|
On December 12 2012 00:37 debears wrote:Show nested quote +On December 12 2012 00:28 Adam4167 wrote:On December 12 2012 00:05 Vivax wrote: While Tunkeg's halfassedness is detrimental to town, I start doubting if scum would do it in such an obvious way. In lack of better options, I still consider him to be a valid lynch candidate along with jay (Who I've read from bugs post has a tendency to get mislynched).
While I think debears case against Adam is bad, I don't like his entrance right now. It doesn't look like he's been properly scumhunting lately, just some more half assed questions and statements. Thanks for saying you lean town on me though.
ADAM, who are you gonna vote for if you had to? Right now, I think Tunkeg has a solid chance of flipping scum. His reaction to WBG's case was overly defensive and he's contributed very little. Ill take a closer look in the morning. Its 2am, I am going to bed. Wtf???? You jump from thrawn, to me, to vivax (you made a long post on vivax), and now Tunkeg (and you have said nothing about him) This guys is scum yo
To be fair I don't think he ever called thrawn scum.
|
He said something like "he's in the I don't know wtf he's doing category" if I recall correctly, cba looking his exact words up.
|
Tunkeg's town, he's probably not ballsy enough as scum to confirm me town like that, so it's most likely a read.
|
Don't question it, just let it happen
|
On December 12 2012 07:47 Vivax wrote: Debby, yours is probably the most persistent tunneling I have witnessed in my short unsuccessful mafia career, I hope you hit the right spot.
you and me both bro
|
|
btw I'd like marv to take more active role in this game.
|
On December 12 2012 09:03 debears wrote: Only if he's town palmar, only if he's town
That's the assumption.
Also can we like get a vote or two extra on Adam just to prevent any last minute shenanigans?
|
changing the lynch now is silly, if we're wrong we'll just have to suck it up.
The case on Adam is a legit one. Feel free to yell at me if things don't go as planned.
|
Marv is right btw.
Also, this last-minute claim is so bad.
|
|
@Bugs: now that your teammate is dead, do you feel sad?
|
On December 12 2012 17:57 wherebugsgo wrote: my play is clean, so I'm scum...the fuck?
I could play like a retard, but no one likes when I do that.
I'm a big fan.
Also you're scum.
|
Hey look guys, here's some perfect logic:
Bugs didn't vote Adam, so he must be scum.
I'm completely serious, I will tunnel the fuck out of him tomorrow.
|
On December 12 2012 18:27 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On December 12 2012 18:27 Palmar wrote: Hey look guys, here's some perfect logic:
Bugs didn't vote Adam, so he must be scum.
I'm completely serious, I will tunnel the fuck out of him tomorrow. go for it, noob. If you're town, you really are just nothing more than a noob for thinking I'm scum.
Oh shit you hurt my feelings.
But are you not the noob for not supporting my case on Adam? Oh wait, you're not, because you're scum.
I mean after all we can conclusively prove that I was right.
|
On December 12 2012 16:07 Djodref wrote:Show nested quote +On December 12 2012 16:02 thrawn2112 wrote: eh, my memories of people hard defending each other D1 are usually of scum hard defending a townie. I think that scum hard defending scum wouldn't be too likely He did it when it was not sure yet that Adam would be lynched. And he discedited people voting Adam. ”there is scum pn this wagon”
Hello Djodref:
You are not required to post anything more at all in this thread. Everything you've said has been dumb, useless and I think you're either scum or bad.
In both cases, please just shut up and only vote according to what I tell you.
|
On December 12 2012 18:57 wherebugsgo wrote: shoot me so I don't have to keep fucking around defending myself against people who are right
Now this I can get behind.
|
Hey bluelightz, you down for killing bugs tomorrow?
|
uh...
I asked are YOU down for killing bugs. I don't care what the popular opinion is.
|
On December 12 2012 21:34 Djodref wrote:Show nested quote +On December 12 2012 18:01 thrawn2112 wrote:On December 12 2012 17:51 Hapahauli wrote: Also he pretty clearly doesn't assume your town, since he pressure-votes you later down the line. No, he thought I was town the whole time. His first read on me was: "My first reaction to thrawn post was "yeah, obvious scum" then I thought that he might not have been serious at all. A one liner for a miller claim doesn't look real, regardless of his alignment. The way he answered "nvm, then" shows that he is carefree about it." The other issue is him asking why I did it and pressure voting me to find out. He later says the town motivation he thought I had was that that I was hoping to attract pressure from scum. This was based on a post I made from looney. So if he thinks I'm trying to attract scum attention, why would he vote pressure me so that I'll announce it to the thread? @ thrawnI didn't know what the fuck you were trying to do at first when you said "not explaining why I did this at all". At first, I was expecting you to simply admit that you wanted to spark discussing with this obvious fakeclaim but I didn't understand why you went into that "not explaining anything at all mode". I pressure voted you because I was still not so sure I had made the right choice at that time (i.e. town move or lying scum) and I wanted you to explain yourself for the following reasons: - If town, you would have better off stopping this ASAP imo, because people would have voted you for lying and being anti-town for not explaining yourself. Also, if you were baiting mafia, it was going to be far to obvious, so it didn't matter so much for you to "come clean".
- If scum, it would have been better to force you into posting more shit

Then, I thought about the comment you made in the Looney Game...
Told you to stop posting.
|
|
|
|