|
On January 27 2013 22:34 Vivax wrote: Chez post all your PMs please.
I still want more opinions about yamato before I reveal the check. I know Adam's, FTs, but not Toad's. Toad wanted to discuss him at the start of the day but is not disinterested in doing so. Vivax, sounds like you checked Yamato.
Considering your check would show role + alignment; I assume you got green check. The question is, did you receive a role other than vanilla; is that where the hesitation to reveal originates from?
|
Vivax.
Palmar is dead on. Im going to bed in 1 hr, and probably wont be awake at the deadline (its a public holiday tomorrow).
As for yamato, all you do is talk about him, why else would I think it was someone else. As for green check, thats the only reason i can think of you requiring discussions prior to release.
|
Are we back to this again Vivax.. seriously...
You sprout so much stuff i have no reason to believe you received a red check as you have shared nothing since your declaration.
Explain why this is scummy in nature to think?
|
Vivax your an idiot.
I just did a filter search on you since Day 3 started (i.e. pgs 15-19) (ctrl+f: red)
There is no mention you got a red check, so stop bullshitting like you told us what your check is.
Second of all, all you have done is ask EVERYONE what they think of yamato77.
Dont try and bullshit your way out of this one, the filter doesn't lie.
|
ahh ok, didnt notice that post
apologies.
So can I assume your voting BKE + your red check?
|
I couldnt think of a reason you not give a red check.
As I said before, the only thing I could thing of, you get a green check and due to confirmation bias you were dead set on your check being the godfather. Hence instead trying to promote discussion around the check. To me that makes sense as a valid play.
|
Well Bugs thinks Axle is town to 99% degree.
I dont think Yamato is town to that degree, but based on a filter read on him, I thought his posts have driven town in a good direction. so yes, i think he is town (i just wouldnt say 99%.. i dont have that type of confidence in my reads in general)..
you on the other hand have been campaigning for him to be lynched all game, it wouldnt surprise me if you got a green check and said.. ohh.. he must be the godfather.
the actions you have taken all game support that you would make this move.
|
No idea.
your check on gonzaw was a good play. he was kinda out of the spotlight at the end of Night 1, so you had great foresight to make that check.
as for the second check, i doubt there was a framer involved. only because who you checked to me seems unpredictable. The chance of a framer connecting is (literally) 1/16.
If i haphazard a guess, I would think you cop checked Clarity/Adam. But thats the move I would do as a cop (and I havnt been a cop before)
|
(2) If you get a red check on yam, I would question the check.... i said prior your check appears unpredictable BUT.. if you indeed did cop check yamato, to me that is a predictable check (due to the constant interest you showed to him in each game cycle) so I think he would be a definite frame candidate.
(1) Axle has nothing to do with it.. im saying.. some players have the confidence to say.. player x is 99% town... im saying i do not have that confidence. .. I think yamato is town, but i wouldnt bet my life on it (i.e. 99% confidence)
|
I said, if it was me I would check clarity. your really reading into nothing. Half your game has been hammering yamato, the other half is demanding FT give up his two masons.
Anyways, I didnt notice you would check yamato, to be frank, most of your posts I ignore/skim.
I apologise for posting opinions without reading your posts in full detail, but you write so convoluted you make me think of AxleGreaser...the difference is with you I think it is intentional.
|
Your a nob head.. its all clear in the posts I just said. I am not going to repeat myself. Stop looking for associations that do not exist. Your overdoing this whole "over the top pressure" play that its not even strong in effect anymore.
BTW... nob head isnt being ad-hominem, im not attacking your argument with that statement. im quoting fact.
|
Noted FT, Auto-Ignore is on.
|
Right.. so im scum.. build the case you wimp
|
Its obvious now the check on Gonzaw was a fluke.
I suspect Vivax put 22 names in a hat (including his own) and plucked out Gonzaw to determine Night1 check.
|
On January 28 2013 00:35 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On January 27 2013 23:42 Mocsta wrote: No idea.
your check on gonzaw was a good play. he was kinda out of the spotlight at the end of Night 1, so you had great foresight to make that check.
Speaking of anti-town
I'll bite.
Indulge me on why.
|
On January 28 2013 00:35 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On January 27 2013 23:42 Mocsta wrote: No idea.
your check on gonzaw was a good play. he was kinda out of the spotlight at the end of Night 1, so you had great foresight to make that check.
Speaking of anti-town
P.S.
I rescind the use of "good play" in association with your name, due to the below.
On January 28 2013 00:32 Mocsta wrote: Its obvious now the check on Gonzaw was a fluke.
I suspect Vivax put 22 names in a hat (including his own) and plucked out Gonzaw to determine Night1 check.
|
Im not voting for Chezinu, I gave my reasons why, and have not felt convinced otherwise.
Im comfortable with mkfuba07, Oats summarised him quite well. The guy is a master blender.
Im not sold on clarity being town, the excuse that scum wouldnt lose a guy whilst valid, is not a 100% heuristic. He needs to be scrutinised, but I think with 12hrs to go and him being at midnight (or close to it) we have to leave him for Day 4.
So im BKE + mkfuba07
|
On January 27 2013 05:08 Mocsta wrote: Day3 ##Vote: BKE ##Vote: mkfuba07
|
Not that I want a love fest, but I have felt that way this game. Has been really solid leadership.
Vivax was in my opinion one of the most challenging aspects to being town leader, but I think the situation has been handled as best it could.
I definitely feel more comfortable/confident this game, than any of my previous ones. I agree, a lot is to do with the leadership.
|
ooo.. do we need to vote double lynch again for day 4?
|
|
|
|