|
huh I thought I included it... oh well
|
|
|
On December 05 2012 21:34 Acrofales wrote:Show nested quote +On December 05 2012 21:07 CaveJohnson wrote:On December 05 2012 21:00 Acrofales wrote:
@Drazerk: you are not playing your normal style. For one, you are not yelling that you should be killed before lylo, and are actually scared about staying alive, using your protective abilities on yourself rather than someone useful to town. Why is that? I jailed Kita didn't I? gimme some credit. Also I've already said - I need to be alive when Lavos spawns Grey knows me too well. Took all of 25 minutes?
Who said lynching me would kill me
|
On December 05 2012 21:46 Acrofales wrote:Show nested quote +On December 05 2012 21:35 CaveJohnson wrote:On December 05 2012 21:34 Acrofales wrote:On December 05 2012 21:07 CaveJohnson wrote:On December 05 2012 21:00 Acrofales wrote:
@Drazerk: you are not playing your normal style. For one, you are not yelling that you should be killed before lylo, and are actually scared about staying alive, using your protective abilities on yourself rather than someone useful to town. Why is that? I jailed Kita didn't I? gimme some credit. Also I've already said - I need to be alive when Lavos spawns Grey knows me too well. On December 05 2012 21:32 CaveJohnson wrote:
Sure lets lynch me Took all of 25 minutes? Who said lynching me would kill me It killed Toad just fine when he claimed he was unlynchable. I'm not afraid of you being a jester this game.
Lets play the fool game once more then
|
I claimed an ability like it. Didn't use it though.
|
So do I have to campaign for prehistory again?
|
All my abilities are one shot or I would just keep spamming levitation every cycle Syllo
|
On December 06 2012 06:42 Hopeless1der wrote:Show nested quote +On December 06 2012 06:37 Acrofales wrote:
I just read Zbo's filter and it is completely inconclusive. He has accused pretty much everybody of being scum for rather terrible reasons. Now he may really be trying to figure people out, pressuring them with long cases and reacting to their response, or he could be scum making bad cases on people in order to look townie.
There are some posts that just don't sit right with me, but it could be the problem of English as a second language.
His vote for Sandro D1 is not really indicative of alignment. His reasoning for the vote might be, but depends on meta. He never hopped off, but scum could easily have hopped off: Sandro wasn't getting elected.
His vote for Toad on D2 is also not indicative of alignment. He spends most of the day tunneling TC and never leaves off his scum read, however it was clear that TC was not going to be lynched. Choices were basically Sandro and Toad and a non-Sandro vote is consistent with his D1 behaviour.
After the lynch he makes a couple of posts accusing various people of being scum, but his activity drops off and he never follows up with actions. I will have to look at VE and SnB's filters to see if there's any associative tells, but Zbo's filter doesn't give me much to work with.
At the moment I am liking the test. Austin healing H1 seems like a pretty good idea. H1 is an unlikely target for other protection and I think he's probably town. Lets see if he can get that heal.
Back to deciding between CJ and risk which one is worse. CJ will always be bad. Risk could be useful, he just isn't right now.
I find that rather offensive considering I'm one of the only reasons why we even got a lynch this cycle.
|
On December 06 2012 06:54 goodkarma wrote:Show nested quote +On December 06 2012 06:48 CaveJohnson wrote:On December 06 2012 06:42 Hopeless1der wrote:On December 06 2012 06:37 Acrofales wrote:
I just read Zbo's filter and it is completely inconclusive. He has accused pretty much everybody of being scum for rather terrible reasons. Now he may really be trying to figure people out, pressuring them with long cases and reacting to their response, or he could be scum making bad cases on people in order to look townie.
There are some posts that just don't sit right with me, but it could be the problem of English as a second language.
His vote for Sandro D1 is not really indicative of alignment. His reasoning for the vote might be, but depends on meta. He never hopped off, but scum could easily have hopped off: Sandro wasn't getting elected.
His vote for Toad on D2 is also not indicative of alignment. He spends most of the day tunneling TC and never leaves off his scum read, however it was clear that TC was not going to be lynched. Choices were basically Sandro and Toad and a non-Sandro vote is consistent with his D1 behaviour.
After the lynch he makes a couple of posts accusing various people of being scum, but his activity drops off and he never follows up with actions. I will have to look at VE and SnB's filters to see if there's any associative tells, but Zbo's filter doesn't give me much to work with.
At the moment I am liking the test. Austin healing H1 seems like a pretty good idea. H1 is an unlikely target for other protection and I think he's probably town. Lets see if he can get that heal.
Back to deciding between CJ and risk which one is worse. CJ will always be bad. Risk could be useful, he just isn't right now. I find that rather offensive considering I'm one of the only reasons why we even got a lynch this cycle. Pure speculation... Do you even have scum suspects. Or are you too busy being a useless troll?
I have scum suspects but we saw what happened when I tried to do anything this game.
|
On December 06 2012 06:57 Hopeless1der wrote:Show nested quote +On December 06 2012 06:48 CaveJohnson wrote:On December 06 2012 06:42 Hopeless1der wrote:On December 06 2012 06:37 Acrofales wrote:
I just read Zbo's filter and it is completely inconclusive. He has accused pretty much everybody of being scum for rather terrible reasons. Now he may really be trying to figure people out, pressuring them with long cases and reacting to their response, or he could be scum making bad cases on people in order to look townie.
There are some posts that just don't sit right with me, but it could be the problem of English as a second language.
His vote for Sandro D1 is not really indicative of alignment. His reasoning for the vote might be, but depends on meta. He never hopped off, but scum could easily have hopped off: Sandro wasn't getting elected.
His vote for Toad on D2 is also not indicative of alignment. He spends most of the day tunneling TC and never leaves off his scum read, however it was clear that TC was not going to be lynched. Choices were basically Sandro and Toad and a non-Sandro vote is consistent with his D1 behaviour.
After the lynch he makes a couple of posts accusing various people of being scum, but his activity drops off and he never follows up with actions. I will have to look at VE and SnB's filters to see if there's any associative tells, but Zbo's filter doesn't give me much to work with.
At the moment I am liking the test. Austin healing H1 seems like a pretty good idea. H1 is an unlikely target for other protection and I think he's probably town. Lets see if he can get that heal.
Back to deciding between CJ and risk which one is worse. CJ will always be bad. Risk could be useful, he just isn't right now. I find that rather offensive considering I'm one of the only reasons why we even got a lynch this cycle. Let's pretend that this was both verifiable and true. What era will give us another lynch? Unless you know something we don't, you're talking out of your ass like you always do.
We will prove this post game or next cycle when it isn't a lynch.
The nos -
65,000,000 BC (Changed my mind since we have unfinished business but doesn't impact the story)
600 AD (SO MANY MONSTERS)
The Maybes -
2300 AD (Should have the plants in the domes this time IIRC)
12,000 BC (While dangerous we probably need to go there to weaken Lavos and actually win the game and I can guarantee a success with a Chipotle ham sandwhich with pancakes as bread drizzled with syrup)
End Of Time (Yeah I've argued this enough)
|
On December 06 2012 08:16 Acrofales wrote:Show nested quote +On December 06 2012 07:15 CaveJohnson wrote:
<snip>
12,000 BC (While dangerous we probably need to go there to weaken Lavos and actually win the game and I can guarantee a success with a Chipotle ham sandwhich with pancakes as bread drizzled with syrup)
This sounds disgusting, but made me giggle. Does this depend on you being in the party? If so, it's not going to happen. Also, are you targetable this cycle? I want to mason chat you. You're bound to be more fun than anybody else here and the tactical value of my mason chat is near 0, so I might as well waste it on enabling skype convos with you WITHOUT Hassy.
Nope I hit someone they gain the item and they go on the mission. I can use this on anyone.
For being targetable, yes I am annoyingly since I don't have ghost walk available this cycle (Toss up between incinerate or the success modifying sandwich)
also hassy was amazing even if she was a two timing whore 
|
On December 06 2012 08:33 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On December 06 2012 08:23 Acrofales wrote:
I can see no pattern based on era. Also no pattern based on "can only roleblock whom he damaged". Mind explaining a bit more? Maybe we can compromise and I could clear things up if you would reveal your "secondary win condition"  @Cave....still no 16 role claims?
Its less than 16 due to role blocks but I think all of them are in my filter bar 1 maybe
|
On December 06 2012 08:48 Promethelax wrote:Show nested quote +On December 06 2012 08:45 CaveJohnson wrote:On December 06 2012 08:33 kitaman27 wrote:On December 06 2012 08:23 Acrofales wrote:
I can see no pattern based on era. Also no pattern based on "can only roleblock whom he damaged". Mind explaining a bit more? Maybe we can compromise and I could clear things up if you would reveal your "secondary win condition" @Cave....still no 16 role claims? Its less than 16 due to role blocks but I think all of them are in my filter bar 1 maybe can you put all your claims in one post. For my own piece of mind. Thanks. If you do this I will help you try to take us to Antiquity instead of 600.
Eurgh I can't follow that mess can't you just take my notes
Lightning shield - May be worth using
Firestorm - worthless
Chaos meteor - worthless
Ghost walk - WHY DIDN'T I USE THIS INSTEAD OF EMP
Disarm - Usable but not a priority
Incinerate - use if gonna be lynched
Deafening blast - use if not going to be lynched (let thread decide though)
Betrayal - No idea what it did
Cold snap - Probably roleblocked him
EMP - Terrible Terrible damage
Tornado - That will teach him
Levitation - Floating in the air....
|
Actually I probably should of left incinerate out of that...
|
On December 06 2012 09:11 kitaman27 wrote:
So do those names actually have descriptions or do you just have to guess?
They do but I don't want to give out the ones I haven't used yet (with the exception of deafening blast for obvious reasons)
|
|
|
On December 06 2012 15:05 Promethelax wrote:
I promised draz:
## unvote
## vote: risk
## epoch antiquity
Do you want the sandwich?
Remember it hurts you as well so if your low on hp don't say yes
|
|
|
We still have the sandwich to discuss you know...
|
On December 07 2012 06:10 Acrofales wrote:Show nested quote +On December 07 2012 05:24 CaveJohnson wrote:
We still have the sandwich to discuss you know... What's there to discuss? You are claiming that if you use it on someone in the party we cannot fail the event. That seems ridiculous. However, I don't see much harm in it either. I am not opposed to having Prom on a party and if the party fails, you are next on the chopping block. It's pretty simple.
Fine with me
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
