|
On February 26 2013 09:26 Wade Fell wrote:
Um, yeah dude you gotta call that shit out or people will see it as townie. They see a big post and are like "hey this looks townie" and if you don't call it out immediately it's bad. In fact, you're glad it was called out. You think it was a good thing, and you think me drawing attention to it was excellent. What's the deal, layabout?
Sounds like someone is overcompensating.
Its OK Wade, we just gotta piss with the dick we born with 
|
On February 26 2013 09:28 ObviousOne wrote:Show nested quote +On February 26 2013 09:23 Wade Fell wrote:On February 26 2013 09:22 JungleJorge wrote:On February 26 2013 09:16 Toadesstern wrote:
How likely is it that we can make it happen that we can get our lynch candidate come in as second in the votes?
We could get 2 flies with one stone that way.
Thoughts? That's a good idea if we could make it happen, but unless the person we are set on lynching is town, I find that unlikely to occur. No harm in giving it a shot though. I don't like the idea of sending a bunch of votes the way of our top scumread and strongly oppose this idea. In the spirit of entertaining the thought, do you think it would be possible if there is one clear leading candidate? Such as someone ahead by more votes than the mafia team could possibly swing away to a secondary candidate? Or does the math not work in our favor for this? For example: 13 votes for Candidate A (intended mayor) 5 votes for Candidate B (intended lynch) At this point we could consolidate votes on Candidate A and then move several to B to ensure they are elected pardoner. This could take place after, say, 30-36 hours of the day is complete or something thereabouts.
(1) Pardoner sux
(2) Read Mafia LIX, 1 vote could have changed everything
(3) Top scum read and why pl0x
|
On February 26 2013 09:29 Wade Fell wrote:
Milksuckler who are you lynching right now
is it layabout
why/why not
Not lynching him.
Its early game, we have only minute details to contemplate.
With that in consideration I thought he did a decent job of a cock-block.
I still don't like you; but the cock-block is a null tell. So Im lynching you so far, simply because I don't like you.
Reads subject to change obviously Dear.
|
On February 26 2013 09:33 Wade Fell wrote:Show nested quote +On February 26 2013 09:32 MilkSuckler wrote:
Not lynching him.
Its early game, we have only minute details to contemplate.
With that in consideration I thought he did a decent job of a cock-block.
I still don't like you; but the cock-block is a null tell. So Im lynching you so far, simply because I don't like you.
Reads subject to change obviously Dear. Yeah there's 0% chance anyone should consider voting you for longer than like 3.5-4 seconds.
OooOoO you have me quaking in my boots Mrs. Fell.
You're just jealous I had an awesome campaign post as inspiration. Keep trying for those cock-blocks why don't ya.
|
On February 26 2013 09:35 geript wrote:
As of yet, no. The question is why do you feel my newbie status is important?
Actually its the opposite.
You become non-existent.
|
On February 26 2013 09:48 Vivax wrote:I saw the picture of you eating a hat and am now chasing my erotic fantasies. + Show Spoiler +
Im still waiting for something meaningful from you.
Who do you prefer:
Prome and his RNG
or
Geript and his newbie mayor campaign
|
On February 26 2013 09:39 VisceraEyes wrote:
##Unvote
##Vote: Wade Fell
WTF is this shit?
|
On February 26 2013 09:56 VisceraEyes wrote:
A vote for mayor? You know, exactly what it looks like?
Baby, as the french chefs keep saying
"Where is the SAUCE"
|
On February 26 2013 10:03 VisceraEyes wrote:
He's making the most sense and I'm not instantly sickened by his lynch preference right now. Good enough for me.
I can live with that.
Move on solider.
P.S. Can I be your shadow pl0x
|
On February 26 2013 10:03 Aquanim wrote:
Since WoS has disappeared into the shadows I'll ask someone else.
@Milksuckler, any posts that you think are particularly sketchy so far?
Geript entrance has been quite weak.
Everything in his first post has been easy-to-say stances indicative of no alignment.
The follow-up (newbie) reasoning is quite meek and weak to b00t - making me want to ignore his posts (and pot shots)
This early into Day1 is a crafty way to blend in. Me no like-y.
|
I also want to see less restraint from Restraining Order.
So far all he has done is come in and shit over anyone and everyone.
|
On February 26 2013 10:10 Aquanim wrote:Show nested quote +On February 26 2013 10:07 MilkSuckler wrote:On February 26 2013 10:03 Aquanim wrote:
Since WoS has disappeared into the shadows I'll ask someone else.
@Milksuckler, any posts that you think are particularly sketchy so far? Geript entrance has been quite weak. Everything in his first post has been easy-to-say stances indicative of no alignment. The follow-up (newbie) reasoning is quite meek and weak to b00t - making me want to ignore his posts (and pot shots) This early into Day1 is a crafty way to blend in. Me no like-y. You think that running for mayor is a way to blend in? And what exactly about his reasoning is weak? Walk me through it.
Sure: Firstly, I didnt read it as a genuine attempt to run for mayor. When you add the lack of campaign follow-up since, it becomes obvious the attempt was half-hearted and actually acts to discredit him - thus allowing him to blend in by being ignored.
Secondly, his reasons for being mayor are weak at best. Even though the mayor has been nerfed this game, the role still requires more criteria than: put time into the thread; or avoid being a N1 kill.
Thirdly, he starts playing the newbie card: again providing an avenue to be ignored by the masses.
=============
I wouldn't go so far so say the above demarcates him as scum. Just the behaviour is sketchy and I am watching him closely. Will reevaluate as I have more.
|
On February 26 2013 10:21 geript wrote:
When did I play the newbie card? New here is not equivalent to newbie. Also, I like to keep my filter clean.
On February 26 2013 09:20 geript wrote:
Additionally, I am relatively unknown
Yes unknown and newbie are not equivalent. But its pretty obvious whether you are known or not. Also you have enough posts to not be a smurf... thus:
Claiming the "unknown" card is akin to claiming newbie.
On February 26 2013 09:35 geript wrote:
As of yet, no. The question is why do you feel my newbie status is important?
Here you now say "newbie"
I did not take anything out of context.
Try harder next time Dear
|
Macho Man and Expendables = ka-BOOM!!
|
On February 26 2013 10:25 Aquanim wrote:You still haven't given any reason why geript is scum, merely that if he is then this would be a viable tactic. Do you have any actual reason to think that he is scum?
This directed to me or OO
|
On February 26 2013 10:28 geript wrote:Show nested quote +On February 26 2013 10:25 MilkSuckler wrote:On February 26 2013 09:35 geript wrote:
As of yet, no. The question is why do you feel my newbie status is important? Here you now say "newbie" I did not take anything out of context. Try harder next time Dear Sorry but that is a direct question regarding Vivax stance on me. Perhaps you should be reading more than just my filter.
Right so out of everything discussed, this is the only response you elicit? Lets try harder sweetie
Show me dat town <3: Who is your sketchiest player so far?
|
Buried
On February 26 2013 10:11 MilkSuckler wrote:
I also want to see less restraint from Restraining Order.
So far all he has done is come in and shit over anyone and everyone.
|
On February 26 2013 10:35 Aquanim wrote:Show nested quote +On February 26 2013 10:31 Wade Fell wrote:On February 26 2013 10:31 VisceraEyes wrote:On February 26 2013 10:30 Wade Fell wrote:
Milksuckler is Marvellosity This is false. He uses the word "dear" to refer to people, the only person who ever does this is Marvellosity, right? People who are trying to fake being Marvellosity do it too.
I've faked multiple ppl on this smurf, not just Marv
|
Buried
On February 26 2013 10:11 MilkSuckler wrote:
I also want to see less restraint from Restraining Order.
So far all he has done is come in and shit over anyone and everyone.
[/QUOTE]
and then you come up with:
On February 26 2013 10:37 Restraining Order wrote:
Well Toad and VE are not on a scumteam together, or they'd be bussing each other right about now.
just like Snarfs/VE couldnt bus each other at start of nomination. Yes, the former is more likely than the latter; but it is certainly not concrete.
Wake up and produce something meaningful.
|
Prome has order of precedent aqua
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
