On April 05 2012 06:34 Nova_Terra wrote:
As i feel like i need to be doing something, i just want to note why the reasons to flop around are also not good.
Starting withh imallinson.
first part: why should anyone other than lyter have defended himself? what? If i make a case against somebody and he defends it, does that mean i am more likely scum because i didnt defend something?
second part: Lazin clarified that (multiple times) reasonably well. if Lyter is blue and was about to be lynched, it is sufficient a reason to claim blue so town at least doesnt totally waste a lynch (and probably out a blue, as i dont think a mafia would try to claim blue day 1 when someone could just counterclaim him)
As i feel like i need to be doing something, i just want to note why the reasons to flop around are also not good.
Starting withh imallinson.
first part: why should anyone other than lyter have defended himself? what? If i make a case against somebody and he defends it, does that mean i am more likely scum because i didnt defend something?
second part: Lazin clarified that (multiple times) reasonably well. if Lyter is blue and was about to be lynched, it is sufficient a reason to claim blue so town at least doesnt totally waste a lynch (and probably out a blue, as i dont think a mafia would try to claim blue day 1 when someone could just counterclaim him)
My point is there is one more scum out there assuming Lyter is scum then they would be risking losing half their number if they don't defend him. It certainly doesn't remove all suspicion from him but enough for me think he is a bad lynch today. As for Lazin I have been reasonably convinced of his motives the only reason I haven't changed my vote is I haven't been convinced as to anyone else's scummyness.