EPTTL Mafia LX - Page 2
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
On February 26 2013 10:25 MilkSuckler wrote: Here you now say "newbie" I did not take anything out of context. Try harder next time Dear Sorry but that is a direct question regarding Vivax stance on me. Perhaps you should be reading more than just my filter. | ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
On February 26 2013 11:27 WaveofShadow wrote: A thought popped into my head regarding this...it may be absolutely retarded but you guys will let me know that after the fact, won't you? Moc that whole post looks fishy to me, this line seems especially out of place from Wave. Do you really like it that much? | ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
First off, there are three distinct tones in WoS key post and I'm going to separate them out. A thought popped into my head regarding this...it may be absolutely retarded but you guys will let me know that after the fact, won't you? All this says is that whatever you are about to propose is absolutely retarded. All it says is, "ignore this post." This tone is returned to at the end. Since I am new to this whole durned mafia thing, I am likely to be either ignored or an easy mafia target, keeping the role out of scum's reach. The second tone is the analysis tone: Since the pardoner is inherently more dangerous as a scumrole and the plan to 'kill two birds with one stone' in all likelihood won't (or can't at this point) gain the traction necessary to be carried out, why not give up the role to someone who is likely to be targeted early anyway, or someone who if you are overly suspicious of, you can lynch yourselves anyway? Case and point: a newbie. Basically this says, "trust a newbie to be pardoner." The problem is that his argument falls apart when you really analyze it. You don't want pardoner in the hands of a newbie because it's a free pass for when they get caught for them unless they're lynched D1. I agree with previous analysis, best to put pardoner on the mayor's lynch target. Next the general plea: I graciously offer up myself to be the (possible) sacrificial lamb to do with as you will. If you so choose to lynch me for fear that I am scum, then I go down happily, hopefully bringing as much information to the table as possible before I crash and burn in an epic fireball. If you choose to keep me around, then I will serve the town gladly and I will offer up my pardon to save a deserving person. Since I am new to this whole durned mafia thing, I am likely to be either ignored or an easy mafia target, keeping the role out of scum's reach. This section is especially out of tone for him. I feel like I'm watching C3PO talk to Jabba here. This paragraph especially feels forced; the diction is all wrong for him. His posts are little more than mimicry than anything else in general but this paragraph is nothing of the sort. Next, I actually have to agree with what Prome said. The difference between Vivax response and WoS response is that Vivax actually attacks the argument (If you do A+B then no way you get to C). WoS response was essentially, "You got NK last game." WoS is playing excited this game. Even when he's grabbed a touch of heat, he's not been the slightest concerned about it and continues to "counterpressure" with bleh. I'm going to reread the thread a few times before I head to bed and sleep on it but for right now Vivax and WoS are on the top of my list but I'd need a flip to make a strong case. | ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
On February 26 2013 19:51 Aquanim wrote: You claim that WoS is speaking in "different tones". What is your actual point? And do you claim that being excited makes WoS scum? In fact what are you saying here at all besides spraying inconclusive, uncommittal suspicion at WoS? My point is that I think his posts are a combination of scripting and mimicry. No. Being excited makes him excited, but emotional state gives a read on the reasons behind the actions and thus the goal of the actions. I'm saying I think WoS is scum and I want everyone else to keep an eye on him. | ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
Ok, so in poker how I made my money was reading emotional states. You find out how a person is feeling and that gives you their state of mind. Once you get their state of mind you can see the choices their making and learn why they're making the choices they're making. My point with being excited is that it also is uncharacteristic; he doesn't run on adrenaline, that's not his shtick. He's a fly by the seat of his pants guy. Prolonged excitation doesn't make sense from a town role. | ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
Because town doesn't naturally evoke a stressor response. | ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
On February 27 2013 07:05 WaveofShadow wrote: Oh and as for Soniv, he's super busy all the time, so lack of contribution on his part is probably expected except for specific times during the day. That said if he doesn't post during those specific times I will be on his ass....still waiting on a reply from him. AND FUCKING GERIPT. Just woke up and reading. You should read my filter for your answers as I've already said. | ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
On February 27 2013 07:15 WaveofShadow wrote: Geript, I don't know what horseshit you're spouting but nowhere in your filter do you address my buddying concerns. One of the quotes you quote I even stated I was on my phone. The next one, I commented on how I got caught up at work. 1+1=2. Posting from work = less time. Posting from work = posting on phone = autocorrect. You're reading into things too much. Quite frankly the fact that you try and bring up the buddying aspect is ridiculous. You don't even make a solid case for why I would want to try and buddy up him instead of say, anyone else. You're grabbing straws at best. | ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
On February 27 2013 08:07 MilkSuckler wrote: Geript Do you still feel that way now WoS has increased his post count? + the question in the quotes pls I still feel the post was artificial. But otherwise I'm less strong on him after reviewing the rest of his filter, more null minus instead of scum. That said, I think that WF's post here is very interesting. On February 27 2013 06:02 Wade Fell wrote: If that's still your opinion at the deadline, you can count on my vote. Given that we're both going to lynch the same guy and one of us wants to be mayor and the other doesn't, I'm going to see if I can't win this election in your stead, though. It does in many regards feel like Dr. is soft running in the possible attempt to backdoor the pardoner role instead. | ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
| ||
