|
Stofu and Ange 
Seriously, it isn't that hard to vote. Hell even Gambit managed to do it.
Hassy, what are your reasons for being so careful about Kita? You're never going to catch him saying "hey look here, I am an obvious scum". What do you mean by "all the rest"? As in he is the towniest here?
Quite jumping around and give us an answer, Kita = Scum/Town/Third party?
|
I think this is appropriate
[image blocked]
Now answer the question.
|
Thanks for posting Hassy.
Instead of selecting a couple of random quotes, can you provide your thoughts on my last case against Kita (klicky).
I can respond to your points if you wish but not surprisingly, I disagree.
|
On May 31 2012 15:13 MajuGarzett wrote: ##Vote:VisceraEyes
MZ's case contained some valid points and that breadcrumb makes absolutely no sense. A lynch of VE would also be much more informative than the lynch of gambit or zealos. Lynches on Kita and Hyaach are to me less well substantiated as well as unlikely to materialise.
Maju what is this? You hardly mentioned VE before this post and then suddenly he gets your vote? You don't even wholeheartedly agree with MZ's case rather it just has some valid points? You also give youself a nice excuse not to vote for either Zealos or Gambit. As far as a I can tell from your filter you thought VE was scum because MZ said so and you didn't understand why VE breadcrumbed the way he did. Then comes this post
On May 31 2012 15:41 MajuGarzett wrote:Show nested quote +On May 31 2012 15:33 VisceraEyes wrote: No one is SUPPOSED to glean that I'm a vigilante from it...crumbs are for determining targets posthumously....not for proving claims Maju. Show nested quote +On May 31 2012 15:34 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On May 31 2012 15:26 VisceraEyes wrote: What do you want to know about it? MZ knew exactly which post I was talking about. If he's town, and if I died overnight, I'm pretty sure he'd have said something about that very post considering how hot to trot I was about Zealos N1. It's not supposed to make sense to everyone Maju, it's only supposed to be picked up by very observant and by people knowing what they're looking for. That's what a breadcrumb is. No I wouldn't have said anything about zealos because it wasn't a breadcrumb. A breadcrumb is where you spell out who you're hitting or the name of your role using the first letters of each post or name your role in a certain manner or something clever like that (that's a tip kids write it down). That way there's no ambiguity when you say "hey guys I'm an ___ and I breadcrumbed here." What you did was post a little symbol which means nothing, allowing you to tell us how to interpret it however you need. I only knew which post you were gonna reference because with the amount of time I've spent reading your filter I knew there wasn't anything remotely close to a real breadcrumb. I and apparently MZ would disagree. I have to sleep now so perhaps you'll be able to prove your innocence by morning.
Which you never follow up on. In fact you don't even post before VE flips. You had no real reason to vote for VE whilst there was plenty said about Zealos or Gambit but you conveniently found a way to slip your vote in without making a stand. You don't even call VE mafia, rather his flip would provide more information? Well what information did you glean that you wouldn't have gleaned from an actual mafia flip of Zealos or Gambit?
I know some people have looked at Maju but the rest take a look and let me know what you think.
|
Welcome to the ET and Probulous show, brought to you by Townies R Us. For a limited time only see two posters try to move the thread ALL BY THEMSELVES. That's right folks, no outside help, no additional contributions, just two regular joes making a difference.
But be quick, this offer is for a limtied time only. If you post soon, not only will you get a special role in our production but for this night only, you will also get our undivided attention. If you are the lucky next poster, you will also receive a Shamwow, courtesy of Townies R Us.
Post soon, this is one time offer so don't miss out.
This offer is limited to Townies R Us. Shamwow is a sham and we do no endorse this product nor any of its affiliates. You will receive nothing but the gratitude of the thread participants. ET likes to wear pink dresses.
|
On June 04 2012 14:39 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On June 04 2012 14:28 MajuGarzett wrote:On June 04 2012 14:02 EchelonTee wrote: Maju: opinion on Marv and Manason pls. Lynch or no?
Gotta get those M's in place. Has there been a case made on Marv to look at by any chance? I don't think I saw one. I've felt pretty safe about him though. I'd not vote for his lynch unless I've missed some really obvious scum tell. Manason would be a good lynch I think. Marv's case on him was pretty sensible though I hope that Mana comes back to reply to it fully and also to present the promised case on Kita. I also found it strange that Mana never really commented on other cases on Kita and just went and said he'd construct his own case. It would make sense to do this if he had different reasons for suspecting Kita than others do but from what I can see he has only expressed agreement with the cases. He could be trying to avoid looking like he's blindly agreeing with people by saying he'll make his own case. answer one question: what's the single most important thing marvellosity did this game? *waves hand in the air*
"ooh ooh, pick me, pick me!!!"
|
You didn't pick me
|
Well MY answer would be that he has been right when he didn't have to be.
He was right about Zealos He was right about supersoft He was right about SnB He was right about VE
But I guess that is more than one thing. Oh and he proposed to me. I'm a sucker for a girl on her knees.
|
Ok I am about to head home so if I die before I get back to post here are my last wishes
We kill the Kitaman27.
Then we take a good look at Hassybaby, Maju and Manason as the next lynch targets.
|
On June 04 2012 19:49 marvellosity wrote: also stop flirting Prob, I don't wish to play mafia in a state of sexual arousal
|
There are enough targets around. Thankfully there are a more players putting in the effort than there are shots available so all will not be lost tomorrow.
If you do die warty one, we will avenge you by killing the Kitaman. If I die, do me the same.
4 VE
|
"If I die before I wake At least in heaven I can sk8 Cause right now on earth I can't do shit Without Kit-a-man fuck-in with it"
|
Yeah that is my question too.
WBG been shot twice and he isn't protected the third time?
|
##Vote: Kitaman27
For VE, Bugs, Jaj, BH, supersoft and for mattchew.
DIE Bastard DIE!
Sorry, Kita I wouldn't normally say that but Toad made me do it.
|
On June 05 2012 08:05 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On June 05 2012 08:02 Probulous wrote: Yeah that is my question too.
WBG been shot twice and he isn't protected the third time? Bugs was shot three times? Did I miss something? I only recall the day one claimed shot and today's shot.
Bugs claimed two shots. Night 1 and 2.
|
On June 05 2012 08:07 Probulous wrote:Show nested quote +On June 05 2012 08:05 kitaman27 wrote:On June 05 2012 08:02 Probulous wrote: Yeah that is my question too.
WBG been shot twice and he isn't protected the third time? Bugs was shot three times? Did I miss something? I only recall the day one claimed shot and today's shot. Bugs claimed two shots. Night 1 and 2.
Woops he claimed roleblock not shot, my bad
|
On June 05 2012 08:14 Toadesstern wrote:there: Show nested quote +four mafia left, possibly some third party but that's doubtful to me.
These people need to die immediately:
kita maju papanda manason
any of them flip town and we need to kill Austin and Hassy as well, potentially. I lean town on them both for now given that the named four above look much worse. I'm leaning on austin being town as well and would rather put someone else on spot 6 but I'm just quoting bugs
I'm with ET on this one. Seems a little lobsided to have a scum team with only Kita as a leader. The others are all newbs and against a town that has
MZ WBG supersoft Forumite BH VE (when he is on form) Wiggles
Seems a little one-sided. Best to keep eyes open for scum leaders. I agree wholeheartedly with Maju. Manason is a possibility.
WBG's case on Papanda seems to based off of this
On June 04 2012 13:13 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On June 04 2012 12:57 papapanda wrote: Kenpachi, reading through your filter again I saw that you fos me. Can you post some things I can try to defend against if you still find me scummy? I'll be out the rest of tonight, but I will respond as soon as I can. based on this post I'm going to assume you are scum and that kenpachi is town. Thanks for making it that easy.
Did he say anything else?
|
OK austin, what are your thoughts on Hyaach and papapanda?
It would be most excellent if you could include a quote or two to explain why you think they are the alignment you think they are. That made sense in my head.
|
I think papapanda is scummy and was just easing things away from Zealos, he was always easing them towards Hyaach without too much reasoning (To be fair, I thought Hyaach's no-vote thought and eventual vote were bad plays, but not scummy). Hmm that is what I am grappling with.
Papapanda did defend Zealos by pushing Hyaach over him, but he FOS'd Hyaach very early. I had similar suspicions about Hyaach so I can understand where he was coming from. Zealos was, and always was, a lurker, so choosing someone you have a scum read on over a lurker is not terrible. Unfortunately for Papapanda Zealos flipped scum and now he looks like he was trying to avoid voting for him.
However I agree with WBG's point about this
On June 04 2012 13:13 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On June 04 2012 12:57 papapanda wrote: Kenpachi, reading through your filter again I saw that you fos me. Can you post some things I can try to defend against if you still find me scummy? I'll be out the rest of tonight, but I will respond as soon as I can. based on this post I'm going to assume you are scum and that kenpachi is town. Thanks for making it that easy. He avoids everyone else, doesn't bother to find the case, doesn't respond to any other case and doesn't bother pushing his own scum reads. Oh and he responds to Kenpachi who is another lurker instead of the others who are actually participating in the thread. It just rings scum, scum, scum.
Anyone else have an idea about the panda man? People seem to have him labelled as mafia so it would be nice to have something fleshy to look at. Does one post a case make?
|
On June 05 2012 10:57 Kenpachi wrote: we finally doing this? good. ROFL, well we did lynch scum yesterday so no harm done right?
Ken, since you're here. Aside from Kita, I assume you still want to lynch papapanda?
On May 30 2012 10:43 Kenpachi wrote: ##vote papapanda intuition tells me hes mafia
On June 01 2012 10:31 Kenpachi wrote: ...if ihad a gun, id shoot papapanda. i know hes mafia. i just know it
Anything to add to this? We don't all have your godly intuition.
|
|
|
|