Bastard Mafia

On April 09 2012 08:23 layabout wrote:
/confirm
please vig bluelightz

On April 10 2012 20:28 Drazerk wrote:
Assuming the game is balanced is a really really bad idea

On April 10 2012 21:24 Jackal58 wrote:
Has this game started?
I mean like officially.

On April 11 2012 00:38 GreYMisT wrote:
The day ends today, and so far we have 3 votes on 3 different people. I believe my vote makes the most sense at the moment given the information we have assuming nothing.

On April 10 2012 22:24 Sbrubbles wrote:


How about repeating the joke about killing you twice after the PMs were sent out then later claiming his job is to do the opposite? Sounds like he just made it up, based on his "kill bluelightz" shenanigans, just to add it to his massclaim argument.

On April 11 2012 00:29 Macheji wrote:
Ok i'll just say that layabout had made atleast 3 posts about killing bluelightz ( one of the reasons was "for the lols" ). Now he claims he needs him alive.... i mean , a mistake is a mistake, but making 3 posts about killing him and giving 4+ reasons ( all unrelated to this game ) for this and then turning 180' is weird. He also wanted to kill shrubbles.
I would propose that if we are to lynch somebody, until this moment, he seems like the best choice. But i am keeping an open mind until the time to vote does come.

On April 11 2012 00:55 GreYMisT wrote:
Sop you condemn Macheji for "sheeping other people's reasons about layabout" and yet you list only other peoples reasons.

Interesting.

On April 11 2012 19:18 Macheji wrote:
@ Cyber_Cheese . This is the first time i play this game, just tought i have to make a defence after bluelightz "attacked" me. Maybe cuz of excitement, to talk , interact or something. But the first one was really legit, right after he accused me. The second one was because i used some arguments somebody else used before me ( so that my new added details can be understood easier ) and i felt like bluelightz will have another go at me. I just wanted to make my intentions clear. If argumenting my posts and actions when someone accuses me on various reasons is "suspect", and "incriminating" then i don't really know how to act in such a situation . Hmm, it's weird cuz i'm defending myself right now, tought proving innocence would be easier ... between a rock and a hard place huh...

On April 11 2012 05:40 Macheji wrote:
Oh and before bluelightz starts accusing me of sheeping or whatever it's called again. I know i used Drazerk's point. I added some details so other people don't have to start checking all the forums for the times. I also said it to show you guys what determined me to cast my vote and to reply to layabout's

On April 11 2012 20:49 VisceraEyes wrote:
Yeah, I'm good with a Cyber_Cheese lynch. Playing the newbie card is one thing, but not as a sole basis for a lynch. I think Macheji responded fine to C_C's accusation, and the fact that C_C is still pushing it is coming off as scummy to me.

##Vote: Cyber_Cheese

On April 10 2012 14:48 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
Hey, strongandbig, why are you obsessed with the sleeper cell agents?
Furthermore, why would you try using code, when you have the anonymous message at your disposal?

On April 12 2012 21:12 Cyber_Cheese wrote:

Another completely useless post. Who? Why?

[spoiler=Me]

I should have thought to rebut this sooner. I just dismissed it as stupid at the time.

Pushed too far on Macheji? Exactly how did I do that? When is too far? If you find someone looking like complete scum, do you just let the rest of town completely ignore them?

I ask two questions aimed at getting strongandbig to post stuff relevant to the current game, how does that make me a better lynch candidate than the person you had been pursuing all game?

Furthermore, he's just suddenly town now?
This is his filter
What exactly makes him seem like a townie to you? To date, he's thrown down a sheep vote, and essentially spent all his attention of defending himself instead of scum hunting, even when called out on it.

Scum buddies? I think so!

On April 13 2012 00:58 GreYMisT wrote:


How can you say you are not suspicious of him when you voted him? You also say that some people rage when attacked, but then you also say he defended himself well. is this "rage" a good enough defense to satisfy you?

On April 10 2012 07:28 VisceraEyes wrote:
I think we should lynch layabout.

I mean...layabout.

Am I doing it right?

On April 11 2012 20:49 VisceraEyes wrote:
Yeah, I'm good with a Cyber_Cheese lynch. Playing the newbie card is one thing, but not as a sole basis for a lynch. I think Macheji responded fine to C_C's accusation, and the fact that C_C is still pushing it is coming off as scummy to me.

##Vote: Cyber_Cheese

On April 17 2012 04:08 johnnywup wrote:
BL, does macheji HAVE to be dead for you to win with your other wincons?

On April 17 2012 23:59 Sbrubbles wrote:


So, you're putting your vote on E3, despite your claimed win condition and with still with plenty of time to discuss and try to change the focus from him to someone else? I wasn't 100% sure before, but now I'm certain you're the SK.

Guys, Bluelightz needs to die. I don't care about E3 and have no problem with him getting lynched along with Blue, but we can't let Blue live to kill again tonight.

On April 17 2012 23:59 Sbrubbles wrote:


So, you're putting your vote on E3, despite your claimed win condition and with still with plenty of time to discuss and try to change the focus from him to someone else? I wasn't 100% sure before, but now I'm certain you're the SK.

Guys, Bluelightz needs to die. I don't care about E3 and have no problem with him getting lynched along with Blue, but we can't let Blue live to kill again tonight.

On April 18 2012 00:10 Sbrubbles wrote:


You claim E3 is one of the people you're trying to keep alive, but you place your vote on him with still plenty of daytime for discussion. Why? Because you're lying about your win condition.