|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On March 14 2013 23:42 Vivax wrote: Also don't answer to marv he aims to pull people into small-sized conversations picking at their latest posts instead of having them look at filters.
LMAO. "Don't converse with people"
you're a fucking treasure, Vivax
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
By the way Vivax, it's about Corazon's entire filter, as I made abundantly clear in my post earlier.
He doesn't talk about Foolishness at all.
I would like to know why.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On March 14 2013 23:44 yamato77 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 14 2013 23:40 marvellosity wrote: Vivax is still [b][red]Vivax!. Because he's fucking insane. He seems to be insane in an even more anti-town way than normal though.
Acro wants to kill Corazon which is good. The main thing I don't like about Acro is how he called Foolishness null for ages. So I don't know.
slOosh is on the mafia side for me right now. He's purposefully twisting things. Again, like the post I made a few pages ago about how he wanted to lynch me first, I said I should be lynched first (theoretically) and he's like no! lynching yamato first is just as good! despite saying he thinks I should be lynched first. He specifically changed his stance in the space of 2 posts just to disagree with what I'd written. I think Vivax is actually mafia, but I don't have time to make the case until after the deadline, and it'll be stronger with the Foolish flip. I basically agree with your Acro logic in total, so that's good. I want to talk more about Sloosh, though. Aside from playing contradictory to you, what else in his filter factors into your read on him?
It's all kinda swaying around the middle. Tunnels yamato all day? bad. decides to come off the tunnel? good.
Does a blatantly bad plan with nukes? Bad. Seems to explain it quite well? good.
Really it's his most recent behaviour that's the most interesting. Like, why is he picking me up for saying "I'm more abrasive as town" instead of "I'm less abrasive as mafia"? They are quite evidently exactly the same thing. He's not stupid.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Yes Vivax, Acro's attitude on Foolishness is why I'm not at all sure of his alignment.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
I may end up talking about you quite a bit more when I dig into Foolish's post, but I'm still leaning town on you for the original reason that I don't know why you announce your shot or take that shot. Further your aggression on numerous targets is unlike your scum-games where you generally tunnel on one person only (say hapa in british, or ... er... whoever it was in Fruity). I also liked how you conversed with ppl Night 1.
The doubts for me is your lack of activity at certain points. You excuse this with "I'm busy" but usually as town you MAKE the time to post. In fruity you were like "woops, i was lynched because i was at work and couldn't post" but that never seems to affect you when you're town.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On March 14 2013 23:51 Oatsmaster wrote: I changed my mind, too lazy to change my vote if in fact its on Foolishness.
Foolishness is town. K got past that?
That means that Marv is scum, due to the very nice explanation and trap that foolishness did.
Now what marv did after foolishness's post is nitpick on one specific part and never mention it again. DrH said in his mafia podcast(go listen its really nice). That as scum, you dont want to address a hugeass case point by point because then more slips of logic will happen and you are now very under pressure. Instead, marv picks a small portion, blasts it, then moves on. Now people dont really remember that and the focus is off marv and onto foolishness who cant defend himself/hammer marv cause he is not here. Then the thread goes to pieces, with marv hastening its destruction.
With Foolishness town, this means that yamato is probably scum, as well as crossfire for reasons previously stated.
lol you best have a good explanation for this one Oats.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On March 14 2013 23:53 austinmcc wrote:Show nested quote +On March 14 2013 23:46 marvellosity wrote: Does a blatantly bad plan with nukes? Bad. Seems to explain it quite well? good. ELI5? I think that the explanation and plan go hand in hand. It LOOKED bad, but given the explanation, may not have been (or was well-intentioned, something like that). I don't think you can quite separate them this much, and the whole nuke plan still just looks very townie. If he's scum, he gives nukes to townie people. Townie people nuke their scumreads. Those scumreads are getting nuked, quite possible that we don't lynch them (see supersoft not wanting to lynch Foolishness, see nobody wanting to lynch Kurumi D1 in bureaucracy). Day ends, we've lynched candidate #3 or #4 because 1 and 2 were getting nuked, the nukes don't go off, day is part-wasted and part spent working things out under false assumptions. None of that happened. Instead, scummy players got nukes, to see how they used them and how people reacted. I don't call that a blatantly bad plan. I call that a very good use of the power he was given. How do you view it as blatantly bad, even outside of the explanation given?
We didn't get much information from it and wasting half a day because volatile or suspicious people are pretending to nuke various targets isn't helpful.
As to your bold, we were lynching Foolishness today, because I went past the nuke shit.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On March 14 2013 23:58 austinmcc wrote:Show nested quote +On March 14 2013 23:55 marvellosity wrote:On March 14 2013 23:53 austinmcc wrote:On March 14 2013 23:46 marvellosity wrote: Does a blatantly bad plan with nukes? Bad. Seems to explain it quite well? good. ELI5? I think that the explanation and plan go hand in hand. It LOOKED bad, but given the explanation, may not have been (or was well-intentioned, something like that). I don't think you can quite separate them this much, and the whole nuke plan still just looks very townie. If he's scum, he gives nukes to townie people. Townie people nuke their scumreads. Those scumreads are getting nuked, quite possible that we don't lynch them (see supersoft not wanting to lynch Foolishness, see nobody wanting to lynch Kurumi D1 in bureaucracy). Day ends, we've lynched candidate #3 or #4 because 1 and 2 were getting nuked, the nukes don't go off, day is part-wasted and part spent working things out under false assumptions. None of that happened. Instead, scummy players got nukes, to see how they used them and how people reacted. I don't call that a blatantly bad plan. I call that a very good use of the power he was given. How do you view it as blatantly bad, even outside of the explanation given? We didn't get much information from it and wasting half a day because volatile or suspicious people are pretending to nuke various targets isn't helpful. As to your bold, we were lynching Foolishness today, because I went past the nuke shit. I disagree on not getting much information. We got GOOD info on slOosh and on crossfire, at least from my point of view. I'll take using 1/4 of a day cycle to get info that pretty much convinces me about the alignments of 2 players, and pulls up some minor info elsewhere (we don't know yet everything that came out of that discussion, and we won't know until later). Do you think there was a better/townier thing to do with fake nukes?
I don't know. If my role ONLY had fake nukes i'm not sure I'd use them at all because they're liable to cause chaos. My question I guess is whether that was all his role could do or if he chose to do that in particular. In addition I find his posting in this foolish/marv thing to be extremely subpar *shrug*
Anyway I got half an hour lunch break now so I'm gonna try work on Foolish's post some.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On March 14 2013 08:07 Foolishness wrote: So why is yamato "the best kill"?
More importantly, yamato is not acting like his town play and is pushing mafia agendas. His day vigi shot day 1 is an incredibly anti-town thing to do. Put yourself in that situation, would you day vigi someone day 1 as a town-aligned role? Hell no. We don't have specifics about his role, but if you had the ability to mod-confirm someone in the thread would you do it day 1? Hell no what a waste cause the mafia just shoots that person. The point is that there is no reason for him to use that ability as town on day 1 (no matter what his role PM told him).
This completely refuses to look at the scum-motivations for using it day 1, just the absence of supposed town-motivation. Kurumi is potentially a perfect person to announce as town as thread in day 1 and maybe make mafia waste a kill on him. Kurumi was a total liability - as town I fucking LOVE the idea that mafia might be shooting at a martrying Kurumi instead of VE, BC, me, supersoft... well almost anyone you like really. Foolish says there is no point in using the role day 1 as town. Well, what's the point as mafia? To get rid of a martrying liability for town, Kurumi? Is Foolishness arguing here that Kurumi was a positive town-force in the thread, and that town would be much better off with him around, continuously demanding votes and martrying himself? How is this even an argument? Mafia tend to hold their day-vig shots. Example is LX, where Chezinu waited until Day 2, to vig someone who was flying under the radar, but looked town, and more importantly was heavily pressuring mafia (Vivax). Vivax, the most impulsive player on TL Mafia, had a day-vig in Fruity Mafia but only used it on Day 2 to concede the game. Actually impulsive, rash shots are almost always the preserve of townies. Mattchew shooting 5 minutes into PYP: Redux. Some game long ago where VE got shot 15 minutes into the game. I'm sure there are other instances but generally speaking bad day-vig shots done in a bad manner are the preserve of townies, and not mafia. Foolishness has been around long enough to know all this, yet he's arguing otherwise. To reiterate, Foolish says "The point is that there is no reason for him to use that ability as town on day 1" yet history shows completely the opposite, townies use their day vigis freely, and mafia are much more scared and prone not to using them recklessly. Mafia want to look as good as possible with their shots, they want to mitigate damage. Mafia has no motivation to vigi someone who is shitting up the thread on Day 1.
On March 14 2013 08:07 Foolishness wrote:
As stated by a few people (including myself) yamato is playing completely different from his town game. In his town game he is more abrasive and direct about his insults (if he thinks you're an asshat, you are guaranteed to find out about it). And more importantly, he's always helpful when he's town. He says what he thinks and pushes his reads. This can be seen in Town Ain't Big Enough mafia. However in Fruity Mini mafia (when he's mafia), he sits back and let's the town do it's thing; he doesn't contribute.
So overall yamato is not playing like he does when he's town. He's not helping us, and his day 1 vigi shot was incredibly anti-town. If he was town there was no reason for him to do what he did.
In his town-game he is more abrasive and direct about his insults and we'd know about it? Let's see shall we?
On March 11 2013 01:21 yamato77 wrote: Holy fuck you guys wasted a ton of pages saying nothing.
Is it sad that the best town player since I went to bed last night has been Oats?
Also, everyone calling out Acro for voting Ver is ridiculous. That post was bad and he should feel bad.
I feel like no one saying anything of any significance about VE and his idiocy at the start of the game is disturbing. Why did he react the way he did to me randomly calling him mafia? Why did he fall in line with Corazon to attack me for very little reason? VE acting weird to start the game. People aside from super have ignored him and I am annoyed by it.
Bugs, if you're town, I suggest you quit the useless posting. It's fine to roleplay and all, but I want SOME sort of reads/hidden analysis in there. Right now it's just nonsense.
On March 11 2013 06:59 yamato77 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 11 2013 05:59 cDgCorazon wrote: Hmmm...guess who has decided to lurk now that other targets are being hunted? Yamato and Acro...
##Vote: Yamato
Gonna start scumhunting? i'm at work you asshatit's in my filter What I will do is solve this Kurumi problem right now.
HE LITERALLY USES THE WORD ASSHAT THAT FOOLISH SAYS HE USES WHEN HE IS TOWN.
On March 12 2013 02:56 yamato77 wrote: I was at work while I was doing the stuff with my role.
It's in my filter, you lazy, scummy dumbasses.
There's more in his filter, go look for yourselves. I think I've adequately described how what FOolishness is saying is complete bollocks. He IS doing the things that FOolish is saying he does as town, yet Foolish is calling him mafia.
On March 14 2013 08:07 Foolishness wrote:
Also consider the fact that crossfire was in no danger of getting killed at the moment. If he was about to get lynched I can see sending out a nuke as a last ditch effort to survive or make something happen (hey I just kinda did it, though my motivation is way different). It was completely out of the blue, just as yamato's day vigi was completely out of the blue.
I analyzed this guy day 1 but didn't come up with anything conclusive. On one hand he hadn't done anything to exhibit being mafia, but nothing striking to say he was for sure town either. With his nuke shot we now know where his agenda is and what side of the town he's on.
The first paragraph he's using here is an argument that because Crossfire was in no danger of getting lynched, he'd purposefully put himself immensely in the spotlight as mafia by launching a nuke at Foolishness. This makes little to no sense. Further, slOosh's explanation of his role was that he made the PMs he sent sound like the receivers of the nukes HAD to use them or bad things would happen. So he was compelled to use the nuke. But Foolishness glosses over this completely.
And to the "out of the blue" comment. Apart from what I just wrote, I will reiterate that town are usually impulsive and doing things out of the blue. Mafia sit back and blend in, townies have no fear. This is really basic mentality stuff that Foolishness fails to grasp, or rather is twisting in a ridiculous fashion to fit his narrative.
Dandel Ion commented very well on the 2nd paragraph I quoted here. We should all be able to agree that Crossfire on Day 1 was playing quite far outside of his town meta. And yet he's calling it inconclusive. He then again uses the faulty nuke logic to call him mafia. No no no.
Do you remember earlier in the game when supersoft said a good case provides pros and cons? Of course Foolishness fails to mention Crossfire's behaviour at the deadline, he also fails to mention how Crossfire behaved with his explanations about the nukes. Like austin (and others?) pointed out, he came across as genuine and sincere here, but of course this is missed out entirely.
On March 14 2013 08:07 Foolishness wrote:cDgCorazon I'm also confident is town because he's playing to his semi-trolly town meta as seen here. When he's mafia he's completely serious as seen here.
Corazon. The only at all trolly thing that Corazon has done this game is to do his King Of Hearts thing, which is VERY EVIDENTLY part of his role. How is he using this as a comparison to past games? If we take out his role-related King of Hearts thing, Corazon is quite clearly playing very, in fact far too, seriously, which here Foolishness himself admits is how he plays mafia. I've talked about Corazon enough, but to remind you, his constant questions to town of "are you SURE there isn't someone scummier than me?", his blind tunnel on yamato, and his refusal to comment on Foolishness are all damning. To repeat, according to Foolishness' own analysis, Corazon IS playing a 'serious' game apart from his stupid role-related stuff. THere is literally no light-heartedness, he's cursing people, he's refusing to play, he's martrying, he's refusing to engage in conversation. This is fun, trolly, town Corazon according to Foolish? What a load of shit.
The rest of his post is regarding me, which I will make in a separate post to expose more of this guy's nonsense.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Please don't let my big post at the bottom of the last page get lost. Please read it in detail.
The rest of Foolish's post on me will have to wait until later when i'm off work.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
also hi DarthPunk, welcome. I've been distracted ^^
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On March 15 2013 00:38 yamato77 wrote: Marv, I really don't want you to spend your limited time picking apart arguments from Foolishness.
Get a grip, it's the most important thing to do in the thread. I'm exposing Foolishness, and you need to read the post to understand that.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On March 15 2013 00:41 yamato77 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 15 2013 00:39 marvellosity wrote:On March 15 2013 00:38 yamato77 wrote: Marv, I really don't want you to spend your limited time picking apart arguments from Foolishness. Get a grip, it's the most important thing to do in the thread. I'm exposing Foolishness, and you need to read the post to understand that. I read the post already. I already know he lied about meta, I'm not an idiot. It's really not worthwhile to convince people you think he's mafia. Either they believe him or not, you won't change the minds of people like oats/vivax/corazon by refuting him point-by-point.
yes, of course i will. I need to show the thread that everything Foolishness says is twisted.
The point is everyone is going "oh wow that long post looks fucking awesome!" and I'm just picking it apart, lie by lie, bullshit by bullshit. The thread needs to see that making a massive post doesn't mean town. Now leave me alone.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On March 15 2013 00:44 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On March 15 2013 00:41 yamato77 wrote:On March 15 2013 00:39 marvellosity wrote:On March 15 2013 00:38 yamato77 wrote: Marv, I really don't want you to spend your limited time picking apart arguments from Foolishness. Get a grip, it's the most important thing to do in the thread. I'm exposing Foolishness, and you need to read the post to understand that. I read the post already. I already know he lied about meta, I'm not an idiot. It's really not worthwhile to convince people you think he's mafia. Either they believe him or not, you won't change the minds of people like oats/vivax/corazon by refuting him point-by-point. Huh? One of my main points was that marv nitpicked the shit out of that post. Now he isnt, although it came after me 180ing. Keep going marv. Ok the only thing that feels off for me is that scum is going all in on this, if its who I think it is. So when foolishness flips town, they all die. Which isnt that great. So maybe they know that foolishness is town. And that he is unlynchable.
I said last night I have to go watch Walking Dead with my partner, I also said when I came into the thread today that I would only be able to work on Foolish's post properly on my lunch break. Which I then did.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On March 15 2013 00:44 yamato77 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 15 2013 00:43 marvellosity wrote:On March 15 2013 00:41 yamato77 wrote:On March 15 2013 00:39 marvellosity wrote:On March 15 2013 00:38 yamato77 wrote: Marv, I really don't want you to spend your limited time picking apart arguments from Foolishness. Get a grip, it's the most important thing to do in the thread. I'm exposing Foolishness, and you need to read the post to understand that. I read the post already. I already know he lied about meta, I'm not an idiot. It's really not worthwhile to convince people you think he's mafia. Either they believe him or not, you won't change the minds of people like oats/vivax/corazon by refuting him point-by-point. yes, of course i will. I need to show the thread that everything Foolishness says is twisted. The point is everyone is going "oh wow that long post looks fucking awesome!" and I'm just picking it apart, lie by lie, bullshit by bullshit. The thread needs to see that making a massive post doesn't mean town. Now leave me alone. He's still the leading vote-getter by far, dude. You don't need to push his lynch, it's already happening. Why not talk about something else that is more useful? You've been on this Foolish bullshit all day basically. Give it a rest.
fuck off, yamato.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On March 15 2013 00:46 yamato77 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 15 2013 00:45 marvellosity wrote:On March 15 2013 00:44 yamato77 wrote:On March 15 2013 00:43 marvellosity wrote:On March 15 2013 00:41 yamato77 wrote:On March 15 2013 00:39 marvellosity wrote:On March 15 2013 00:38 yamato77 wrote: Marv, I really don't want you to spend your limited time picking apart arguments from Foolishness. Get a grip, it's the most important thing to do in the thread. I'm exposing Foolishness, and you need to read the post to understand that. I read the post already. I already know he lied about meta, I'm not an idiot. It's really not worthwhile to convince people you think he's mafia. Either they believe him or not, you won't change the minds of people like oats/vivax/corazon by refuting him point-by-point. yes, of course i will. I need to show the thread that everything Foolishness says is twisted. The point is everyone is going "oh wow that long post looks fucking awesome!" and I'm just picking it apart, lie by lie, bullshit by bullshit. The thread needs to see that making a massive post doesn't mean town. Now leave me alone. He's still the leading vote-getter by far, dude. You don't need to push his lynch, it's already happening. Why not talk about something else that is more useful? You've been on this Foolish bullshit all day basically. Give it a rest. fuck off, yamato. It's not useful anymore to do what you're doing. You're not stupid, Marv. You can get mad at me or whatever, but I think you know he's dead in the water already.
it is useful, because there's still a bunch of Foolishness fanboys, not all of which are mafia. Don't ever tell me how to play again, please.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
it's not anti-town, it was one extremely well written and consolidated post.
In fact, you telling me off about posting it has spanned 20 posts as opposed to the one post I made.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On March 15 2013 00:52 Oatsmaster wrote: Is there a situation that both Foolishness and Marv are town and that we need to look elsewhere?
Like, YAMATO!!!!
if you actually read my post, it should be pretty clear already that Foolishness isn't town
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On March 15 2013 00:56 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On March 15 2013 00:53 marvellosity wrote:On March 15 2013 00:52 Oatsmaster wrote: Is there a situation that both Foolishness and Marv are town and that we need to look elsewhere?
Like, YAMATO!!!!
if you actually read my post, it should be pretty clear already that Foolishness isn't town You are wrong on occasion. I just dont think Fool is scum, and I dont think Marv is scum.
You know I like you a lot, so in the nicest way possible - I'm much more likely to be right than you, and you know that.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On March 15 2013 00:58 austinmcc wrote: I honestly think that there's less of a chance they're both town than there is of them both being mafia. As in, there's an outside chance both are mafia, and an outside outside outside outside chance they're both town.
Each is spending a majority of his focus on the other. Makes it look less suspicious that neither is taking control over town in a bunch of aspects and directing things, because they're really just focused on this one guy, and when that one guy flips scum, ta da! All the effort worth it. More focus on a singular targets just helps duck a policy lynch later on, imo.
You do realise that I wanted to lynch Corazon earlier in the day before Hiro prodded me back towards Foolish, right? 
|
|
|
|