EPTBang Bang Mafia 2
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
FreelanceSatan
36 Posts
| ||
|
FreelanceSatan
36 Posts
| ||
|
FreelanceSatan
36 Posts
| ||
|
FreelanceSatan
36 Posts
| ||
|
FreelanceSatan
36 Posts
| ||
|
FreelanceSatan
36 Posts
![[image loading]](http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_QhlYuf3Wm08/TNBNwt84ocI/AAAAAAAAAl8/gAALnWFCB8E/s1600/Tunnel.jpg) | ||
|
FreelanceSatan
36 Posts
Its funny watching you all get bent out of shape about it but its no big secret. ( and honestly its probably going to disappoint you guys if you keep getting all worked up. ) | ||
|
FreelanceSatan
36 Posts
| ||
|
FreelanceSatan
36 Posts
I think you guys need to slow down with trying to put together odd ball plans that rely on so much unknown variables and just focus on the one thing town does best. scum hunting. ( also why did chaos threaten to shoot a claimed miller when like 90% of thread is indicating that they approve of the plan on some level??) that just doesnt feel right. I would FOS chaos for that. Anyway im not a miller however.. I will volunteer to take the first shot if you guys have a plan other than "shoot your biggest scum read so your confirmed townie" cause honestly how accurate are scum reads on day 1. (not very) and the last thing we need is townies offing townies during the day and scum offing townies during the night. | ||
|
FreelanceSatan
36 Posts
| ||
|
FreelanceSatan
36 Posts
| ||
|
FreelanceSatan
36 Posts
| ||
|
FreelanceSatan
36 Posts
Lemme go back | ||
|
FreelanceSatan
36 Posts
On June 12 2012 00:22 MrZentor wrote: Is anybody else bothered by this? There's no reason you should "veto" a decision because you can shoot. Regardless of the topic, it stunts discussion, which is really scummy. this was what i was reading. sorry i had thought it was chaoser for some reason.. i think it was gonzaw actually. lemme go re read his wall of text | ||
|
FreelanceSatan
36 Posts
You dont like when people support your reads?? | ||
|
FreelanceSatan
36 Posts
On June 12 2012 02:40 rastaban wrote: You guys do understand I was referring to shooting people claiming miller in later stages of the game future and not ones claiming now (which i was for). I just point this out since FreelanceSatan's quote below references wanting to shoot the claiming millers. What i was saying was ok that makes much more sense if your not talking about millers claiming now and trying to disrupt the plan. I still think you should try to avoid dealing with absolutes such as "if a miller claims later shoot him" we cant be 100% sure one way or the other so it would be best to take it on a case by case basis. But your right.. if a miller is claiming later into the game just to save his ass it should definitely be noted that it looks significantly worse than if he claimed now and we should act accordingly. | ||
|
FreelanceSatan
36 Posts
just saying. It might be a good idea to get me in the front of the "Tell this guy to shoot this guy line" and avoid the whole thing entirely if we can. I understand that this is probably my own fault for playing the way I do but i genuinely try as hard as I can to show my townieness when town and still often come up as scummy to everyone. Just putting that out there. | ||
|
FreelanceSatan
36 Posts
On June 12 2012 03:38 Toadesstern wrote: 2 quick questions: Is that an argument with 2 phrases that belongs together? I doubt it but I don't get why you're using "would" in the first place. So why "would" you fos chaoser for that instead of just fosing him? Sounds a little like "I would .... if not for ..." to me and that sounds a little like an excuse when there's no reason to make an excuse. You're a smurf so surely you know how to play. Why are you so insecure and tell us that you would FOS him instead of fosing him in the first place? That really sounds a little weak. If the argument is "I would fos him if I were a miller" I want to know why you see a reason to fos him as a miller but don't see a reason to fos him as a VT lol I wrote the "would " because I could not find the post where "choaser" said that. Turns out I couldnt find it cause it wasnt chaoser. That was why I didnt post "im putting a FOS on Chaoser" because I couldnt find it to back it up. and now we know why. because I had misread the names and gotten confused. | ||
|
FreelanceSatan
36 Posts
I was saying "anyway im not miller However.." and then posted the part below it as in "However I will volunteer to shoot" even tho im not miller and you guys are planning on making millers shoot. | ||
|
FreelanceSatan
36 Posts
| ||
|
FreelanceSatan
36 Posts
If so what do we do to pick his target? all vote? let him randomly choose? | ||
|
FreelanceSatan
36 Posts
On June 12 2012 04:37 chaoser wrote: Isn't it Night 0? As in mafia get to do night kills if they want to? why did RoL claim miller already... yeah i didnt even think about that..looks like he jumped the gun a bit there.. what are the chances the mafia would want to shoot him instead of shooting for blues tho? | ||
|
FreelanceSatan
36 Posts
| ||
|
FreelanceSatan
36 Posts
On June 12 2012 06:01 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: Can we agree right now to not go rogue and shoot without discussion? There needs to be some deliberation behind peoples shots. If everyone just goes rambo then we'll never actually get a chance to scumhunt. this.. if we dont holda public vote for each shot and require EVERYONE to vote we will lose a ton of information. I hope we can all conclude that shooting without votes first is incredibly anti town | ||
|
FreelanceSatan
36 Posts
On June 12 2012 06:08 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote: I'm going to shoot toad if I survive. I remember several other retarded things said as well. Any issue with that? It would probably be best to hold off on this discussion till after night dont give scum any info to create wifom and chaos with their shots tonight unless absolutely necessary. ( altho it looks like the damage is done at any rate) | ||
|
FreelanceSatan
36 Posts
On June 12 2012 11:19 marvellosity wrote: we need to kill gonzaw I just might be able to get down with that. | ||
|
FreelanceSatan
36 Posts
| ||
| ||
