EPTNewbie Mini Mafia XXVII - Page 8
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On September 22 2012 06:23 kushm4sta wrote: thrawn at the time I didn't like the no lynch confusion argument but I don't think I ever fully understood it. that was atreides who suggested no lynch, not remedy | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
here here here here there's also stuff that's been recently said about him by myself and dandel | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
First time here | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On September 22 2012 08:36 kushm4sta wrote: Look at these two quotes: This regarding my case against him. (The only case I didn't understand was the atreides one. Because it was convoluted as fuck.) These two quotes, the "or are you scum" quotes I would expect from an aggressive newb, but thrawn's meta is none of those things. @thrawn what is the purpose of these questions? Are they jokes or what? The last quote is sorta joking but they're both serious opinions/questions. Your ability to follow my logic this game has been even worse than in our previous games so either you're somehow just failing to understand things I type or you're scum and trying to downplay them. You even came into the thread talking how baked you were and you made a bunch of confusing/contradictory posts about the boredom claim of rethos. Like they were so contradictory/confusing I thought you either still must be high or you're scum trying to create confusion. So yeah... that's why I keep asking if you're confused about my posts/high. (Perhaps you are right and my cases have just made no sense at all but if that's true then I'm concerned for my mental health.) The only other option is that you're trying to discredit my cases by saying they don't make sense and that you're scum. No offense but honestly I believe the former to be true and for some reason you're being more dense this game than usual.... maybe some breakdown in communication between us has occurred? Honestly you are the hardest person in the thread to reason with because you act like an asshole whenever people are suspicious of you or disagree with you. Not just this game but all of them. I've somewhat responded in kind this game because it's gotten annoying so how about we just leave emotions out of it from now on? Basically, the less angry/negative emotions you put into your posts, the better for everyone involved. | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
I could switch to remedy. I've been thinking over the fact that my #1 scumread (rethos) is most suspicious of my #2 (remedy) scumread but I don't really know what to make of it, at least until 1 of them flips. And kush I don't think stutters would be a bad choice (lurker policy in effect here) but don't see myself voting for him unless the vote count ends up being super spread out among lots of candidates or something similarly controversial. My stutters vote would be because of the post timing I pointed out and because of lurker policy. However you yourself said your case against him was weak, I'm assuming at some point you're going to try and make a vote based on a stronger case? Lurker policy has its place but I don't see why it should be put into effect with so much time left before deadline. | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
uh... noted? lol | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
I don't think atreides should be a lynch candidate. The stuff I just posted is enough for me to not have a scumread on him anymore. He has been lurking but if we have to go for a lurker stutters is a much better choice. | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
So if all the follwoing is true, Stutters has to be scum 1: At least 1 mafia voted for drazak 2: There are no holes we've overlooked in sharrant's mason claim 3: My reasoning about kush's vote is extremely likely to be correct (4: and an additional one for people other than myself would be that thrawn is town) For me of course 4 is 100 true. 2 is so close to 100 percent true it may as well be 100 percent. Then I think 3 is the next most likely and 1 is probably the part of the theory I have the most hesitations about. However I think 1 and 3 are solid enough. So in other words I think stutters is a pretty damn good lynch option. Not only for all the reasons just mentioned but also because he's a huge lurker. | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On September 22 2012 13:59 kushm4sta wrote: K so the questions everyone needs to answer: who is your biggest scumread? are you willing to hop on a stutters bandwagon? rethos/dandel, and after that either remedy or stutters. remedy was my #2 but after doing the research for my last post stutters has moved up the scum radar a lot higher so as of now idk which of them I'd put in the #2 spot. And yes I would definitely vote stutters but not right not unless rethos isn't getting lynched. | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On September 22 2012 14:06 kushm4sta wrote: @thrawn Why is it a sure thing that 1 scum voted for drazak? How sure are we about the sharrant mason claim actually? I know before I said blah blah 100% why are we even talking about it, but recently i've been thinking. I only thought it was very unlikely they were scum because of the risk. Then their towniness was confirmed by the chat log timestamps. Does it actually confirm them because I pretty much just saw the timestamps and took other people's word for it without even looking at them. The one scum voting for drazak is def the weakest part but I can't remember a single mislynch I've been a part of where there weren't ANY mafia who voted for the town guy. And for me the timestamps was the thing that pretty much forced me into accepting them as masons. Here's the post I did about them. If you want to check my research yourself, or do additional research beyond the 2 timestamps I looked up, then the list of timestamps are on that page I linked you and sharrant posted the timezone for them as well. The qt chat long is on the previous page. I started looking up the times and referencing them with events that took place in the thread and the first 2 came up clean. I noticed it had taken me quite a long time to convert timezones, and read through the thread to see if the qt posts matched up. If sharrant had made them up, then it would have taken him a good amount of time to fake them so cleanly. Then I realized that he had posted the time stamps 5 minutes after I asked for them which would be an inhuman time for them to have been fabricated. The only ways I can see that falling apart is if A) the two events I looked up happened to be the only ones he managed to guess correctly (he would have had like 20 seconds to spend guessing at each one) or B) he made the timestamps a long time before I asked for them. If A is true well then fuck me for being so unlucky. You can go do the research yourself and try out different posts than I did or I'll even do it if you're lazy and doubting A is true. I don't think B is likely because if he faked them a long time before I asked then why wouldn't he have included them in the original qt post? | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
Lots of people have been making those arguments this whole game and I actually start getting suspicious when I see them. At best it gives a null read on your true intentions. | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On September 22 2012 14:30 JacobStrangelove wrote:(who is yourharry?) lol go ask goodkarma | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On September 22 2012 14:36 sharky246 wrote: I was thinking that maybe all three of you (kushm4sta, thrawn2112 and stutters695) are mafia (got nothing against you personally). I mean afterall, it is in the best interest of the mafia to lynch a townie. But to think that that is the case is abit too simplistic, albeit a possibility. I know that everyone thinks of you as confirmed mason and all that but since you've joined the theory you just posted (about thinking 3 mafia voted for drazak) has been the most extensively thought out idea you've posted. Do you have any other ideas or reads? You shouldn't just leave it all the work up to sharrant. | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On September 22 2012 14:35 JacobStrangelove wrote: uhh ok... It's an inside joke for people who were around during my first game (so I guess only the hosts) but if you really want to know just go read the obs qt for newbie game XXIV lol. | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On September 22 2012 14:14 kushm4sta wrote: wait if it's plurality vote why do we even need a backup plurality lynch doesn't mean you should only vote your top scumread. marv explained it pretty well here | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On September 22 2012 15:02 JacobStrangelove wrote: Ok lol I actually pm'd him so... LOL dear lord you are going to get an entertaining response | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
| ||
