Quietly, the people gathered around the town square. Roflwaffles55 and Hopeless1der stared each other down, knowing only one would die today. The commotion and noise of the town came to a quiet cessation as the two nearly condemned men stared each other down. Equal power had been pushed onto either side, equal will to kill, equal will to die.

There was only one thing that would determine who would live to see the sun fall once more. The only thing that matters in the wild, wild west: Who's the quicker draw?

The clock rang out and both men drew, but soon only one stood. Hopeless1der was too fast, and Roflwaffles55's fate seemed sealed. There was no way he could be as fast! When all seemed lost for Roflwaffles55, Esspen came galloping into town, and fired upon Hopeless1der. His blood splattered the ground just before his corpse struck the earth.

"There's only three kinds of folk in this world, the quick, the dead, and the lucky."

Hopeless1nder the Vanilla Townie has been put to death!

Night 1 will end in ~24 hours, on Thursday, Jun 28 12:00am GMT (GMT+00:00), so please remember to send in your night actions to both Blazinghand and me by then. We are currently looking for replacements for the people who have not voted.

BassInSpace

Australia165 Posts

June 27 2012 00:02 GMT

#263

Biosc I'm nit vitiing for hopeless because the weight of your case lies on him making what you likely think is a bad case. I actually agree withvyou as here. However, a bad case by itself cou. ld just as likely be a mistaken townie as mafia. As itty if I misinterpreted your recentvposts though haven't had time to go
through properly.

Vivax

21954 Posts

June 27 2012 00:02 GMT

#264

Oh god my vote didn't get through in time -.-

BassInSpace

Australia165 Posts

June 27 2012 00:03 GMT

#265

Damn ninja at the last minute sorry I tried to rush out that post asap but my phone was not complying.

Hopeless1der

United States5836 Posts

June 27 2012 00:04 GMT

#266

Gg. Also, plurality vote...wouldn't have mattered Viva.

Vivax

21954 Posts

June 27 2012 00:05 GMT

#267

GG hopeless

BassInSpace

Australia165 Posts

June 27 2012 00:13 GMT

#268

Actually it would have he changed his vote to roflwaffle. I was actually wanted to get my vote off him after reading gis reason for nit posting but I did nit want a hopeless lynch. I will be looking at DNA later when I have time. Also esspen why the vote on hopeless? No explanation and you didn't even go with majority of town like you Saud you would. At the time it your vote, rofl was ser to be lynched, look at the voting thread.

BassInSpace

Australia165 Posts

June 27 2012 00:16 GMT

#269

Since you were reminded it is plurality lynch and you didn't need to vote with majority to get a lynch, why vote for hopeless? Your vote was the lynch changer.

BioSC

United States636 Posts

June 27 2012 00:44 GMT

#270

GG Hopeless1der.

I hope that town learns a lesson from this. Scum didn't even need to vote for Hopeless OR Rofl to get a townie lynch.

Lurkers, step up the posting. This is unacceptable.

Release

United States4397 Posts

June 27 2012 01:16 GMT

#271

I'm caught up on my reading. If i had been here b4 (deadline, impossible due to my schedule), i would have switched to Bio.

Release

United States4397 Posts

June 27 2012 01:16 GMT

#272

GG, sorry bro

Release

United States4397 Posts

June 27 2012 01:26 GMT

#273

1 post:

On June 25 2012 12:57 BioSC wrote:

Show nested quote +

Right now would be the perfect time to discuss it, seeing as we've been talking about it since game start. Now would be a good time to say some things, seeing as how you have the first vote and all.

We're discussing fucking semantics. Some people called me out. I pursued it to try to get some more emotional/scumslip material into the thread.

And what do we get? You posting this gem.
"Keep going on with your bullshit. I'll watch here while you don't post anything useful."

You actually approved of our silly time-wasting. You also managed to sheep a "more activity" attitude when the activity you were promoting was shit. I said that my vote was to generate activity, and you act like it's a serious, life-threatening vote. You also manage to avoid taking any serious stances in this post and the posts after it until your vote.

Don't try to bullshit me with "it's just one post." Scumslips are supposed to be frequent. 1 is usually enough.

BioSC

United States636 Posts

June 27 2012 01:41 GMT

#274

I stand by my case. I noticed he was constantly changing topics, and was a main point in my case against him. He reacted badly.

Why the hell would I want to add to an already useless topic? I wanted him to post more to see if he made any more scummy moves. He did, and I followed through. Sucks that he's town, but it is what it is.

I don't remember saying that it was a "Serious, life-threatening vote". It is a vote, however, and it got him nervous being under the spotlight. THAT'S on you.

Am I saying your scummy? ATM, no. But to say that his constant stance switching and bad posts were my fault is ignorant at best.

I was promoting posts. I didn't want to vote a lurker, but this game is so obviously full of them that it has to be looked into.

Release

United States4397 Posts

June 27 2012 01:45 GMT

#275

That's plausible, and honestly, i can't disagree with Hope's wishy-washy play.

But i am keeping my eye on you.

Release

United States4397 Posts

June 27 2012 01:47 GMT

#276

Am I saying your scummy? ATM, no. But to say that his constant stance switching and bad posts were my fault is ignorant at best.
________________________

Did i say it was your fault? I was pointing out what looked like promotion of useless discussion while trying to appear helpful.

Release

United States4397 Posts

June 27 2012 01:47 GMT

#277

Awfully defensive don't you think?

SS#2

BioSC

United States636 Posts

June 27 2012 01:49 GMT

#278

If you are calling me out on trying to discuss useless topics, by your own definition both he and you were doing the same.

You called it "silly time wasting" and "f***ing semantics". What is your point? I've explained why I made that post.

BioSC

United States636 Posts

June 27 2012 01:51 GMT

#279

EBWOP: I need to refresh before making posts.

BioSC

United States636 Posts

June 27 2012 02:07 GMT

#280

Either way, this is getting us nowhere. We need to go back to hunting scum. I'm just afraid that there won't be much to go off of when I look through the filters again.

Springing to mind are a couple potential targets.

Esspen - wanting to vote for himself, I called him out on it, then ends up voting to seal Hopeless' fate. I would like to know why he voted for Hopeless, and why he didn't feel like explaining the vote.

Jiexian - Vote on release early on in the cycle, on to lurking. Could be the timezone difference, could simply be a scum allowing town to mislynch. Get in here, make some reads.

<insert random lurker here> - pretty self explanatory. I would rather focus on finding at least one scum tomorrow, but if I can't, the ones who were just barely above posting limits should be looked at.

Honestly, a 4 vote lynch in a 13 player pool is just silly. It's going to be even worse if there are 2 mod kills in this game. Hopefully they find replacements and they are active.