Vote count!

RemedySC (6) - thrawn2112, kushm4sta, KillingTime, Dandel Ion, Sharrant, JacobStrangelove
Dandel Ion (2) - ~~KillingTime~~, ~~thrawn2112~~, ~~JacobStrangelove~~, debears, ~~Sharrant~~, Sharky246
Stutters695 (1) - ~~kushm4sta~~, ~~Sharrant~~, ~~kushm4sta~~, ~~Dandel Ion~~, RemedySC
JacobStrangelove (0) - ~~kushm4sta~~
debears (0) - ~~Dandel Ion~~

Currently RemedySC is set to be lynched with 6 votes. Deadline in just over 1 hour.
Stutters695, Atreides have yet to vote.

thrawn2112

United States6918 Posts

September 22 2012 22:51 GMT

#922

On September 23 2012 07:41 kushm4sta wrote:
@thrawn well if its true you are town and you have doubts about me, isn't that more of a reason to vote stutters

Lynch a player to get a read on another player that would be based on the idea that there is 1 mafia who voted for drazak? Seems like poor reason to not vote my scumread. No scum could have voted drazak or you and stutters could both be scum.

kushm4sta

United States8878 Posts

September 22 2012 22:58 GMT

#923

but your scumreads are always wrong thrawn.

kushm4sta

United States8878 Posts

September 22 2012 23:02 GMT

#924

and you weren't even talking about remedy until killing randomly brought him up. you were talking dandel/ stutters,

debears

United States2516 Posts

September 22 2012 23:02 GMT

#925

@Atreides

On September 23 2012 07:40 Atreides- wrote:
ugghhh

Stutters is a bad vote, right now I don't feel comfortable lynching him without him posting more. I think that his lurking is him genuinely being busy rather than intentional (due to his lurking last game. he once went 2-3 days without a post).

After my last post I would have felt strong about voting thrawn, I think I made a good case against him but it was pretty much swept under the rug. Seems like I'm alone here, and there's no chance of him getting votes. However at the very least I suggest looking into my post and his filter...being active doesn't make you town.

Dandel doesn't come off as scummy to me yet, and I posted earlier why I didn't buy the case against rethos. He's open to lynching debears, stutters, remedy, and possibly another lurker. Meaning if he's mafia it's less likely for these others to be mafia as well.

Remedy...I think he's a last resort lynch at best. I can't make any reads off him. His activity is in line with what he said his work schedule would be. His posts are too short, he votes without explanation, and his arguments don't make much sense...but I have trouble differentiating this between mafia and confused town.

Atreides....you are coming in and being indecisive again....In light of the current situation...I will address this tomorrow...

@thrawn

On September 23 2012 07:51 thrawn2112 wrote:

Show nested quote +

Lynch a player to get a read on another player that would be based on the idea that there is 1 mafia who voted for drazak? Seems like poor reason to not vote my scumread. No scum could have voted drazak or you and stutters could both be scum.

What do you mean by that? I'm unsure of what exactly your saying with this. I thought you said earlier that one was scum.

thrawn2112

United States6918 Posts

September 22 2012 23:02 GMT

#926

On September 23 2012 07:58 kushm4sta wrote:
but your scumreads are always wrong thrawn.

Don't really know how to respond to that... I should not vote my reads? And I don't understand you recent thought process... You keep voting for people then having hesitations that aren't based on much... Just say your damn reads lol

kushm4sta

United States8878 Posts

September 22 2012 23:05 GMT

#927

1 Jacob
2 thrawn
them my reads. I have been hesitant because no one wants to.vote for.my reads

thrawn2112

United States6918 Posts

September 22 2012 23:06 GMT

#928

Debears: lush tellse me to vote for stutters in order to get a beter read on himself... I was pointing out the ways that falls apart. For example they could both be scum, or less likely neither of them

thrawn2112

United States6918 Posts

September 22 2012 23:08 GMT

#929

Lush I really don't know if I trust your read on me cuZ seems like a few hours ago you thought I was town. You seem to go back and forth a lot on everything this game

kushm4sta

United States8878 Posts

September 22 2012 23:09 GMT

#930

If we are both scum then you Lynch stutters a scum.

if no one is scum.. well that is possible but its also an extreme rarity.

debears

United States2516 Posts

September 22 2012 23:10 GMT

#931

@kush

No one is voting for your cases because there isn't a clear case against either right now and there is a clear case against 2 others (3 if you count stutters).

Your jacob and thrawn reads don't seem to be alone (Atreides for instance called out thrawn earlier and I thought someone had mentioned jacob). They can be addressed later. However, we need to focus on the clear cases. You and thrawn are just distractions right now. Do you have anything important to say on remedy and dandel other than being indecisive?

kushm4sta

United States8878 Posts

September 22 2012 23:13 GMT

#932

timestamps made you look town thrawn. saying you got rb make you look town. to me at the time.

however would it really be so hard for mafia to do those things?

kushm4sta

United States8878 Posts

September 22 2012 23:16 GMT

#933

also stutters could be scum.. no idea because he is a null read to me.

thrawn2112

United States6918 Posts

September 22 2012 23:16 GMT

#934

On September 23 2012 08:09 kushm4sta wrote:
If we are both scum then you Lynch stutters a scum.

if no one is scum.. well that is possible but its also an extreme rarity.

Ok that is reasonable however it's based on some unproven assumptions..... But first why not remedy

debears

United States2516 Posts

September 22 2012 23:18 GMT

#935

And @thrawn

If they are both scum, then I would think that remedy is also scum. If they are scum and they know remedy is town, then why would they distract us with this out of the blue change by Kush right before lynch?

Atreides-

United States103 Posts

September 22 2012 23:22 GMT

#936

Remedy isn't a clear case at all, he's a total crapshoot. I think it's just as likely he's a confused town instead of a mafia. I don't see how anyone can make a strong read off of what little he said. My case against thrawn is what I'd consider a strong case.

6 out of 11 people have voted for Remedy...so either all the town is convinced that he's mafia, or some of his bandwagon voters are mafia themselves.

I should have done this much earlier
##Vote: thrawn2112

The one advantage to lynching Remedy is that, even if he's town, we don't lose an important poster but we do gain good reads on the people who voted for him. In that way I prefer him over dandel.

kushm4sta

United States8878 Posts

September 22 2012 23:23 GMT

#937

last game all game long I was singling out peopels sentences and saying damn that sounds scum as fuck. and that was what my cases were based on.
that is what the cases against remedy are.

that along with what I would describe as newbish play. that does not make scum.

also how easy was that bandwagon. it happened almost instantly and their was no resistance. no one held onto their original vote or even tried to.