EPTParanoia Mafia - Page 12
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
| ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
You said present ur read on keir Like do you mean scumread? | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
| ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
| ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
vig, detective, watcher, 4 masons 7/13 players??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? the fuck? | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
| ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
Do you notice the disconnect from the opening lines of bh's thing right to the marv claim? There's a bunch of shit missing in there. Idk though that's a lot to fake..... off the top of my head I'd say lynch sandroba and see where that gets us with your claim austin | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
I would like some insight Why would austin claim and say he knows sandro is scum and he is watcher if scum? He's watcher and sandro scum - he wants to make sure we lynch mafia He's scum and sandro scum - bus sandro for town cred he's scum and sandro town - get a mislynch and a 1 for 1 trade point 3 is just dumb | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
| ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
On December 06 2012 08:33 Xatalos wrote: Might I add: 2 confirmed townies + 1 non-confirmed town for 1 scum. That's a REALLY bad trade...!!! Wait 2 confirmed townies? huh??? we trade sandro for austin if austin is scum if austin is watcher we get scum for free | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
1. Austin lying and we lynch him: We get a scum Sandro most likely confirmed town 2. Austin telling the truth and we lynch him: We lost our watcher Sandro scum confirmed 3. Austin lying and we lynch Sandro: Austin confirmed scum We lose an inactive townie 4. Austin telling the truth and we lynch Sandro: We get a scum Austin most likely watcher Results in which we kill scum first attempt: 1,4 Results in which we get confirmed scum as other after killing a townie: 2,3 So I think the question is which out of 2 or 3 is more favorable for town? The answer is 3 Austin has been active, he has made reads. If he is the watcher it gives the mafia someone to kill as priority Sandro has not been active. He has not made much in terms of read. Scum wouldn't be inclined to nk him quickly Based on the above, from a purely neutral view, lynching sandro is the better choice based purely on how much we lose if austin is telling the truth and we lynch him first. I will ponder the claim and how austin acted n2. But I would like to share this. As of now I would rather lynch Sandro first | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
On December 07 2012 01:01 sandroba wrote: @austin yes. That's because you are most likely traitor. Then you don't need to be stupid. I love it when people condemn others based off pure speculation of what exists in a closed setup Great analysis | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
On December 07 2012 01:23 sandroba wrote: He is either that or scum, which one makes more sense? It is not speculation it's behavior analysis ty. he is either town or scum. We don't know if there are traitors. There have only been normal roles so far. How are you so sure there is a traitor? Are you the traitor? You are coming up with reasons for voting him. I don't like that one bit | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
Making up reasons for voting him | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
On December 07 2012 01:39 sandroba wrote: You must not have taken your pills today. I know for a fact that he is either scum or traitor. Traitor is a normal role, just like millers, masons, watchers. He is either complete bonkers scum or traitor, I'll go with traitor because I have a brain. Watch the flip and then apologize thx. How about you show me how his posting this whole game is solely/largely scum motivated? If you can do that successfully, then I'll vote him | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
A cop, a vig, two masons, two more masons, and a watcher have claimed That's 7 power roles in a 15 player game. And from a guess there isn't a scum roleblocker based on the fact that dyhs vig shotwent through The cop vig and one mason are confirmed. I'm treating keir as confirmed. That's 4 blues. We have 3 possible fakeclaims in the group above. Idk if we would even have 6 power roles with no scum rb qt this point | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
If they're claim was false, then there'd be a vig, cop, 2 masons, and a watcher. That's 5 blues. I would think you would be super suspicious that there would be 2 more masons. In other words, with the knowledge that sandro is scum if you are watcher, the game would be pretty much over. I don't see there being 7 blues. So it's either you or BH and MrZ imo. Combine that with that fact that you watched BH last night for some reason when DYH/Keir would be the obvious nks. Especially with the fact that you should be suspicious of BH and Mrz. WHY WOULD YOU WATCH BH AND NOT KEIR OR DYH WHEN A BH/MRZ CLAIM TRUE WITH YOURS WOULD MAKE 7/15 PLAYERS BLUE AND 4/15 THAT COULD CONFIRM THEMSELVES?????? ##Vote Ausin | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
| ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
What if paranoia of this game is too many blues? Holy shit. Jingles whole plan has been made. He's want town to lose from mislynching so many blues!!!!!!! | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
| ||
| ||
