| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On May 30 2012 05:27 Forumite wrote: EBWOP: I´m fine with you NOT calling it, if your target dies then it doesn´t matter if you call it or not. I'd feel much more comfortable if you announced it before the night hits were revealed. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On May 28 2012 15:20 VisceraEyes wrote: I mean, I spelled it out myself. Okay, so I like Kita/Sinensis for scum so far...which is actually kinda disturbing, what do you think about 2 scum pretty much just claiming in thread like that? The confidence coming from this post is not townlike. At this point, the only policies I have pushed is electing a candidate who hasn't announced their intentions for running for mayor and to elect Toad as pardoner. Sinensis has only pushed a policy lynch, which may have been a poor idea, but wasn't inherantly scummy. In response, makes a blanket statement about us claiming scum. Throughout the thread, VE has been asking players their opinion of other players, but has yet to produce a valid case against a player. He announces that I would be his prefered lynch, yet refuses to push it due to lack of support. If he was willing to push me yesterday, why back off today? You don't ignore your primary scum suspect because everyone else thinks he is town, you convince them with a compelling case. I was attacked primarily for my support of Toad, yet now that Toad has been confirmed as a mason, his opinion of me has not changed? Hopefully more to come in a bit. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On May 30 2012 13:35 wherebugsgo wrote: also I have completed reading the thread. I have some other sneaking suspicions but I won't let them go for now, because there is far too much on the table already. There's no need to try and out the entire scumteam right now when we can only kill one of them and not 6. You can't sub into a game and then refuse to share your reads. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On May 30 2012 13:55 Probulous wrote: Given that Kita has gone after you it would be great if you could summarise your case against him. His play to me is double-sided. I can't understand the motivation behind the Lyncher thing but everything else he has done looks townie. Hmm, you don't understand why I wouldn't want a lyncher elected? On May 30 2012 14:06 Probulous wrote: I noticed this too Kita but how does it make him scum? The role is pretty damn useless as scum would be sacrificing one of their own if they used it. Toad however is difficult to read and is not beyond doing things that look incredibly scummy. I can understand a certain trepidation in putting him into office. It is not like VE was advocating putting scum into the role. As you say Toad could be confirmed the next day and so it would make sense to use that as leverage to ensure scum don't get the role but it seems VE just wasn't comfortable with Toad being in a position of power. Why is that scum motivated and not a paranoid townie? The role isn't useless as scum because a strong player can argue for the use of a pardon and the role kills us at lylo. As far as I can see, there was nothing to be paranoid about. Toad put himself in a situation where his word could be trusted and he gave his word that he wouldn't use the pardoner role. A paranoid townie is the one who doesn't pass on the opportunity to elect toad into office, because the other candidates may be scum. On May 30 2012 13:49 wherebugsgo wrote: this is funny, kita. I shared 3 of my reads. I'm not about to share my town reads (that aren't meapak) nor the rest of my reads. Though, I suppose if you're attacking me right now it means you've caught onto something. Good for you, it's nice to know scum are scared of me. I just saw your post, wondering why you dedicate a post to telling us that you had suspicions, but weren't going to share them, without fully catching up on the thread. My appologies. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
Hassybaby has not shared his opinion on a single player this game. I'd like to request a large post from him within the next 24 hours or he should be strongly considered as a vig target tommorrow night. Zealos has disappeared. As a lynch candidate, he needs to be extremely active today if he hopes to stay out of trouble. marvellosity's filter is far too safe for my liking. GambitX32's two posts look as if he knew he would be expected to share his opinion, but had nothing to say, so he just made a few generic statements about a bunch of players. I don't see anything of value that his post adds to the thread. I'm unwilling to trust Wiggles, but I'm unable to put together anything close to a valid case against him. With myself and Meapak being town, it doesn't bode well for him for him from a balance perspective, although VE could also serve as the scum leader. S&B and Manason are still sketchy. I want a more developed case from each of them that adds something to the thread. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On May 30 2012 14:43 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: Today we should be lynching kitaman, I'll write a nice little something up in a bit as to why. Or you could save your time and focus your efforts elsewhere. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On May 30 2012 14:59 Probulous wrote: What does this mean? Are they scum or dumb town? They are both players that I see as more scummy than towny. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On May 31 2012 01:14 marvellosity wrote: Your point is "balance lol" I'm not lynching on that. I'm convinced. ![[image loading]](http://hollywoodhatesme.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/hypnotoad.jpg) | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On May 31 2012 01:10 Toadesstern wrote: anyways, I need several people to get in here before starting to explain stuff so I'm a little afk (I could tell you what I'm doing but some weird guy would probably come out of nowhere telling me that's some weird breadcrumb) BREADCRUMB?! Are you claiming Professor Membrane, the creator of supertoast?! ![[image loading]](http://cdn.buzznet.com/assets/users16/foolishxearthxcreature/default/professor-membrane-toast--large-msg-119759279368.jpg) | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
 | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On May 31 2012 01:38 VisceraEyes wrote: Kita are you town? I mean, obviously I have doubts...but I was unable to make a cohesive case against you last night when I tried. I think you're playing a pretty manipulative game, but not necessarily scummy after trying to build a case. I'm willing to work with you if you're town. I wanted to work together VE! I really did! But then you shunned logic and focused on your nonsense manipulation arguement to the point where you could no longer be included in our order! Don't blame us for your failings VE. I counted 17 instances in your filter where you found me suspicious, wanted me lynched, or suggested that I should be shot. My policy has not changed. The only change is that I have written a case against you and Meapak no longer suspects me. So tell me, what has changed that made you go from the point of stating that I "claimed scum in the thread" to being town. You say you cannot build a case against me, but that did not stop you from pushing for my death the previous cycle. What gives? Furthermore, why were you unwilling to push a case on me without Meapak's support? If I was truly your number one suspect, why does he have to push the lynch on me, rather than yourself? | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On May 31 2012 02:06 VisceraEyes wrote: Because like you I need vet support to ly.ch a vet. Nothing strange about that. No, from your first post you've made it clear that I'm not welcome in your order. Even now you speak in the past tense...indicating that even if it wear possible, the time is passed. It doesn't matter now. You don't want me to work with you even though by your estimation I'm skilled enough to "lead the scumteam"...which I find maddening. I hope your.conviction is as strong as your.suspicion. I'm town and I won't be just LETTING you lynch me. You didn't address my main concerns On May 31 2012 01:51 kitaman27 wrote: I counted 17 instances in your filter where you found me suspicious, wanted me lynched, or suggested that I should be shot. My policy has not changed. The only change is that I have written a case against you and Meapak no longer suspects me. So tell me, what has changed that made you go from the point of stating that I "claimed scum in the thread" to being town. You say you cannot build a case against me, but that did not stop you from pushing for my death the previous cycle. What gives? | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
DON'T THINK YOU CAN HIDE FROM US. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On May 30 2012 14:31 Mr. Wiggles wrote: Right now I'm trying to determine who I think is scummiest/want to lynch from kitaman/supersoft/zealos/gambit. How did you come to decide it should be gambit from that list? | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
Wiggles? | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On May 31 2012 09:46 VisceraEyes wrote: Something to note Probulous is the fact that Kitaman promised to take a closer look at Hyaach specifically BECAUSE he chose him as his random candidate. I wonder what the fruits of those observations has been. ##Unvote: Zealos ##Vote: Hyaach lol now you're just making stuff up -_- | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games |
|
Kung Fu Cup
The PondCast
Online Event
Korean StarCraft League
Afreeca Starleague
Rush vs Soulkey
CranKy Ducklings
BSL Open Qualifier
Sparkling Tuna Cup
IPSL
BSL Open Qualifier
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
