EPTMad Men Mafia - Page 5
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On August 08 2012 08:51 s0Lstice wrote: VE, help me out a little here yea? I'd like to know what your scum read on Zeph is all about. I'm writing my final case on Erandorr and I'll answer you shortly. Give me just a sec. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
Erandorr, Scum's Highly Volatile Mason Erandorr's entrance into the game has been gone over and over, but I want to stress this. There is no town-motivated reason for masoning Bugs after Bugs immediately outed me as mason if he felt that masons should not claim or be kept secret This is huge, and it's being overlooked by the vast majority of the players in this game. His primary contention with Bugs was the fact that he outted us as masons. This means that he felt that our roles were sacred - that the information we had (knowledge of our roles) was worth keeping a secret from scum. But instead of calling Bugs out on this behavior when it was exhibited (read: when he outed me as mason), he masoned Bugs instead. Why? To what end? He claims that his intention was "to see if he'd do it again". ….why? What's the point of that? He's done it once, isn't that enough? He claims that if he hadn't, then he would have simply asked why he did it. But…that doesn't make any sense either does it? Because if he was going to ask that when he outed ONLY me as mason, why would the same question not be valid after outing both of us as masons? And in what way does Bugs' move to out ONE of us as mason and not the other make ANY MORE SENSE than outing both of us as masons? It doesn't. It's all a bunch of bullshit. Next, go through and try and find some of Erand's reads. Go on, I can wait. ... ... ... That's right - he mentions NO ONE. NOT ONE SOUL other than WBG until his second to last post. Why? OH THAT'S BECAUSE I'VE NOW SHONE THE LIGHT ON HIM. He'll attest that he's had a spotlight on him all this time, but that's not TECHNICALLY true is it? The spotlight has been on wherebugsgo, NOT Erandorr. Know how I know? Because not one person has brought up the fact that Erandorr has done fuck-all but tunnel Bugs besides Bugs all fucking game. I can't spell it out ANY clearer for you guys. If you want to lynch me, that's fine. I'll take the loss. Because I FUCKING KNOW that when I flip town, you'll immediately about face and then vote for Bugs, NOT Erandorr. And town will lose. If you want to win however, then unvote me and vote for Erandorr. We remove a scum mason from the game, we don't lynch me (  ) and I get to lobby for Bugs' and my life for another day.A vote for Erandorr is a vote for Town Victory!! | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On August 08 2012 09:22 s0Lstice wrote: as it stands right now, I think Eran is set to be lynched anyway. Plurality right? The problem I have with Erandorr stems from what bugs says about him. He calls him scum in all the games they are in together, regardless of evidence. It doesn't surprise me therefore that in this game, where he has a blue-ish role, that it was targeted at bugs. If he was a vig, he'd have shot him. If he was a DT, he would have checked him. If he was mason...etc etc. This would all be done regardless of information in the thread that ran counter to his read on bugs. Except the point is not that he targeted Bugs alone - it's that he targeted Bugs knowing he would out him as mason. He can say he didn't know Bugs would do that all he wants, but he claims the reason he did it was to see if he'd do it again, implying that he saw him do it once before. I can't imagine that he would think Bugs would out me as mason and not him - he had to know what Bugs was going to do. @Bugs If Erand flips town, I'll literally eat my hat. ( ) | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/yyQGql.jpg) | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
Scum - that was from before the game started. WUT | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On August 09 2012 08:04 talismania wrote: yeah but you implied you were going to do something about it. "make up for my folly tonight" etc Yes.....and? | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
The night isn't over talis. What's your deal? You're still sore about the Zephirdd thing aren't you?  I can assure you it will all be revealed in time, don't worry sir. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On August 09 2012 08:27 talismania wrote: I kinda think WBG is scum and he's been preparing his own demise for a long time now. D3 is a good bus timing. ![[image loading]](http://www.insidehoops.com/forum/images/smilies/biggums.png) | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
VisceraEyes Thoughts, And Lack Thereof I'm gonna open with the important stuff. talismania, Zephirdd, Toadesstern Yes, that's right - THREE names. Not Five. Why? Because in my opinion, the last 2 scums can be found in the pool of players who haven't been posting, like, at all. There have been too many town flips of active players for me to entertain the notion that ALL of the scum are playing visibly. Therefor, at least 40% of the scum team can, by my estimation, be found in that group. Now, my reads. talismania has been very confusing to me over the course of the game. After D1 I agreed with slOosh's points on talismania - lots of questions that seemed to go nowhere, very little what I would consider actual scum hunting. However, D2 talis turned on the town with a bright and shiny case on me. Generally speaking, I automatically think "SCUM!" in cases like that, as many of you are well aware - however this time it was different. This time, talismania had valid concerns about my activity and my case against him…and considering my main contention with him was about the whole questions that go nowhere thing, I decided to assent to masoning him. That's where things changed, for me. Over the course of those conversations, I was left with the feeling that he wasn't REALLY after information at all - that he was looking for something specific…something that I'd referenced earlier in the game. All Talismania was interested in during the WHOLE of our conversations was my read on Zephirdd. Why? What about Zephirdd was so important for me to comment on? What about my Zephirdd read intrigued him so? So I tried something out… I intentionally avoided talking about Zephirdd at all. :OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO Here is the result of this experiment. + Show Spoiler + On August 07 2012 12:06 talismania wrote: VE you out there? waiting for a pm reply. On August 08 2012 02:38 talismania wrote: The extent of my communication with VE. Yes I wanted to more or less interrogate him about every player in the game, I think he's scum. Never really got to though. If he's innocent he shouldn't have a problem with that and should also probably want to interrogate me about a lot of things. He never responded to my zephirdd question despite posting in the thread after I had sent it, so I asked him in the thread. + Show Spoiler + Removed per request of host - for full logs in text form see this post: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=352668¤tpage=57#1127 On August 08 2012 03:24 talismania wrote: How is this a town attitude, toad? He writes this, but do you see it in the logs? He asked me about erandorr, I responded. I asked him about zephirdd after he brought zephirdd's name up... and nothing. If he had asked what I thought about zeph I would have gladly answered. He only showed interest in picking my brain about erandorr. The "people" I asked about? I only asked about one, and he never answered. I asked a grand total of two questions of him in PMs as they "dragged on". On August 08 2012 06:28 talismania wrote: ah sorry. I would argue that they are all around the same level of interest to be honest. Whatever happened to your thoughts on xsebt and zephirdd? You said in PMs you were going to look into them yesterday. WHO CARES?! He's barely playing and is probably scum! But if he doesn't do scummy things then I can't lynch him! talismania, in an attempt to distract town, has focused on my read of Zephirdd for almost an entire cycle. If he thinks I'm scum and Zeph is town, what could he possibly want to know what I think of Zephirdd for? Here's my theory: that he and Zephirdd are scum TOGETHER. I think he was interested in getting my read on Zephirdd in the thread to either vilify me for thinking an "obvious townie" is scum, or to solidify sentiment that he's town when I died D2 and flipped town by me stating a town-read on him. My guess is that scum roleblocked someone they killed N1 and talis claimed it in an attempt to gain town-cred. Zephirdd has spent the whole of the second cycle being pressured by CD. The result of this pressure, I think, speaks for itself - but I'll speak for it for those of you who are wondering what I'm talking about. He reacted BADLY. REALLY badly. Like, as a townie, how would you react to someone continually calling you scum based on nothing and trolling you? If your answer is anything but "ignore it and hunt scum" then you're scum. I'm sorry, but that's my opinion. Zeph's answer would apparently be "FREAK THE FUCK OUT AND RAGE IN-THREAD AND OMGUSSSSSSSSS"…if he were town. However, I think he's scum that can't handle pressure. And golly gee, he didn't vote for me, talismania's "#1 scum read". Hmmmm, I wonder what's going on here. :/ Toadesstern is on this list because he's a mason, and because I'm town the pool of possible scum masons is shrinking. Ultimately he's null, but I'm thinking scum probably have a mason and I don't think it's JH - especially after reading his logs with talismania. It's possible there ARE no scum masons and BC threw in a ton of town masons to fuck with town - but I find it really unlikely, and if that's what's going on here then BC is truly a bastard. So my lynch-order preference would be: 1. talismania/Zephirdd (I'm equally sure on both and would support either lynch equally. . . . . . . . . . . . 2. Toadesstern. I don't want to lynch Toad tomorrow, but I will if town wants to because he's a mason that's not JH or myself. Pretty much no other reason. :/ | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
##Vote: Zephirdd But please - if I'm mistaken and anyone agrees with me, let me know. Between the two, I prefer to lynch talis because I feel like he's more dangerous. I just think Zeph is more likely to eat rope today. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
Like you know, voting for your "scumpuppet"? I mean, can't he lead the others to you with your vote on him? | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On August 09 2012 10:34 Zephirdd wrote: rofl this vigi is bad VE, your post is funny. You think talis is most likely to be scum, but you want to lynch me? So let me get this straight, scumteam is VE+CD+Talismania+(insert 2 random players here)? Also, people arguing against wbg, learn something: LOGIC > YOU. A player has all right to get mad when he is trying to use reasoning and all you do is shit. No, as I clearly said in my post, I'm equally sure on both of you. But hey - feel free to vote for talismania if you "agree" with me there - I'll gladly take the gift. I ain't too proud to take charity. ^^ | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
Can you clarify that a bit because if it's legit I'm switching my vote... | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
I mean, there are inherent risks involved with claiming as DT...claiming through a mason doesn't really mitigate those at all, because surreptitious behavior is often regarded as scummy rather than townie regardless of the intentions - look at the Lynch All Liars policy if you have any doubts. While I would love nothing more than to lynch talismania, this smells funny. No offense Toad, it's more to do with the manner of the pseudo-claimed DT rather than any of your actions. The fact that you claimed it for him/her is pretty null to me, considering I think you're smart enough to know that claiming that in-thread would be the smart move regardless of your alignment. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
If Toad is in contact with a DT you're lynched - there's no way you're a miller. The question is if he's in contact with a DT or not. I think not. | ||
| ||
