 points in the case:

Oats goes after easy targets
Oats gives advice but doesn't follow it

What BnS said was given with evidence and they were both valid and well-supported. That's why I liked the case.

While it gave me a slightly scummy read on Oats, Yamato is still my #1 scumread. I said that and that's why I did not vote with Oats. I would love to pressure Oats when Yamato dies. However, I need to go after one target right now because if I hunt multiple people I hunt no one.

I didn't read LIX so idk how Oats played there. I don't see anyone complain to BnS about how Oats' meta was like this, so I don't even understand why it's only an issue when I agree with it.

Marv is grasping for reasons to call me scum here, so I called it shitting up the thread.

On March 11 2013 23:37 VisceraEyes wrote:
For the reason I stated in my post originally voting for him - because I hadn't filtered him.

On March 11 2013 23:46 cDgCorazon wrote:


I have to go but I can't say much so:

Hiro is the same when it comes to going after easy targets
Hiro has not given much advice so I can't say anything about #2

However, their play is slightly similar. A big lack of thread presence and a lack of scum hunting.

Hiro would be someone else I would be ok with lynching after Yamato.

(That brings the list of people to Oats, Hiro, and Acro-who hasn't contributed much besides overreacting to everything).

On March 12 2013 00:37 austinmcc wrote:

Because stutters is stutters, and I have played with him. Crossfire had posted and it was ALL fluff (and pretty much still is). slOosh is, again, someone who has impressed me as a townie, and someone i KNOW is generally lurky/less active as scum. Remember me checking him in parallel worlds? Same thing here. An uninterested slOosh is a scumslOosh imo, and as of yet we have no indication that his disinterest is personality-related and not because he's scum.

Seeing as how you initially responded to snb with summary statements like oats was town, felt like townoats, or whatever, I don't like how you are requesting others to go do the work of digging up oats's posts from past games and comparing his posts to others in this game and pastoats. You chose not to do that.

On March 12 2013 00:46 marvellosity wrote:
Here is Stutters' filter from LIX: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=393344

Here is Stutters' filter here: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=400204&user=276621

Do you think they look similar?

On January 22 2013 04:58 Stutters695 wrote:
I voted toad because his style seems much easier to read than yours, chezinus, or palmars to me. I even was doubting Palmar after the d1 lynch, and I had a scumread on you that was wrong almost the entire game. Toads style feels much more like my own and I think that will help us analyze why he would do whatever he does after becoming mayor.

On January 23 2013 08:24 Stutters695 wrote:
So you knew he was a smurf due to his silence? Obviously we know he is one now but newbies have entered reel games before and just been overwhelmed. Not a huge deal either way though.

Since you said you said you wouldn't want a smurf due to readability why wouldn't you vote for someone like Toad who is readable instead of supporting Chez? You say that it let you see if Chez was more readable but isn't that the exact same thing as voting a smurf except with a smurf not only does it offer the same chance to read them but also offers a chance of identifying who they are (which you implied you'd like to do)?

On March 12 2013 01:01 austinmcc wrote:

I don't really see how you could

On March 11 2013 07:25 wherebugsgo wrote:
the man in the sky tells us the rat is not a rat but a mouse

but the not-rat (actually a mouse) says he may be a mouse with a mask today and a rat tomorrow. "Today I die," the mouse says. And, he says, he will not tell us when he turns into a rat! Of course, any doorknob would know that a rat does not announce its own presence.

So is this mouse a mouse under the bridge, or a mouse over the bridge?

I say, brothers, that we burn the mouse and say our prayers, for it shall be safer for us if the mouse does not become rabid.

On March 12 2013 01:18 Vivax wrote:
Marv what do you make of Hiro? I don't see anything making me think he's town yet instead he seems to be sure that yamato's announcement meant Kurumi was confirmed town, wouldn't he doubt it at first since he's been pushing him as scumread just before?

Doesn't look to me like suspicious townie rather like scum that doesn't mind switching his target to a guy that's basically grushlike as town and unknown as mafia since he was scared of pushing a guy who has been announced as town.

On March 12 2013 01:24 Dandel Ion wrote:

Read the travesty that was Themed.

He didn't even post there from a certain point onwards, he just ninja-voted and was generally a very, very useless person.

And that after MTG where he played okay, even by non-lurker standards.

Policy lynching him is chill and all, but saying that he doesn't pull that shit as town is wrong.


Why don't you go after a lurker that's actually guaranteed to be scum, namely Crossfire.

On March 12 2013 01:27 Dandel Ion wrote:
Just sheep me.

On February 15 2013 05:44 Stutters695 wrote:
After checking his full filter, what really concerns me is that he does it again (misusing meta). If he said I should be policy lynched because he doesn't like how I'm playing I'd totally understand that. But implying I'm scummy despite multiple games with me with similar d1 posting by me doesn't sit wellwhen combined with what I said about Marv and him.

Other than those posts he doesn't say a whole lot. I'm leaning scum since all his other posts are calling people town and saying kurumi was scummy but never following through. I'd really like to hear his thoughts on who he'd lynch if I wasnt an option before I rush to judgement on him though since I've had people do this who were scum and town.

Going through filters who really concerns me is Mr.CC. I cohosted one of his games and obsed the others and I don't think I've ever seen him this inactive. That feels like a really large change. I need to see if he has actually played any non-newbies but unless he shows up he'd be a good policy lynch. Still going through filters though, that just stood out as really off to me.

On March 12 2013 01:30 Stutters695 wrote:
Seriously guys I'm not scum. Last time xfire did this that I remember he was total scummers (MtGII), last time I did this I was still town.

On March 12 2013 01:31 Dandel Ion wrote:

I have gotten the feeling you agreed on Crossfire.
So why don't you want to actually agree?