|
Blazinghand
United States25563 Posts
On May 30 2012 14:23 sToFu wrote:
2. Why are we lynching gambit when the lynch provides little to no information. The same logic that applies to gambit largely applies to the other lurkers of this game - including me. Why gambit in particular, and what's the point of lynching a lurker when we are not only unsure if he's just inactive/bad or scum? Bugs seems to be avoiding the question.
G32is scummy. He's lurking. He's actively voting so he doesn't get modkilled. His posts are wishy-washy and scummy, all 2 of them. I'm certain he is scum. I don't care about information or whatever, I want to lynch scum. If he is indeed scum, we'll still have a wagon and counter-wagon analysis to do after he flips, since right now, scum know whether or not he's scum. Lurking does NOT absolve you of guilt. It never will in my eyes, and I would gladly lynch a thousand G32s and Purgatory Erandorrs and Student BBytes until they all fall to the ground like a thousand burned snowflakes
On May 30 2012 14:23 sToFu wrote:
3. Where's Wiggles? Did he post saying he would be gone? I don't recall seeing a post of his for a very long time.
I think Wiggles is German so he's probably asleep.
|
Blazinghand
United States25563 Posts
On May 30 2012 14:26 sToFu wrote:
I would tend to side w/ SnB on the issue of Mattchew. His "let me lie to town and spring a trap" strategy seems inherently flawed, and I do think that SnB's reasoning was solid in that Mattchew would be more likely to be a vig hit than a mafia hit, especially given some of the accusations pressed against him D1.
they could both be scum
|
Blazinghand
United States25563 Posts
Technically it has decreased since the game start due to the foru flip
|
Blazinghand
United States25563 Posts
austin think about how toad would know of / who is the other mason? He must have found his crumbs.
|
Blazinghand
United States25563 Posts
Which is to say tha WE could find said crumbs if we look
|
Blazinghand
United States25563 Posts
do i count as a vet? Kp says so
|
Blazinghand
United States25563 Posts
|
Blazinghand
United States25563 Posts
On May 31 2012 03:23 austinmcc wrote:
We have never received a guarantee that masons are all town, the end (yes? Someone correct me quick if I'm horribly wrong). What we HAVE been told is that "variations" are possible, and a scum or third-party mason certainly sounds to me like a variation on mason.
On May 10 2012 01:40 GreYMisT wrote:
Mason
May communicate with another player in the game via PM
^-- green
I'm pretty sure that a variation to be scum would mean in the list of scum roles there would be a red one.
|
Blazinghand
United States25563 Posts
It's because he called the role "mason recruiter" rather than mason?
|
Blazinghand
United States25563 Posts
If G32 is mason, when he comes back to the thread he'll just claim whoever he masoned last night. But w/e he's scum
|
Blazinghand
United States25563 Posts
|
Blazinghand
United States25563 Posts
SnB do you really think that in a normal game, there is a SECOND third party guy, AND he's a mason?
|
Blazinghand
United States25563 Posts
like, how is that somehow more likely than "MZ and Toad are both lying scum"
|
Blazinghand
United States25563 Posts
On May 31 2012 04:27 strongandbig wrote:
BH, I've already said a bunch of times I think toad is lying. People keep calling me scummy for saying that.
But, IF there are *two different masons* with different powers, as Toad claims there are, I see no reason why they would both have to be town.
role list
role list
role list
|
Blazinghand
United States25563 Posts
VE so you were roleblocked, does that mean you still have your bullet?
|
Blazinghand
United States25563 Posts
This is your crumb?
On May 30 2012 03:59 VisceraEyes wrote:
¿Kita what do you think of Zealos sir?
How is it distinct from a post like this?
On May 30 2012 04:23 VisceraEyes wrote:
BH what are your thoughts on the super thing?
Or this?
On May 30 2012 03:25 VisceraEyes wrote:
Is that because he drew no conclusion Mz? I didn't mind the post aside from the fact that he doesn't say whether or not he thinks you're scum.
|
Blazinghand
United States25563 Posts
|
Blazinghand
United States25563 Posts
|
Blazinghand
United States25563 Posts
I think it's supposed to be this one.
On May 31 2012 14:50 Blazinghand wrote:This is your crumb? Show nested quote +On May 30 2012 03:59 VisceraEyes wrote:
¿Kita what do you think of Zealos sir?
|
Blazinghand
United States25563 Posts
On May 31 2012 14:59 MajuGarzett wrote:Show nested quote +On May 31 2012 14:58 Blazinghand wrote:I think it's supposed to be this one. On May 31 2012 14:50 Blazinghand wrote:This is your crumb? On May 30 2012 03:59 VisceraEyes wrote:
¿Kita what do you think of Zealos sir? Can someon explain how this was supposed to be a breadcrumb?
It's not, VE is scum.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
