|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On February 15 2013 06:32 Keirathi wrote:Show nested quote +On February 15 2013 06:25 austinmcc wrote:On February 15 2013 06:22 Keirathi wrote:
@austin:
How does that compare to what a town iamp, specifically, would do? Off the top of my head, I can only give the you the best answer I've got - I don't know, actually. The only specific thing I remember about scum iamp is that he's more than willing to vote early. I have not refreshed my mind by reading any past games, although I remember him as scum in GSL Open III. Well I'll share, because I think he has a very interesting playstyle. Town iamp is quite capable of doing all those things you outlined. He says whatever pops in his head, randomly calls people our, and hardly ever is a major voice in getting someone lynched. He's a follower not a leader, but he does have unique viewpoints and opinions. The major way to tell the difference between scum iamp and town iamp, though, is in his attitude. Town iamp just doesn't give a fuck. He will literally say anything that pops into his head, doesn't care how it makes him look. He doesn't apologize for it, or take things back, or hold his tongue. Scum iamp on the other hand is CAREFUL. Maybe that's not the best word for it, but I think it describes it perfectly. He tries not to make sure he pisses anyone off, he isn't as free and easy with his thoughts, and he's even less aggressive than normal. Personally, I think ATM that he is kind of fitting into his scum persona atm. He just doesn't have that "I don't give a fuck" attitude in most of his posts. Im not sure I want to lynch him yet though, because there are hints of it, and I just want to see more before I come to a definite conclusion.
My inclinations are opposite. Interesting.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On February 15 2013 06:35 randombum wrote:
Marv, are you REQUIRED to post the way you are.
If I were to answer your question, potential friend, I would have to lop your penis off. And I am not inclined to show such cruelty to one so bummy.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
austin, I would share my bourbon with the scamp, iamp.
To the gentleman Crossfire - the gentleman known as Hassybaby has not given me pause to reconsider my belief that he has evil intentions.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On February 15 2013 06:44 Stutters695 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 15 2013 06:15 marvellosity wrote:On February 15 2013 06:13 Stutters695 wrote:
God damnit, all Marv makes me think.of with all this gentlemen talk is THE GENTLEMEN from How I Met Your Mother. It is my cunning plan, sir, to distract all you fine gentlemen from relevant discourse with thoughts of poorly made 'television' shows. To you sir, I pose this question: is Gonzaw not the most unseemly gentleman in this fine establishment? Does sir Hassybaby's poor analysis truly make him more likely to poison our scotch over Mr Gonzaw whose actions this fine day strongly resemble his criminal actions in LIX? (Posting like this is kinda fun lol)
A man after my own heart! A finer man I have not laid my eyes on.
It indeed remains possible that gonzaw is, as you postulate, unseemly. However, he has shown a certain level of interest and discourse beyond which the bounder named Hassybaby has displayed. Certainly it will become clearer to the gentlemen of this establishment whether gonzaw has good or evil intentions in sessions to come.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On February 15 2013 06:50 Crossfire99 wrote:
Stutters are you keeping your vote on Mr. CC? I agree that his disappearance is disturbing, but I don't know if we can convince enough people to get him lynched cause it's majority lynch.
Guys we really need to start narrowing this down because it is majority lynch. I don't wanna no lynch day 1 cause that's terrible and gives us nothing.
This gentleman speaks great wisdom. Please, fellow men of this establishment, heed his fine words.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
randombum, you appear to be a man of integrity. At the very least, I am a fan for the time being of a gentleman who concurs with my thoughts.
austin: please phrase your enquiries in a manner that I can comprehend, it would verily be appreciated by this gentle soul.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On February 15 2013 07:02 austinmcc wrote:Show nested quote +On February 15 2013 07:00 marvellosity wrote:
randombum, you appear to be a man of integrity. At the very least, I am a fan for the time being of a gentleman who concurs with my thoughts.
austin: please phrase your enquiries in a manner that I can comprehend, it would verily be appreciated by this gentle soul. I must protest at your assumption that everyone is a "gentleman." Surely some of the folks here aren't. You disagree with keirathi in terms of iamperfection's meta, it seems. But do you agree with some of the points that I raised? Do you find iamperfection to be a scummy scamp or a townie scamp?
Gentlemen may have good or evil intentions, so long as they do not curse on alternate Wednesdays.
The discourse I dislike from the scamp iamp is his desire to punish Stut-utt-ers, seemingly independent of evidence whether he was good or evil. However, the tone and manner of his discourse leads me to believe his intentions are good. As mentioned, I would share my bourbon with him.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On February 15 2013 07:03 Kurumi wrote:
I'm keeping my vote on Sylencia - he is thinking I will risk my life to confirm him as "town", never answered why he felt overwhelemed, actively lurked and still refuses to play. Also, he is the creator of my role and tried to convince me into a situation where I could die >_>
Handsome knight, would you be amenable to explaining to your fellow gentlemen precisely what you have alluded to here?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On February 15 2013 07:09 Blazinghand wrote:
i guess i'm not saying hassy or stutts lynch is bad per se but at least be aware that it would be a policy lynch >:|
I disagree, sir, and if you believe so, you have not been listening to the discourse very well.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On February 15 2013 07:11 austinmcc wrote:Show nested quote +On February 15 2013 07:10 iamperfection wrote:On February 15 2013 07:08 marvellosity wrote:On February 15 2013 07:03 Kurumi wrote:
I'm keeping my vote on Sylencia - he is thinking I will risk my life to confirm him as "town", never answered why he felt overwhelemed, actively lurked and still refuses to play. Also, he is the creator of my role and tried to convince me into a situation where I could die >_> Handsome knight, would you be amenable to explaining to your fellow gentlemen precisely what you have alluded to here? and why do you want to know that? Because kurumi makes it sound like sylencia's alignment can be determined based on what he's trying to get Kurumi to do with his role...
This is certainly a possibility. And Sylencia is a gentleman of interest - the gentleman kitaman raised good points about the man. At the minimum, I do not understand why some further discourse from Kurumi on the matter would hinder our comprehension.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On February 15 2013 07:15 Blazinghand wrote:Show nested quote +On February 15 2013 07:12 marvellosity wrote:On February 15 2013 07:09 Blazinghand wrote:
i guess i'm not saying hassy or stutts lynch is bad per se but at least be aware that it would be a policy lynch >:| I disagree, sir, and if you believe so, you have not been listening to the discourse very well. I've read the arguments in favor of lynching hassy and I am simply not convinced. yes, he was active in Parallel mafia and weighed on on matters of policy, interacting with brodoosks like foolishness and so on, and this time he's been an inactive ass (filter) but that doesn't make him scum. It makes him an inactive ass. Vig him or pressure him after this lynch, but this is at BEST a meta lynch based entirely on activity level and not mindset, and at worst a policy lynch of a potentially useful player. You're just wrong.
This gentleman would contend that he is less likely to be incorrect than you, fine sir. I have, indeed, talked about the discourse from Hassybaby in this particular establishment. It is not merely a matter of recorded discourse in previous establishments.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On February 15 2013 07:20 iamperfection wrote:
that is why i thought it was weird marv
I'm not quite sure I understand, scamp?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On February 15 2013 07:23 iamperfection wrote:Show nested quote +On February 15 2013 07:22 marvellosity wrote:On February 15 2013 07:20 iamperfection wrote:
that is why i thought it was weird marv I'm not quite sure I understand, scamp? you haven't figured out that i made your role?
Apparently I had not, young scamp. And now I understand what you are alluding to.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On February 15 2013 07:28 iamperfection wrote:Show nested quote +On February 13 2013 14:35 iamperfection wrote:
and past my bed time
imperative goal that we figure out marvs alignment im leaning scum fro his first 3 crap posts
everyone take a look at him
good night well maybe i expect to much of you but i would have thought you would have figured it out here
There are certain facets of play that I do not have great perception of. For example, in previous establishments when I had evil intentions, I was a poor show at what they term "blue-sniping." Perhaps it might amuse you, scamp, that even now you have pointed out this discourse of yours, it is still not immediately obvious to me.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On February 15 2013 08:02 Blazinghand wrote:Show nested quote +On February 15 2013 08:02 Blazinghand wrote:On February 15 2013 08:01 iamperfection wrote:On February 15 2013 08:00 Blazinghand wrote:On February 15 2013 07:59 iamperfection wrote:On February 15 2013 07:56 Blazinghand wrote:
iamp I want you to seriously sit down with the three oats filters I linked, or at least the quotes I linked, and tell me this is town oats
you won't be able to do that because this isn't town oats you cant just categorically say that. Each of those games is a different beast. CT has so much activity there was a ton of info to go off of ( this game not so much) The other game was a newbie of course he is going to be more forceful he doesn't have vets or better players to listen to in this game he has stuck his neck out and isnt trying to blend in he is town in this game. wow you literally didn't read my case, did you. you're actually just scum. ##unvote
##vote iamperfection whatever dude your delusional tell me why you think im scum you didn't read my case and you're acting like you read it also you want a bad policy lynch
This particular gentleman wonders if you are in fact yamato in disguise. I wonder, in particular, how lynching someone who lurks in the shadows has become in this establishment, and recent establishments, a "policy lynch" or "coinflip". This indicates that gentlemen have a lack of confidence in their ability to read those with few posts.
On February 15 2013 08:09 Keirathi wrote:Show nested quote +On February 15 2013 08:03 iamperfection wrote:On February 15 2013 08:02 Keirathi wrote:On February 15 2013 08:00 iamperfection wrote:On February 15 2013 07:59 Keirathi wrote:On February 15 2013 07:56 iamperfection wrote:On February 15 2013 07:55 Blazinghand wrote:
i categorically oppose a lurker policy lynch when there are scummy people to be lynched but fucking lurking is scummy So, since scum are the only people that ever lurk, then the scumteam must be Hassy/Sylencia/MrCC/Stutters! Thank you for solving the game! [/sarcasm] stfu No. Your entire premise is dumb, because it can be categorically proven than townies lurk from time to time, for whatever reason. Yes, lurking is bad. Yes, lurking hurts town. Yes, it is frustrating to play with people who never post. But no, lurking does not make someone scum. And there are valid reasons to actually think other people ARE scum. show me where the fuck i said every fucking lurker is scum Lurking is literally the only reason you've given for wanting to lynch Hassy. So why Hassy, and not CC? Or Sylencia? Or Stutters? If lurking is scummy for one, then it should be scummy for all. Why are you picking him out of the crowd? Context says that if lurking is enough to condemn Hassy as scum, it should be enough to condemn them all.
I am aware, gentleman Keirathi, that this is not aimed at me. Hassybaby usually has enthusiasm for themed games at least when he has good intentions. I remember a previous establishment (Mad Men) where I confidently declared him of evil intentions, for the reason that he never showed any interest in his fellow gentlemen. Count Cheesecake, to my horror, is performing a similar feat to his shenanigans in the watering hole named 'LVIII', therefore I am not confident that he may have evil intentions; Stut-utt-utters has come across as amiable to discourse of late. The man known as Sylencia I also believe may well have evil intentions. He continuously makes little chitter-chatter with other gentlemen, but only ever about his own person, and never unprompted. This is why looking at such gentlemen is not merely "policy".
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On February 15 2013 08:16 Blazinghand wrote:
the issue here iamperfection is that many players in this game have found legit cases to make. I don't think the case on hassybaby is a legit meta case (like say my case on oats) because you're not addressing his mindset of his pattern of play as scum. you're just saying "look, he's posting less, he must be scum" and this is not a legitimate way to play. This is a policy lynch in a room filled with scummy players. We should be hunting scum, not policy lynching. Your refusal to actually read my case only further reinforces my suspicions that you are working against the town
I have quite clearly pointed out, my esteemed sir, that the little contribution that Hassybaby did make looks like a sham, a farce, a pretence. His apparent enquiry into Mr D Ion's alignment was empty and not followed through. As I have indeed mentioned before, it is the appearance of caring but in a manner that does not demonstrate as such.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
I am an extremely sad gentleman. I created BlazingHand's role, and a fucking sweet one it was at that.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On February 15 2013 09:18 iamperfection wrote:Show nested quote +On February 15 2013 09:17 marvellosity wrote:
I am an extremely sad gentleman. I created BlazingHand's role, and a fucking sweet one it was at that. guess you will have to go elsewhere why you no care that much about lynch?
+ Show Spoiler +somewhat offtopic, so.
Firstly it should be clear to you how I was planning to approach this game from the chatter at the beginning. Actually I tried way harder than I had planned to try already. In fact my preferred candidate was in the lead for quite some time. I'm not the mayor you're looking for, mostly I wanted to find a really good case to sheep (as in MTG Mafia just finished, where I jumped on gonzaw's case). Unfortunately there wasn't one and Hassy looked like a great lynch.
Secondly, and this should be clear to anyone who has read my most recent games, I do in fact have a partner. And it is Valentine's Day. Go figure. I just came home, anyway, from his house.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On February 15 2013 09:21 jcarlsoniv wrote:
Note: I'm out for a friend's birthday for the night.
I'll read all your bitching and whining about the role I created later.
Did you in fact make young Oats' role? Or am I forgetting a detail from elsewhere.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On February 15 2013 09:35 austinmcc wrote:
I guess you can interpret that as "Maybe I thought it was possible BH was scum," but I feel like he'd just come out and say so if that were the case, instead of talking about himself in the third person?
That was indeed my interpretation, my good sir. For what other reason did he say "you can bitch about the role I created tomorrow." Also
On February 14 2013 05:30 jcarlsoniv wrote:
Also, I would like to point out that since Blazinhand challenged me and I voted him, and Dandelion picked up the assault on Oats, BH has all but fallen off the face of the planet.
I do not understand why gentleman jcarlson would ask the rest of us gentleman to bitch about the role he created if he did not, in fact, create young Oats' role.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
