EPTAcme Mini Mafia, Inc - Page 5
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
Promethelax, mkfuba please listen to me. The case against me is too weird. Half the town doesn't give a crap what I am, they just want to kill me, you must see it. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On November 11 2012 11:46 thrawn2112 wrote: yeah i'd like to know as well @risk your best bet is to make a case on someone that doesn't include setup speculation. or if it does include setup speculation it better be a damning case. DarthPunk is damned. Jesus christ I can't for the love of me understand how you can be this reckless with a game that's unlooseable if you just use your head. You can't believe there are 2 Jailors 1 Roleblocker, 1 1-shot Jailor, 1 1-shot Roleblocker, 1 1-shot cop and scum with no roleblocker, you just can't! | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
Like how you said that how I came to the realisation that you had to be the final scum was just dirtflinging untill something stuck. Get real, all scumhunting is you investigate possibillitys untill you find something. That I was stressed and worried over my mislynch which could have disastrous concequences for town (clicky) and as such posted alot without first thinking it through is not the same as dirtflinging. It might had been fair to accuse me of that if any of you had actually been here to shut down my ideas before I moved on myself. The rest of you, If you want to belive we have 6 blues and DP is telling the truth, then you can lynch me becaue you don't desserve to win. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On November 12 2012 00:36 DarthPunk wrote: C9++ DDDD = 2 Doctors + 1-Shot Doctor BB = Roleblocker + 1-Shot Roleblocker C = 1-Shot Cop This setup is a valid c9++ setup. We are using a modified version of this. That is all we know. We have no idea how it was modified. They may be a framers, Their may be an extra goon. There may be a scum roleblocker. I don't know. What I do know is that the claims we have are in line with C9++ and therefore I do not want to go around lynching every blue claim just for claiming blue. There are other ways in which to find scum. Scum hunting for example. Something which you have done little of. All you have done is tunnelled prom for shit reasons for which I called you out on day one. And then burst into activity when you are set to be lynched. There is a massive case on you which you have not adequately addressed. All you have done is speculated on the set-up in order to stave off your lynch. I welcome a case against me that does not include set up speculation. But I feel that I deserve more than your rants that I must be fake claiming when that is clearly untrue. And a simple google search would have told you as much. Nice, but wait that's a lie because that setup doesn't have an SK. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
This is what happend. You tried to pull an advanced fakeclaim and failed miserable. But thanks to that I can't convince the towne of your guilt before I die, nice job being a kingmaker for the SK. Here is the story, you decided when you got roleblocker that you would use it to claim Jailor. However claiming jailor could get you killed by the SK which is why you've panicked everytime claiming have been discussed. The other thing that could ruin your claim is if someone you roleblocked died. Which is why you haven't protected people with a risk of dying. Prom was not a likely target night 1 hyaving just replaced in. The second night you once again protect a target with no risk of dying, however you claim you did it with the intention to stop KP. Which is the worst possible way to use a jailer role. Third night you didn't protect Acrofales with bullshitreasons you didn' think he would be the one to be killed. Your nightactions are so obvious, oh and they just happen to be in line with the suspected mafia roleblocks. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
You haven't the tiniest opinion. Yes I am the apathetic player. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
You don't want the setup to be figured out so everyone can see how full of ¤&# you are. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On November 20 2012 23:29 Acrofales wrote: Well, that seems more the problem of Muso's claim, and town's unfamiliarity with his gambit in general than my counterclaim. Would you have killed muso at night if his claim had gone uncontested? Do you think we would have gotten a scumlynch D1, or a more informative wagon, if I had not counterclaimed? There was some suspicion on Drazak, but I feel scum could easily have pushed the D1 lynch to Release or Kush (although of course nobody knows what D1 would've looked like if I hadn't counterclaimed). In other words: if nobody had contested the mason claim, would his gambit have had the desired effect? From your qt it is clear you didn't shoot Mattchew because you thought he was blue, but rather because you were afraid of a veteran player like him. Which reminds me: risk, why did you shoot Zealos. It seems a strange choice for an SK to off. Were you worried about protection on the more vocal players? Or were you trying not to weaken town too much? There were no benefits for you or Muso to fakeclaim mason. It was a dumb thing to do. I shot Zealos because I was afraid of cops and I thought he was blue. | ||
| ||
