EPTAnd you claimed JK within ~10 hours in our past adventure together.
So you definetly deserve a lot of flame.
Newbie Mini Mafia XXVII - Page 66
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
And you claimed JK within ~10 hours in our past adventure together. So you definetly deserve a lot of flame. | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
You attack atreides, dandel, and then me all in one day. Now, I'm obviously the scummiest? your main point against me is my defense post. The part about defending the last poster lynch was something that sonic admitted being mistaken about after i kept explaining it to him. The rest is stuff that you called a no read in the beginning. Now, when i accuse you of scum yiu finally change your opinion of the matter? That doesnt make sense. In fact it feels OMGUS to me. . I said early on I was going through your filter. I did it to double check my early claim of you. I went trhiugh your whole filter, writing down your significant posts. At the end, i looked back at all of it put together. Itd all be way coincidental. I find it highly unlikely that the mafia would defend one of their own at this point of the game. That would be a stupid thing to risk. | ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
On September 26 2012 05:37 debears wrote: @Thrawn You attack atreides, dandel, and then me all in one day. Now, I'm obviously the scummiest? your main point against me is my defense post. The part about defending the last poster lynch was something that sonic admitted being mistaken about after i kept explaining it to him. The rest is stuff that you called a no read in the beginning. Now, when i accuse you of scum yiu finally change your opinion of the matter? That doesnt make sense. In fact it feels OMGUS to me. . I said early on I was going through your filter. I did it to double check my early claim of you. I went trhiugh your whole filter, writing down your significant posts. At the end, i looked back at all of it put together. Itd all be way coincidental. I find it highly unlikely that the mafia would defend one of their own at this point of the game. That would be a stupid thing to risk. How do you explain Jacob The Defender Of Worlds, then? | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
One more thing. Of course i have doubts. I don't know 100% if you're scum. But the evidence against you makes too much sense. You are the best candidate. That's why i am voting for you | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
if you are town wouldn't you know that you're not scum? "if i were mafia" defenses come from mafia players | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
On September 18 2012 22:42 debears wrote: To me, thrawn is giving a town read at this point. + Show Spoiler + thrawn2112 Yeah I agree, there's not much else to add other than that lurkers are assholes and they are going to lurk whether there is strong support of a lurker lynch policy or not... especially in these newbie games. So on to more important matters, here's an idea: last person in the thread gets lynched A couple of you (SDM for instance) are concentrating at how stupid an idea lynching the last person is. Let's look at motivations for this: 1) Thrawn as town - prevent the lurker discussion from going overboard. Present an idea that should provoke an "you're an idiot" response from town members (with a long shot of some mafia jumping on him about the idea). 2) Thrawn as mafia - Put up an idea that a thinking town would take seriously, make himself look suspcicious. Possibly lynch the most inactive player if it works. The idea has far superior town motives. remember that Thrawn didn't linger on the idea. He dropped it after the responses were pretty clear on it. SDM did + Show Spoiler + Sonic Death Monkey Sweden. September 18 2012 15:12. Is this question serious? I think Thrawn has sufficiently answered the question. I also believe that thrawn's defense of kush earlier was not indicative of scum. + Show Spoiler + thrawn2112 United States. September 18 2012 12:36. Posts 1077 So him having that anti-lurker opinion is not anything that would be a strong tell in either the town or mafia direction The argument that Remedy was more of a shot in the dark, seeing as all of us hate lurkers. Thrawn dismissed a possibly dumb argument before a giant flame war started (kush did give warning earlier). I also support thrawn's logic with drazak: + Show Spoiler + thrawn2112 United States. September 18 2012 14:45. Posts 1077 On September 18 2012 13:49 drazak wrote: I'm already accused of being trashy town? Really Kush? Man, you're prejudiced right off the bat. I know you can post while you're at work and stuff, but I can't post in class and I can't post when I'm tutoring people. If you'd like I can sleep-post and it'll be really bad. Sorry if my posts last game weren't up to your posting standard kush. For the record, I might not post consistently at different times, and maybe I'll push agressively against someone, my reasons will usually be good. I'd ask that people use their own logic after reading my posts, look at the evidence provided and use your logic. Last game we had a lot of people not thinking for themselves, I'll be going to bed soon so don't expect another post from me. I'll probably post in the morning, and I think I'll post before tutoring, but I don't think I'll be posting until maybe this time tomorrow again after that. My thoughts while reading this: "man this guy is going out of his way to defend himself when there's no need to" Thrawn is currently not timid about calling people out within reason. To add to the argument, drazak's post also sounds indecisive. might, maybe, probably, think. While that alone is not anywhere near enough to condemn someone, it does raise suspicion on drazak. I think thrawn is town. Anyone with evidence pointing otherwise, please present. Here is the post i made. Note how the main part of my post is my take of the accusations against you about the lurker post that you made. It was a main discussion point of the time, as you have pointed out. The rest was a few sentences on other posts you made that read town. It was an early post. In no way was it a "thrawn is a confirmed town" poin. It was simply a read. thinking back I was probably just glad that somebody else was agreeing with me when nobody else was. but now.... it's pretty obvious that a town player is suspicious of everything and everyone Ok thrawn. Another contradiction from you. If you were town, Why weren't you suspicious of me. You wouldnt have been glad that someone was agreeing with you. You would have been suspicious of me. | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On September 19 2012 03:42 thrawn2112 wrote:About debears: I'll read his filter and point out what I think about it, but for now the thing that struck me as odd was the line: I don't see why he is making it such a huge goal for town to establish if I am 100% town or not. Seems a little too off topic from the whole scumhunting thing. Other than that I said I had a null to townish read on you. So yes. I did think it was suspicious of how much you were going out of your way to talk about me being town, but other than that I had a null-town read. | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
have you never changed your mind about anything? and why can't I find one thing a little suspicious but not see any problems with the rest of it | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
| ||
|
Atreides-
United States103 Posts
If thrawn flips red, I have a strong feeling that debears will be town. He was the first to join me against thrawn. Without his post and vote I don't think the bandwagon would be nearly as strong right now. What we should think about, though, is what to do after thrawn flips red. Killing and dandel joined the bandwagon late, and without any input of their own. Jacob has posted a lot but has said little of importance. I think jacob looks the worst out of these three, skimming through the past game he was town and more confident in his opinions. | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
or even jacob for that matter. No clue at all why'd he'd vote for kush when we're at mylo and kush is like the least likely person to be lynched. other than sharky of course. well maybe not. | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On September 26 2012 06:21 Atreides- wrote:What we should think about, though, is what to do after thrawn flips red. oh dear lord what you should be thinking about is if you should be lynching thrawn | ||
|
Atreides-
United States103 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On September 26 2012 06:28 Atreides- wrote: haha, well that's just a matter of opinion not if you're town? | ||
| ||
