|
I was hitting up people on irc, no positive response. Everyone pm your friends, we need one more in!
|
On February 26 2013 08:02 Toadesstern wrote:Show nested quote +On February 26 2013 07:34 Promethelax wrote:
I was hitting up people on irc, no positive response. Everyone pm your friends, we need one more in! syllo and Sandro don't want to, the rest like Marv, bugs and co are probably already in the game :p Makes it kind of hard to know who to ask.
I know. That is the trouble. I know who one smurf is but that still leaves seven (or six of I assume bc is using the vm account)
|
Attention thread!
1. I am running for mayor, if elected I will random lynch. This is because of the large number of smurfs and newbies. Vote for me, vote for RNG. I have a 1 in five shot at lynching scum and it will be hilariously awesome, additionally giving me the extra votes will force scum to shoot into someone with extra votes or someone considered better than me (I.e. toad who won't run due to no BGs)
2. Milk suckler is mocsta. Don't vote him for mayor.
3. I'm awesome. You should vote me for mayor.
|
On February 26 2013 09:09 MilkSuckler wrote:Show nested quote +On February 26 2013 09:07 Promethelax wrote:
1. Vote for me, vote for RNG. I have a 1 in five shot at lynching scum and it will be hilariously awesome,
You gonna include yourself in that RNG dear
If I am allowed to lynch myself day one. Yes. I believe in true RNG.
|
On February 26 2013 09:13 ObviousOne wrote:Show nested quote +On February 26 2013 09:12 Promethelax wrote:On February 26 2013 09:09 MilkSuckler wrote:On February 26 2013 09:07 Promethelax wrote:
1. Vote for me, vote for RNG. I have a 1 in five shot at lynching scum and it will be hilariously awesome,
You gonna include yourself in that RNG dear If I am allowed to lynch myself day one. Yes. I believe in true RNG. Tell us more how you plan to transparently execute your randomly generated mislynch!
I have a plan. It will be random and it may be a mislynch but it may not be. Vote for me, vote for a real RNG. Too often do scum have the ability to push the day one lynch into a townie, not with me as mayor. With me as mayor scum cannot control the lynch.
|
On February 26 2013 09:16 Toadesstern wrote:
How likely is it that we can make it happen that we can get our lynch candidate come in as second in the votes?
We could get 2 flies with one stone that way.
Thoughts?
Do you mean so that we can get rid of the pardoner role and make sure it doesn't stay in the game?
|
On February 26 2013 09:19 JungleJorge wrote:Show nested quote +On February 26 2013 09:12 Promethelax wrote:On February 26 2013 09:09 MilkSuckler wrote:On February 26 2013 09:07 Promethelax wrote:
1. Vote for me, vote for RNG. I have a 1 in five shot at lynching scum and it will be hilariously awesome,
You gonna include yourself in that RNG dear If I am allowed to lynch myself day one. Yes. I believe in true RNG. Isn't that retarded as both alignments?
Yes? But the idea of a random lynch is good. You should be able to see why. Assuming you don't suck, which I'm assuming.
|
On February 26 2013 09:28 ObviousOne wrote:Show nested quote +On February 26 2013 09:23 Wade Fell wrote:On February 26 2013 09:22 JungleJorge wrote:On February 26 2013 09:16 Toadesstern wrote:
How likely is it that we can make it happen that we can get our lynch candidate come in as second in the votes?
We could get 2 flies with one stone that way.
Thoughts? That's a good idea if we could make it happen, but unless the person we are set on lynching is town, I find that unlikely to occur. No harm in giving it a shot though. I don't like the idea of sending a bunch of votes the way of our top scumread and strongly oppose this idea. In the spirit of entertaining the thought, do you think it would be possible if there is one clear leading candidate? Such as someone ahead by more votes than the mafia team could possibly swing away to a secondary candidate? Or does the math not work in our favor for this? For example: 13 votes for Candidate A (intended mayor) 5 votes for Candidate B (intended lynch) At this point we could consolidate votes on Candidate A and then move several to B to ensure they are elected pardoner. This could take place after, say, 30-36 hours of the day is complete or something thereabouts.
You are assuming that scum has zero thread influence, why?
|
On February 26 2013 09:43 Wade Fell wrote:Show nested quote +On February 26 2013 09:41 Vivax wrote:On February 26 2013 09:40 ObviousOne wrote:On February 26 2013 09:39 Vivax wrote:On February 26 2013 09:34 ObviousOne wrote:
Top scum read probably geript at the very moment. His candidacy for mayor seems like a disaster waiting to happen. Guaranteed mislynch from him as either alignment. And what exactly makes him scum? I'm living in the moment here. I don't make anything of the WF JJ shenanigans yet. Got asked a question, gave an answer. Ask me about geript again in 23 hours, okay? Promise? WF JJ? Wade Fell and JJ I've gotta launder my komodo dragon, I'll be back in a bit.
Wat?
|
Okay, so RNG didn't create the discussion I wanted. Screw you guys.
On February 26 2013 09:28 Wade Fell wrote:
My new platform is killing Layabout
Read his posts
hes scum
Explain.
For the moment my top scum read is WoS, he responded to gerpit's candidacy all wrong, obviously assuming gerpit is town but statistically...
On February 26 2013 09:23 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On February 26 2013 09:20 geript wrote:
It looks to me that the best person for mayor is someone who is willing to:
A. put in the time to read the thread
B. both make and evaluate other's cases
C. is unlikely to be an early target for NK
In this regard I would nominate myself as I am more likely to devote more time to reading (both filters and filter in the context of the thread as a whole) than anyone else. Additionally, I am relatively unknown which removes untoward bias for or against me due to previous games as well as making me a more impartial arbiter as it regards established players.
My lynch platform is:
Scum read > hard/impossible to read > null read > town read
## vote geript Except for the fact that you were killed N1 last game for the above reasons, by someone who is very likely smurfing in this game.
He focuses on the likelihood of a night kill on gerpit, he is too interested in night actions and not in the candidacy or the actual ideas which gerpit proposes. I'm not a fan of this post or WoS's mentality.
Vote me, screw random lynch. I'll lynch WoS.
|
On February 26 2013 09:59 VisceraEyes wrote:
Prom that's closer to what I'm looking for. Why do you prefer to lynch WoS over Vivax?
Because I don't care to lynch Vivax. I know I'm the only guy on the forum who thinks this but Vivax is a good player and useful to town when town. Also, as Marv showed in fruity, he is catchable as scum on meta alone.
Tl:dr I have a scum read on WoS and not on Vivax.
|
On February 26 2013 10:03 Aquanim wrote:
Since WoS has disappeared into the shadows I'll ask someone else.
@Milksuckler, any posts that you think are particularly sketchy so far?
How about you aqua. Do you have ay thoughts? All I've heard from you is blends questions to weak/new players.
|
On February 26 2013 10:11 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On February 26 2013 10:07 Promethelax wrote:On February 26 2013 09:59 VisceraEyes wrote:
Prom that's closer to what I'm looking for. Why do you prefer to lynch WoS over Vivax? Because I don't care to lynch Vivax. I know I'm the only guy on the forum who thinks this but Vivax is a good player and useful to town when town. Also, as Marv showed in fruity, he is catchable as scum on meta alone. Tl:dr I have a scum read on WoS and not on Vivax. Show nested quote +On February 26 2013 09:57 Promethelax wrote:Okay, so RNG didn't create the discussion I wanted. Screw you guys. On February 26 2013 09:28 Wade Fell wrote:
My new platform is killing Layabout
Read his posts
hes scum Explain. For the moment my top scum read is WoS, he responded to gerpit's candidacy all wrong, obviously assuming gerpit is town but statistically... On February 26 2013 09:23 WaveofShadow wrote:On February 26 2013 09:20 geript wrote:
It looks to me that the best person for mayor is someone who is willing to:
A. put in the time to read the thread
B. both make and evaluate other's cases
C. is unlikely to be an early target for NK
In this regard I would nominate myself as I am more likely to devote more time to reading (both filters and filter in the context of the thread as a whole) than anyone else. Additionally, I am relatively unknown which removes untoward bias for or against me due to previous games as well as making me a more impartial arbiter as it regards established players.
My lynch platform is:
Scum read > hard/impossible to read > null read > town read
## vote geript Except for the fact that you were killed N1 last game for the above reasons, by someone who is very likely smurfing in this game. He focuses on the likelihood of a night kill on gerpit, he is too interested in night actions and not in the candidacy or the actual ideas which gerpit proposes. I'm not a fan of this post or WoS's mentality. Vote me, screw random lynch. I'll lynch WoS. Show nested quote +On February 26 2013 09:23 Vivax wrote:
Geript, what makes you unlikely for NK if you fulfil A + B properly?
lol Explain plz. Vivax is equally guilty of what you're accusing WoS of.
Because they are different people. I've never had the ability to read him based on behaviour, only meta.
|
On February 26 2013 10:11 JungleJorge wrote:Show nested quote +On February 26 2013 09:39 WaveofShadow wrote:On February 26 2013 09:37 MilkSuckler wrote:On February 26 2013 09:35 geript wrote:
As of yet, no. The question is why do you feel my newbie status is important? Actually its the opposite. You become non-existent. 'pretty much how I feel right now. See you D2 everybody! Promethelax, how do you feel about this post?
I'm not a fan.
|
On February 26 2013 10:15 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On February 26 2013 10:13 Promethelax wrote:On February 26 2013 10:11 VisceraEyes wrote:On February 26 2013 10:07 Promethelax wrote:On February 26 2013 09:59 VisceraEyes wrote:
Prom that's closer to what I'm looking for. Why do you prefer to lynch WoS over Vivax? Because I don't care to lynch Vivax. I know I'm the only guy on the forum who thinks this but Vivax is a good player and useful to town when town. Also, as Marv showed in fruity, he is catchable as scum on meta alone. Tl:dr I have a scum read on WoS and not on Vivax. On February 26 2013 09:57 Promethelax wrote:Okay, so RNG didn't create the discussion I wanted. Screw you guys. On February 26 2013 09:28 Wade Fell wrote:
My new platform is killing Layabout
Read his posts
hes scum Explain. For the moment my top scum read is WoS, he responded to gerpit's candidacy all wrong, obviously assuming gerpit is town but statistically... On February 26 2013 09:23 WaveofShadow wrote:On February 26 2013 09:20 geript wrote:
It looks to me that the best person for mayor is someone who is willing to:
A. put in the time to read the thread
B. both make and evaluate other's cases
C. is unlikely to be an early target for NK
In this regard I would nominate myself as I am more likely to devote more time to reading (both filters and filter in the context of the thread as a whole) than anyone else. Additionally, I am relatively unknown which removes untoward bias for or against me due to previous games as well as making me a more impartial arbiter as it regards established players.
My lynch platform is:
Scum read > hard/impossible to read > null read > town read
## vote geript Except for the fact that you were killed N1 last game for the above reasons, by someone who is very likely smurfing in this game. He focuses on the likelihood of a night kill on gerpit, he is too interested in night actions and not in the candidacy or the actual ideas which gerpit proposes. I'm not a fan of this post or WoS's mentality. Vote me, screw random lynch. I'll lynch WoS. On February 26 2013 09:23 Vivax wrote:
Geript, what makes you unlikely for NK if you fulfil A + B properly?
lol Explain plz. Vivax is equally guilty of what you're accusing WoS of. Because they are different people. I've never had the ability to read him based on behaviour, only meta. And you're able to read WoS based on behavior I guess? What kind of games have you played with our undulating friend?
I can't read him on meta because I haven't played with him. Which is why I read him on behaviour instead. You were a scum coach in his one townie game. Do you have any insight you wanna share?
|
On February 26 2013 10:17 Toadesstern wrote:prom could you respond to what I (and VE in response) said over here: Show nested quote +On February 26 2013 10:06 VisceraEyes wrote:On February 26 2013 10:04 Toadesstern wrote:On February 26 2013 09:57 Promethelax wrote:Okay, so RNG didn't create the discussion I wanted. Screw you guys. On February 26 2013 09:28 Wade Fell wrote:
My new platform is killing Layabout
Read his posts
hes scum Explain. For the moment my top scum read is WoS, he responded to gerpit's candidacy all wrong, obviously assuming gerpit is town but statistically... On February 26 2013 09:23 WaveofShadow wrote:On February 26 2013 09:20 geript wrote:
It looks to me that the best person for mayor is someone who is willing to:
A. put in the time to read the thread
B. both make and evaluate other's cases
C. is unlikely to be an early target for NK
In this regard I would nominate myself as I am more likely to devote more time to reading (both filters and filter in the context of the thread as a whole) than anyone else. Additionally, I am relatively unknown which removes untoward bias for or against me due to previous games as well as making me a more impartial arbiter as it regards established players.
My lynch platform is:
Scum read > hard/impossible to read > null read > town read
## vote geript Except for the fact that you were killed N1 last game for the above reasons, by someone who is very likely smurfing in this game. He focuses on the likelihood of a night kill on gerpit, he is too interested in night actions and not in the candidacy or the actual ideas which gerpit proposes. I'm not a fan of this post or WoS's mentality. Vote me, screw random lynch. I'll lynch WoS. are you mad that it didn't work or that you didn't get more credit for it? Because it sure sounds like that. We had some discussion about the rnd you suggested, we had some discussion about what I suggested. I most definitely wouldn't phrase it the way your are This is something I noticed too. It sparked discussion - I'm left wondering what kind of discussion he thought RNG was supposed to generate if it didn't generate the kind he wanted. because again, the way you phrased that sounds awfully odd and I'm thinking of multiple explanations. None of them includes something you with a townie-mindset.
Because I wanted it to gain some real traction. I had an idea about actually getting close and withdrawing my nomination since if scum was up for lynch they'd be pushing me as mayor where if there was a townie up for lynch they'd be pushing against me. It's a plan that only works if I get support on it. That was the discussion I wanted to spark.
|
On February 26 2013 10:22 Aquanim wrote:Show nested quote +On February 26 2013 10:20 ObviousOne wrote:On February 26 2013 10:18 Aquanim wrote:On February 26 2013 10:11 Promethelax wrote:On February 26 2013 10:03 Aquanim wrote:
Since WoS has disappeared into the shadows I'll ask someone else.
@Milksuckler, any posts that you think are particularly sketchy so far? How about you aqua. Do you have ay thoughts? All I've heard from you is blends questions to weak/new players. Not liking ObviousOne so far. On February 26 2013 09:34 ObviousOne wrote:
Top scum read probably geript at the very moment. His candidacy for mayor seems like a disaster waiting to happen. Guaranteed mislynch from him as either alignment. Terrible, terrible reasoning for this read.
I'm living in the moment here. I don't make anything of the WF JJ shenanigans yet. Got asked a question, gave an answer. Ask me about geript again in 23 hours, okay? Promise?
And he can't justify it at all.
I don't do reads on the fly. You want an actual read from me, you'll need more than 45 minutes of a handful of players talking. Who's to say any mafia are even participating yet?
He gives a read and then says this? Garbage in, garbage out. Nice one. Care to actually answer any of the points?
Seriously so you have any thinks?
|
On February 26 2013 10:28 MilkSuckler wrote:Show nested quote +On February 26 2013 10:25 Aquanim wrote:On February 26 2013 10:23 ObviousOne wrote:
<insert>. You still haven't given any reason why geript is scum, merely that if he is then this would be a viable tactic. Do you have any actual reason to think that he is scum? This directed to me or OO
given that he is quoting OO I doubt it. Why is he scum to you though? You could always share without being asked. Or are you scum?
|
On February 26 2013 10:29 Toadesstern wrote:Show nested quote +On February 26 2013 10:25 Toadesstern wrote:On February 26 2013 10:21 Promethelax wrote:On February 26 2013 10:17 Toadesstern wrote:prom could you respond to what I (and VE in response) said over here: On February 26 2013 10:06 VisceraEyes wrote:On February 26 2013 10:04 Toadesstern wrote:On February 26 2013 09:57 Promethelax wrote:Okay, so RNG didn't create the discussion I wanted. Screw you guys. On February 26 2013 09:28 Wade Fell wrote:
My new platform is killing Layabout
Read his posts
hes scum Explain. For the moment my top scum read is WoS, he responded to gerpit's candidacy all wrong, obviously assuming gerpit is town but statistically... On February 26 2013 09:23 WaveofShadow wrote:On February 26 2013 09:20 geript wrote:
It looks to me that the best person for mayor is someone who is willing to:
A. put in the time to read the thread
B. both make and evaluate other's cases
C. is unlikely to be an early target for NK
In this regard I would nominate myself as I am more likely to devote more time to reading (both filters and filter in the context of the thread as a whole) than anyone else. Additionally, I am relatively unknown which removes untoward bias for or against me due to previous games as well as making me a more impartial arbiter as it regards established players.
My lynch platform is:
Scum read > hard/impossible to read > null read > town read
## vote geript Except for the fact that you were killed N1 last game for the above reasons, by someone who is very likely smurfing in this game. He focuses on the likelihood of a night kill on gerpit, he is too interested in night actions and not in the candidacy or the actual ideas which gerpit proposes. I'm not a fan of this post or WoS's mentality. Vote me, screw random lynch. I'll lynch WoS. are you mad that it didn't work or that you didn't get more credit for it? Because it sure sounds like that. We had some discussion about the rnd you suggested, we had some discussion about what I suggested. I most definitely wouldn't phrase it the way your are This is something I noticed too. It sparked discussion - I'm left wondering what kind of discussion he thought RNG was supposed to generate if it didn't generate the kind he wanted. because again, the way you phrased that sounds awfully odd and I'm thinking of multiple explanations. None of them includes something you with a townie-mindset. Because I wanted it to gain some real traction. I had an idea about actually getting close and withdrawing my nomination since if scum was up for lynch they'd be pushing me as mayor where if there was a townie up for lynch they'd be pushing against me. It's a plan that only works if I get support on it. That was the discussion I wanted to spark. why did you tell us about being just being a plattform to create talk with if you wanted it to get some real traction? That kind of counters your idea. I'd say you wanted to look like someone who wants to create discussion but wants to make sure he looks good. When it became too hot (and it didn't, the timing to go back on that was way to early if you wanted to achieve something, so you're overly defensive for whatever reason) for your idea you went ahead yelling GUYS GUYS, I BE TROLL LOL DON'T TAKE ME SERIOUSDo we have a dayvig? On a different note: In case we don't have a dayvig I'll support anyone who runs of the platform of lynching Promethelax. I'd bet VE's left ball that prom is mafia right now. Anyways it's late, my english reads like a mentally handicapped writing because I'm really tired and make mistakes all the time (2:30 am over here) so I'll go to bed now.
I'll bet you both of VE's balls I'm not. When you wake back up I want your next highest read and your reasons. It's hard for me to read you when I'm too busy wondering if you are dumb or I'm playing badly. Help me get a good read on you, give me another read.
|
On February 26 2013 10:31 Wade Fell wrote:Show nested quote +On February 26 2013 10:31 VisceraEyes wrote:On February 26 2013 10:30 Wade Fell wrote:
Milksuckler is Marvellosity This is false. He uses the word "dear" to refer to people, the only person who ever does this is Marvellosity, right?
MS is mocsta. I talked to him pregame and can explain how I figured out it was him if you need it,
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
