|
On September 21 2012 18:50 KillingTime wrote:Show nested quote +On September 21 2012 18:11 rethos wrote:
Actually no.. I am sorry to all of you. But it really seems that playing mafia is really not for me. I got bored and did not want to post any more. Now I am trying to catch up and can't get bring myself to it. Yes I lied about having this weird plan of lurking intentionally. I lurked because I did not have motivation to do anything.
Again I am really really sorry. I will ask for a replacement. If lynch lurkers is a decent policy - then Lynching liars, (even bad ones) is an essential policy ( from what I have read). I am sort of null on you because I don't see how your posts today help mafia or town at all but I can come up with plausible scenarios why both would do this - just totally barf worthy. I am not great at his game yet, but I am going to be annoyed if this is another game where d1 &2 are dominated by terrible town play. I am still going to look later and see if I can find a better scum - but for now. Vote##: rethos
@killing why would you want to policy lynch someone who wad getting replaced?
I feel like you agree that rethos wasnt scum but you are willing to Lynch him anyway.
|
On September 24 2012 03:15 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On September 24 2012 02:45 debears wrote:
Is there a possibility of more or less than 3 mafia?
Yes
what the fuck.... I also didn't realize this
|
I'm not done going through killings filter. this time I am going through real close because I never have before. but yeah I got sidetracked because this guy wanted to go to every fucking goodwill in the greater bangor area. when I get back to work I will continue my close read. but let me just say this, so car he doesn't seem non commital. he seems quite focused on the Lynch. what are actually the arguments against him? can someone do like a 1 sentence summary of each of them?
|
yeah killing you think everyone is scum but the 2 confirmed town and dabears.
|
On September 24 2012 01:06 KillingTime wrote:
Btw guys - have been reading these huge walls of text.. Not sure what I think yet about them.
On September 24 2012 04:08 KillingTime wrote:
Quickly:
I suspect atleast one of kush/you/jacob are scum. I don't know which - I haven't had time to read the huge posts made post lynch yet or really give these longer filters justice.
so at 1 you claim to be reading the huge walls of text but at 4 you claim you haven't read them yet.
Explain this contradiction please.
|
|
|
|
|
I still think Jacob and thrawn look way scummier.
granted killings low activity level gives us less to analyze.
could he be scum? yeah. am I willing to bet this game on it by lynching him next? no
|
no time to read recent stuff. have to finish all.this documentation before I leave work . if I die lynch Jacob that is all
|
pretty funny last words from sharrant.
I do think his idea about the no lynch may be good. I haven't really thought it out yet though.
Also thrawn's roleblock claim, double role block claim now. Does this make him more town or scum or what...
Who rbed him town or scum? Could he be lying and what risk would be involved in lying?
|
On September 24 2012 09:11 JacobStrangelove wrote:
So either thrawn is Sk or we don't have one (just so you know this was a joke)
maybe I'm just a dumb American but I don't get you joke
|
I'm serious Jacob explain that joke
|
not paying attention in class high as fuck logic post:
what the fuck is going on with thrawn's double rb claim?
RB PLEASE ROLECLAIM IF YOU EXIST.
Also if anyone else got roleblocked please claim.
I'm going to assume that there is no town rb.
One of the following is true
1 Scum is roleblocking town thrawn.
2 Scum thrawn knows there is no scum rb or chooses not to use it. So he is trying to take advantage of that role vacancy by pretending that scum is roleblocking him.
2 is actually a good idea but it almost seems too conspiracy theoryish to be true.
Are there other opinions on this because it's quite possible I'm missing something.
|
|
|
|
|
We do not know that there are 3 mafia.
Assuming there are though, 4 to 3 if we mislynch
3 to 3 when they nk.
3 to 2 if vig shoots scum.
Town can still win.
Therefore vig do not claim.
|
@jacob I read your wall of text and i still dont get your joke. Please explain you joke.
|
On September 25 2012 00:24 Dandel Ion wrote:Do you agree that if jacob is scum, thrawn is too (and vice versa)?
Not necessarily. I have too many null reads to have association theories like that.
Null reads
debears
atreides
killing time
Town reads
Sharky (game mvp)
Dandel (rethos leaving the game like that still strikes me as hella town)
Scum reads
Jacob
Thrawn
If so, why don't you want to go for thrawn, who people already are willing to vote for?
Are you going to push for Jacob instead?
Thrawn is big scumread from just the content of his posts. I was reading his posts today and thinking to myself fuck this guy looks scum.
Except that roleblock thing is bugging me a lot.
It's not as simple as he lied about it. The simplest answer is usually right, and I think ,just regarding the roleblock situation, it's way simpler that thrawn is town and getting rb than his scumteam is capitalizing on the lack of scum roleblock to make thrawn look town.
Could the scumteam be doing that? Yes, and thrawn even mentioned that during his first game a ton of fake roleblocks happened.
My second shred of doubt comes from me thinking about thrawn's meta. I actually don't know his meta that well I realized. I have played 2 games with him.
The first game was easy mode and ended pretty early, due to dandel's terribad mafia play.
In the second game nk the first night.
The way he is perfectly willing to throw out one case and jump to another though, it looks so scummy. Aggressively wishy washy.
Also that whole stutters fiasco. It seems like he wanted to look like he would lynch stutters but actually didn't want to lynch him. And then when stutters turns out town suddenly his "mafia always bandwagons on d1 lynch" theory is thrown out.
As soon as dandel was looking like it wasn't going to happen, he started a bandwagon for remedy after one post from killing suspecting but not voting for remedy.
So thrawn is still a scumread but I am more sure of jacob, because of my aforementioned doubts about thrawn. And I would rather lynch jacob.
|
That tired as mafia I would never post in this thread it would be INSANE.
Is that why you are taking scum notes? So you don't slip up when you are tired?
Taking notes is just an inherently scummy thing to do. Town doesn't have to try hard to keep their story straight.
Also jacob still you need to answer my question. What the fuck was that thrawn joke you posted right after the flip about? Please explain it I don't have your sophisticated European sense of humor.
Also dandel is in both your supposed scumteams? You don't even tell us what those scumteams are. Also you have never even put any heat on dandel.
Summary of my case against jacob;
Extremely wishy washy early game, contributing no original ideas.
Arguments are built like: suspect first, squeeze out a case later.
Sudden walls of text as a defense mechanism.
Not matching last game's meta. He was not a tunneler last game at all. His post lengths were consistent throughout the entire game.
|
I reread it I still think it's smart. care to enlighten me?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
