|
My thoughts on Mattchew
On June 22 2012 14:17 Mattchew wrote:
Maybe I am being blinded by something, but I do not see how you can get a read off of Prplhz's posts so far. I can't judge him on the MrZ policy cause I completely agree with it, and I don't see anything in his posts that has an agenda. That being said, his posting is not helping town either, so that needs to shape up immediately
Terribly flaky post.
On June 23 2012 04:10 Mattchew wrote:
This all feels extremely middle of the road, I am ready to jump on a bandwagon but don't want to commit to anything scum play. He also contradicts himself about the talks about Marv, then contradicts his we have 48 hours post, by posting a case that he is pretty deadset on, about risk.nuke. Overall I just feel like Rastaban's posting has been flaky and his case on Risk is bad. To answer his question to the thread, I read his vote switch that he was not confident in a Marv lynch, and that he wanted to pressure a lurker with no content. Also, his first 30ish hour case doesn't take into account that Risk.nuke has played many many games before
Which is ironic since that was his whole reason for voting for rastaban. Being wishy-washy is really a null tell for crazy newbs. I don't understand what not including risk's meta has to do with anything.
On June 25 2012 15:07 Mattchew wrote:
Prplhz's post on zeph came at a really suspicious time. He may as well have asked for a no-lynch because if his case had actually gained traction, thats what would of occurred considering the time and players available.
This is terrible terrible reasoning. Why prpl would push for a Zentor lynch all day long and then offer alternates is completely reasonable. We want people to offer their thoughts on more than one person but Mattchew finds that scummy.
I answered Snarfs question because it was asked of me. The discussion I believe had shifted away from Marv and he was no longer a lynch candidate. I don't believe that posting anything further about Marv would have helped town at that time. I will however be posting more on him in the next 24 hours while we discuss lynch candidates.
Given he started the mess this is the biggest cop out ever.
On June 26 2012 12:05 Mattchew wrote:
I find this tone (throughout the game) when in conversation with Marv to be strange. He has not ever given a reason for thinking Marv or VE is town, yet constantly lumps them together as townies arguing. All in all, I find the tone of Rastaban's posts to be hesitant and a little off. I find that his lumping of townreads on players suspicious, and he has never really responded to a single case brought up. Instead he has just safely tunneled his forced case on Risk. I want scum Rastaban dead. He barely even defends himself even though he was extremely close to being lynched which shows me he's more scum than bad town (for you prob... <3)
This is a really careful case given Mattchew has been pushing rastaban all game. There is nothing new since his first case and it is weak as hell. The language is also really soft. Using pharses like "I find", "never really", "a little off" but suddenly he wants him dead?
Never mind how this play with his other reads it is an excuse for a case.
|
i literally just got home from Abe Lincoln Vampire Hunter (7:50pm showing in Morristown NJ I have the ticket if you would like to see)...
Get a life?
I don't even see a case except for one that I responded to by Rastaban. Noone even quoted my response. This is literally fucking retarded
|
On June 27 2012 11:42 VisceraEyes wrote:
Wow, you're really gonna come in a matter of minutes before the floor drops and criticize the wagon?
Get a life Matt. :/
Don't be mean. Man you can be really spiteful when you want to.
Matt, take a look at my post. Your play has been underwhelming despite you excusing your lack of posting as a new "consolidation" style. If you play that style, your contributions should matter. You posted your cases and then disappeared to pop back in 15 minutes before the deadline. Hardly pushing for a lynch.
|
|
|
|
|
Fuck, I keep doing that 
Going to grab lunch and then take a look at xsksc.
|
On June 27 2012 11:44 Probulous wrote:My thoughts on Mattchew Show nested quote +On June 22 2012 14:17 Mattchew wrote:
Maybe I am being blinded by something, but I do not see how you can get a read off of Prplhz's posts so far. I can't judge him on the MrZ policy cause I completely agree with it, and I don't see anything in his posts that has an agenda. That being said, his posting is not helping town either, so that needs to shape up immediately Terribly flaky post. This is not flaky, its fact. Do you have a solid read on Prp based off the posts he made up until that point. Taking this early game quote out of context is super easy and super deceiving. Show nested quote +On June 23 2012 04:10 Mattchew wrote:
This all feels extremely middle of the road, I am ready to jump on a bandwagon but don't want to commit to anything scum play. He also contradicts himself about the talks about Marv, then contradicts his we have 48 hours post, by posting a case that he is pretty deadset on, about risk.nuke. Overall I just feel like Rastaban's posting has been flaky and his case on Risk is bad. To answer his question to the thread, I read his vote switch that he was not confident in a Marv lynch, and that he wanted to pressure a lurker with no content. Also, his first 30ish hour case doesn't take into account that Risk.nuke has played many many games before Which is ironic since that was his whole reason for voting for rastaban. Being wishy-washy is really a null tell for crazy newbs. I don't understand what not including risk's meta has to do with anything. I think Risk is town because of his Meta and I think almost anyone in a game with risk before should also be able to read this. Rasta ignores this. Also, my reasons are far from wishy-washy as I say the other people I would be willing to vote for. Show nested quote +On June 25 2012 15:07 Mattchew wrote:
Prplhz's post on zeph came at a really suspicious time. He may as well have asked for a no-lynch because if his case had actually gained traction, thats what would of occurred considering the time and players available. This is terrible terrible reasoning. Why prpl would push for a Zentor lynch all day long and then offer alternates is completely reasonable. We want people to offer their thoughts on more than one person but Mattchew finds that scummy. Once again, the timing of the post is being clearly taken out of context. If prp wanted Zentor to be lynched still, why post a case right before his lynch. He is in no risk of being killed after the lynch and has 24 hours of night to post his thoughts on anyone and everyone. Show nested quote +I answered Snarfs question because it was asked of me. The discussion I believe had shifted away from Marv and he was no longer a lynch candidate. I don't believe that posting anything further about Marv would have helped town at that time. I will however be posting more on him in the next 24 hours while we discuss lynch candidates. Given he started the mess this is the biggest cop out ever. Biggest Cop Out? I have commented plenty on Marv since this post. The timing of everything is what you are confusingShow nested quote +On June 26 2012 12:05 Mattchew wrote:
I find this tone (throughout the game) when in conversation with Marv to be strange. He has not ever given a reason for thinking Marv or VE is town, yet constantly lumps them together as townies arguing. All in all, I find the tone of Rastaban's posts to be hesitant and a little off. I find that his lumping of townreads on players suspicious, and he has never really responded to a single case brought up. Instead he has just safely tunneled his forced case on Risk. I want scum Rastaban dead. He barely even defends himself even though he was extremely close to being lynched which shows me he's more scum than bad town (for you prob... <3) This is a really careful case given Mattchew has been pushing rastaban all game. There is nothing new since his first case and it is weak as hell. The language is also really soft. Using pharses like "I find", "never really", "a little off" but suddenly he wants him dead? beware self meta ahead... You clearly haven't compared my town cases vs. scum cases in the pastNever mind how this play with his other reads it is an excuse for a case. Instead of saying why my cases are bad, or why the reasoning behind them suck you vaguely say they are bad. This is bad play
|
when I flip town will you please please please lynch Rastaban.
|
|
|
We'll probably lynch prplhz next, is that okay? :/
Honestly I'd rather lynch him now - we have an hour, can we make it happen?
X(
|
On June 27 2012 12:00 VisceraEyes wrote:
We'll probably lynch prplhz next, is that okay? :/
Honestly I'd rather lynch him now - we have an hour, can we make it happen?
X(
Why
On June 27 2012 12:00 Probulous wrote:
thoughts on xsksx Matt?
I will read his filter now
|
Upon extremely quickly reading xsksxI he is acting similar to me when I roll scum. He looks to be bussing his teammate rastaban, and he post his vote in hopes that noone else votes with him but then leaves it there to avoid participating in the thread, but if Rastaban were to be lynched he'd be the first to get cred for it.
Otherwise he's been useless
|
daypost might be delayed a few minutes (scheduled for 50 minutes from now).
|
On June 27 2012 12:00 VisceraEyes wrote:
We'll probably lynch prplhz next, is that okay? :/
Honestly I'd rather lynch him now - we have an hour, can we make it happen?
X(
I think marv has gone to bed so not sure it is possible and I prefer a Matt lynch. I need to do some more reading of prplhz to come to a conclusion as I think his last post could make sense when it is very late and you hate no lynches. I would the same thing unless I was positive the guy was scum. Also it is hard to stand your ground with so many other people certain someone is scum.
He might be scum but I would need more time to read his posts, I think it is a great topic for tonight or once day starts. .
|
Ebwop
I would do the same thing unless i was positive the guy wasn't scum.
|
On June 27 2012 12:14 rastaban wrote:Show nested quote +On June 27 2012 12:00 VisceraEyes wrote:
We'll probably lynch prplhz next, is that okay? :/
Honestly I'd rather lynch him now - we have an hour, can we make it happen?
X( I think marv has gone to bed so not sure it is possible and I prefer a Matt lynch. I need to do some more reading of prplhz to come to a conclusion as I think his last post could make sense when it is very late and you hate no lynches. I would the same thing unless I was positive the guy was scum. Also it is hard to stand your ground with so many other people certain someone is scum. He might be scum but I would need more time to read his posts, I think it is a great topic for tonight or once day starts. .
lol
|
Yeah that's a really bad post rastaban
|
On June 27 2012 12:18 Probulous wrote:
Yeah that's a really bad post rastaban
Care to explain why? You think a no lynch is better than a lynch when unsure? Unless I was sure someone is innocent I would much rather have a lynch.
|
On June 27 2012 12:18 Probulous wrote:
Yeah that's a really bad post rastaban
are you going to force me to post suddenly clarity memes
|
Anyone notice the amount of no-reason votes on me and then disappear acts pulled for this lynch. Its bullshit
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
