|
On August 10 2012 04:01 Lvdr wrote:
I was writing a breakdown of Yh's town claim... then I read that it got retracted. So much for that.
Given that the claim was retracted and YH (according to him) didn't know his alignment when he made the claim we cannot really draw any conclusions based on it. Any argument would be a WIFOM from YH's point of view, but even YH didn't know what his alignment was.
ok
but why did you state this
On August 09 2012 11:06 Lvdr wrote:
Both hapa and yh are mafia or both are town?
|
Do you think we should still policy lynch yourharry?
|
ebwop i was asking dandel ion
|
On August 10 2012 05:53 Hapahauli wrote:
So let's kick things off:
FOS iamperfection
I feel like you've been going with the flow so far this game. You haven't started any original suspicions and you've been alternating between criticisms of players and piggybacking off other player's suspicions. This is completely different from your town play in the aborted game, where you tunneled YH from day 1.
I believe i gave reasons already why im not gonna tunnel yourharry ಠ_ಠ
On August 09 2012 09:39 iamperfection wrote:
I think its important to remember that when i was pushing for the yourharry lynch it made more sense from my perspective.
1. i was the cop i wanted to appear to be somewhat scummy to stay alive as long as possible and gain more information.
2.i knew yourharry was not cop or and likely not any other power role since i knew i was a cop.
3. I think yourharry outside of the game has shown himself to be quite intelligent i encourage him if he is town to join us in a less chaotic tone.
And apparently trying to get people to talk more is scum motivated??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
I want people to partcipate and fully flesh out their reasoning when they do something. The more people talk in the long run i think we can find scum. I was honest with prom he has seem wierd to me on both days and i think he can partcipate more and i want him to. For your other crap i will continue to get people to talk more its not idle suspicion im throwing out its just trying to get people to talk more. I'll be hunting scum while you do whatever it is that you do.
|
On August 10 2012 07:02 Lvdr wrote:
@hapa - What do you think of my analysis of link 4 in your case?
I agree that iamperfection hasn't offered much of his own, but his play has really mirrored your own in terms of questioning many people.
@iamperfection - I encourage you to make a case of your own. While you have encouraged plenty of discussion, you haven't contributed a lot of your own analysis.
I aint going to fabricate a case just to defend myself.
|
On August 10 2012 07:09 Lvdr wrote:Show nested quote +On August 10 2012 07:06 iamperfection wrote:On August 10 2012 07:02 Lvdr wrote:
@hapa - What do you think of my analysis of link 4 in your case?
I agree that iamperfection hasn't offered much of his own, but his play has really mirrored your own in terms of questioning many people.
@iamperfection - I encourage you to make a case of your own. While you have encouraged plenty of discussion, you haven't contributed a lot of your own analysis. I aint going to fabricate a case just to defend myself. If you have no analysis to make doesn't this make you useless to the town? The idea behind lynching lurkers is that continued activity makes it very difficult for mafia to hide. In this case you are refusing to put yourself out there; essentially that would make you a lurker.
Very well you want some orginal content?
On August 10 2012 06:05 Lvdr wrote:
@hapa I don't think the case you're making against iamperfection is really scummy.
link 1: iam clearly does not trust yh, especially given what happened last game. understandable.
link 2: he is looking for more information. yes he doesn't offer an opinion, but it seems like a null read, not scummy.
link3: as you said he missed the joke spoiler. null read.
link 4: confirms that he missed the spoiler mentioned in link 3 and shows a proportional amount of suspicion on me. reads town to me because mafia have no interest in encouraging me to mount a good defense.
link 5: follows his established pattern of encouraging others to put out more information and reads.
This reads as a very flimsy case and even a bit of a reach.
Lvdr defends me because he knows im town in hopes that i will go after someone else. Lvdr then encourages me to make new case in hopes to get attention on someone else.
there you go
## Vote LVDR
|
i am so glad to have gained 1 point on lvdr's town scoreboard. (this post contains sarcasm)
|
On August 11 2012 04:29 Hapahauli wrote:
To be honest, I'm shocked at how little attention that Axero is getting. He's laying low and has demonstrated some clear anti-town behavior. Some players have mentioned having suspicions of him, but no one has so much as FOS'd him.
Go with me a bit here:
If Axero was town, wouldn't he be a REALLY EASY MISLYNCH FOR MAFIA? Why has NO ONE voted for him? I'm inclined to think that his mafia buddies are covering for him!
Your so called case on axerro boils down to one line to me.
On August 10 2012 09:56 Axero wrote:
Haha, no I wasn't planning on lurking. I was actually going to go ahead with my plans without checking the forum at all, but someone coaching me suggested i still check.
You have to think of like this if he is mafia his plan was to refrence coaching as a means for his defense. I find this unlikely. I am more inclined to believe that this statement was truth and if he was away there was only one way he would recieve notification from a coach. He was pm'ed and i think this statement
On August 10 2012 10:03 Axero wrote:My friend who introduced me to mafia told me 
after he received another pm after being scolded for refrencing coaching. Thats what determines it for me.
|
On August 11 2012 04:45 Hapahauli wrote:
after he received another pm after being scolded for refrencing coaching. Thats what determines it for me.
There's nothing in the rules against referencing coaching. I confirmed this with one of the hosts this game.
[/QUOTE]
There isnt? In a previous game i refrenced coaching and got immediatly scolded so that is why i think the same thing happened to axxero.
|
On August 11 2012 04:45 Hapahauli wrote:
There's nothing in the rules against referencing coaching. I confirmed this with one of the hosts this game.
ebwop
There isnt? In a previous game i refrenced coaching and got immediatly scolded so that is why i think the same thing happened to axxero.
|
On August 11 2012 05:33 Axero wrote:
EBWOP:
@ Hapa
If I were scum, how would it benefit me to fos you? Surely there's easier people to go after that wouldn't bring so much attention to myself.
Get that wifom shit out of here. I know almost everthing can be wifom but come on.
|
On August 11 2012 05:38 Hapahauli wrote:Show nested quote +On August 11 2012 05:35 iamperfection wrote:On August 11 2012 05:33 Axero wrote:
EBWOP:
@ Hapa
If I were scum, how would it benefit me to fos you? Surely there's easier people to go after that wouldn't bring so much attention to myself. Get that wifom shit out of here. I know almost everthing can be wifom but come on. Funny thing is, ge isn't "going after" me. He's just casting idle "gut-feeling" suspicion on me.
????
|
|
|
alright im gonna be working on the votecount. if someone could check me if i make a mistake please.
|
Vote count
Mkfuba07
1. yourharry Yourharry
LVDR
4.mkfuba07,iamperfection, Axero, Sideni
Sideni
4.Lvdr , dandel ion, promthelax, good karma
Dandel Ion
0. Sideni
Axero
0.Hapa refresh ftw
|
someone check me plz i think im right
|
oh there we go i think were right dandel ion
|
|
|
|
|
On August 11 2012 05:49 Dandel Ion wrote:
with 12 people, it should take 7 to lynch, but it says 6 in the day1 post? So we could in theory lynch 2?
I think the person that gets to 6 first would be lynched
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
