EPTwhen 3 people (you, palmar, and clarity) called me an idiot :D
Hero Mini Mafia - Page 4
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
when 3 people (you, palmar, and clarity) called me an idiot :D | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
| ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
On December 11 2012 18:56 thrawn2112 wrote: atm i'd rather lynch a lurker than adam Adam is a lurker. Or at least semi lurker. Look at his filter | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
On December 11 2012 21:24 Vivax wrote: I've read Adams filter. So basically, the case on him seems to be built on "the change of tone in his post". That post with changed tone dabears mentioned was written one day after the last ones, so it's likely that he's writing like that cause he's not heated up like the day before. That day, he finished into an OMGUS fight with dabears, where they basically both vote for each other cause they argue about having to vote for the people you lean scum on. And this is where the matter stinks. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=384953¤tpage=9#171 This is dabeers post about Adam. OH SHIT HE'S SUSPICIOUS CAUSE HE'S NOT VOTING FOR THRAWN. Look at the post, look at the voting thread, look at the reactions. Adam voted before debears upon being accused by him of not voting thrawn, meanwhile, dabears accused Adam of something he himself did. Only clarity so far has expressed criticism of this case against Adam, now I will, too. 1.The case is shit 2.The case is shit 3.The case is shit Being this a shit case accepted by many people, I think there's scum trying to sheep in it. Yeah, you aren't reading the fucking thread. It wasn't about his vote | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
| ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
On December 11 2012 23:30 Vivax wrote: Now I remember why I said that. Debears asked me why I defend you while you're voting for me. hahahaha. The transmission of mistakes. Well, you made a case against me, but didn't vote for me. Sup Adam? Yeah I was like wtf I thought he did. That is odd | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
On December 12 2012 00:28 Adam4167 wrote: Right now, I think Tunkeg has a solid chance of flipping scum. His reaction to WBG's case was overly defensive and he's contributed very little. Ill take a closer look in the morning. Its 2am, I am going to bed. Wtf???? You jump from thrawn, to me, to vivax (you made a long post on vivax), and now Tunkeg (and you have said nothing about him) This guys is scum yo | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
like really, I'm getting shivers from their interactions | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
On December 11 2012 22:37 Vivax wrote: I'm reading better than you think . I still think your case is full of shit. I see a lot of word-twisting in it. And I don't care if Adam is voting for me as long as I believe him to be town. What kind of bad question is that. Why are you thinking from a scum point of view? The first bolded part is what dabears himself does. The second is word twisting of Adam saying: "If I wanted to call you scummy I would have" into "I don't think he's scummy." And I don't see any scum motivation in hard questioning thrawn. He acted not according to his meta, and that's what made Adam so suspicious of him. How is that scummy??? Go read, Bluelightz mate. I hope you saw the part where Debears said Adam is suspicious for not voting now. So my guess is that you believe I'm scum? | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
On December 12 2012 00:01 marvellosity wrote: Tunkeg's play has been more useless than complacent. What I was actually getting at with my question is that in general terms I view Adam's ability to contribute productively as significantly higher than Tunkeg's. Would you agree with this? And if so, do you see where I'm going?  At this point marv, I can see both being scum. tunkeg has done nothing, got emotional, never saying that WBG was wrong On December 11 2012 16:06 Tunkeg wrote: Lol WBG. In these games you are linking to, and others games like it, haven't you been the one complaining about me posting readposts like that? And also me posting "useless" questions? And now you say the same play you labeled as bad and useless actually was scumhunting? If you want me lynched for meta fine. But don't try to convince the thread you were a fan of my previos play. If someone wants to lynch you for meta, and you are town, HOW IN THE FUCK ARE YOU OK WITH THAT????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Adam When has this dude seriously pushed his targets? Thrawn - didn't think he was scummy. Just questioning him for shits and giggles Me - Voted me for a 4 sentence "case" that was a response to a question. Backed down off me pretty quickly Vivax - made a long post about vivax when he unvoted me. No vote on vivax. No follow up on vivax Tunkeg - picks someone who could be an easy target for scum (if tun is town) out of nowhere. never mentioned tun the whole game until the bandwagon already started | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
On December 12 2012 00:43 Palmar wrote: To be fair I don't think he ever called thrawn scum. Exactly | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
On December 12 2012 00:44 Vivax wrote: You're starting the same shit you did with Adam, debby. I think your case against Adam was bad, that doesn't necessarily imply you're scum. Also, I would really enjoy if people put huge quotations into spoilers, it helps in keeping the thread readable. I'm sorry you don't make your reads clear. My bad | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
On December 12 2012 01:33 marvellosity wrote: The thing I like least about jay at the moment is where his vote is parked. Z-Bo, what's your opinion then between Tunkeg and Djodref? Which is more likely to be scum now if you think it's unlikely it's a bus? I don't see you write anything at all on Adam, what's your read on him? Well, here's our main prob right now marv munk-e - promised activity, hasn't backed it up BL - hasn't been active at all really. I realize he just made a post VE - lol.... Tunkeg - been inactive for a while now grush - inactive All dese guys are problematic regardless of alignment right now Then scumreads: jay Adam tunkeg we gots alotta problems right now | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
Please post, make reads, start a riot, etc so that we can at least get a read off of you. You're making this hard as shit for us fellow town members | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
3 others think I am right Why are u defending adam? | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
On December 12 2012 02:09 marvellosity wrote: The likeliest would be BL could be a scum vote. But maybe not too. Who knows! Hahaha marv <3 | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
Maybe tun is actually town after all hmmm | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
On December 12 2012 02:40 VisceraEyes wrote: I went through and filtered jay, reached a conclusion and voted. I haven't looked into Tunkeg OR Adam so Bugs and Palmar, settle the fuck down. I'm looking into them now. I agree that Adam looks bad before going to filter him, but that doesn't change the fact that right now I'm more certain of a jayb lynch. So here's what I'm gonna do. I'm gonna go through and read the cases on Adam and Tunkeg, then I'm gonna go filter the guys. With all of that fresh in mind, along with my recent filtering/case of jayb, I'll decide who among them I feel the best about lynching, because I think those three are our best bets for a lynch based on the wagons right now. Anyone concerned about my activity, tough titties. I'm here now, if you wanna say something, say it to my FACE! "It" Booooommmmmmm | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
Clarity, 1) you want to lynch him because he posted reads. Posting reads, even rapid fire ones, is non alignment indicative 2) BL's posting, or lack thereof, has led him into the spotlight, and put him under massive pressure (unnecessary for scum to do so when they can just post once in a while to look like they are contributing) 3) Sheeping. You think your case is good, and you find him scummy cuz he sheeps you? that doesn't make sense Also, why would a town BL consolidate and sheep onto someone probably getting lynched? BECAUSE WE NEED 9 VOTES TO LYNCH SOMEONE AND HE WON'T BE HERE. The worst possible outcome we could have today is a no lynch | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
| ||
| ||
