| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
also this On March 22 2012 20:15 Bluelightz wrote: Oh, I'd love if the deadline was 5 kst ^^ Edit for below: 8 KST would be a good alternative. I'm usually awake till the former on my days off, and finish work slightly before the latter. | ||
|
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/P7KtZ.jpg) Alright boys, lets do this. On March 27 2012 07:17 VisceraEyes wrote: ATTENTION SCUM! IT WILL BE IN YOUR BEST INTEREST TO PUT ME ON THE BACK FOOT IMMEDIATELY! IF YOU ATTEMPT TO HIDE I WILL FIND YOU! Something about this seems suss. Compensating for some sort of guilt perhaps? | ||
|
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On March 27 2012 07:43 VisceraEyes wrote: Perhaps. Perhaps not. I noticed that you didn't give an opinion one way or the other C_C, is there a reason you don't want to commit to a stance? As town, it's hard to stay with a solid stance. Games change, and ultimately these little things never seem to come up anyway. As mafia, having a solid stance and sticking with it is basically a free pass. Ultimately, 'lurking' and 'lying' are only a fraction of a persons play. However, if it's a stance you want: In my experience, the moment you bother lynching the lurkers is the moment you know mafia are in control of the game, especially if it's done sooner. If we can conclusively prove someone was lying, that person should be suspect in the first place, and automatically be rated higher than lurkers. | ||
|
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On March 27 2012 07:43 EchelonTee wrote: Hi CC ! At school bbl Policy lynch is teh sux Howdy :D On March 27 2012 07:44 johnnywup wrote: like you would make a stance 2 posts in a game, VE? 1) Why are you defending me? Buddy up much? 2) if you're going to make a stance, do it sooner rather than later. | ||
|
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On March 27 2012 13:04 Blazinghand wrote: Maybe he's just a town player who didn't think things through carefully and worded his posts ambiguously (in an attack that is fundamentally about wording posts). 'If he's town' is good for setting up a safe escape when a mafia lead lynch goes badly, but townies shouldn't need an escape. This is a slippery slope that scum love. Lets try to lynch scum, and settle for nothing less k? On March 27 2012 10:13 Nemesis wrote: Do you mind posting something coherent? This is a rather crappy post. Town SHOULD always take a stance. If your stance change throughout the game, then you just have to explain why it changed. Scum are the only one who should fear taking stances, as they can get caught when their explanation doesn't match with their stance. Ideally, yes. In practice, this kills town atmosphere because everyone is afraid to post. Example: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=296791 | ||
|
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
Why did I post it? I was going to post it regardless of pm. As for my stances ##Vote Bluelightz | ||
|
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On March 28 2012 03:47 Cyber_Cheese wrote: I seem to be getting a lot of flak for that soviet flag. Why did I post it? I was going to post it regardless of pm. As for my stances ##Vote Bluelightz Preparing a decent explaination of my stance on him and a couple of others now, just throwing it out there in advance to give you more time to discuss | ||
|
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On March 27 2012 09:33 Bluelightz wrote: Err, I'm here guys like everyone else, I don't like policy lynches. Busting out some early reads,VE is town because he has been active and pushing discussion :D Put simply, why should he feel the need to state he's like everyone else? On March 27 2012 18:32 Bluelightz wrote: Reads, Reads! Blazinghand ---> Catapaulted to very sure is townie from his recent posting(Active, Pressuring people, etc) and being funny and awesome in starcraft ^_^ Some random summaries MrZentor --> Has been following Discussion, has not provided any reads, I'd love some reads from him. gonzaw --> Has followed discussion, setup speculation, I'd love some reads and more content from him . ET --> Townie, has followed discussion pressed people to post, preety townie C_C ---> Needs to step up, he has nothing of substance, has not taken a stance on anything yet, I want reads, willing to lynch depending on what he post's next. Pointing out townies and asking for discussion isn't as helpful as it seems. On March 27 2012 15:12 Bluelightz wrote: I agree with your points Sinensis, He didnt explain his votes in any way, espescially the one on Nemesis, Johhnys points are also sound, I will also be watching him for anything. Blatant buddying. He also shouldn't need to state that he's watching for suspicious posts, because townies should be doing it anyway. On March 27 2012 21:55 Bluelightz wrote: IMO, froggy dont be a new Jackal58 XD, Hmm, so who would be more worrying? A TOTALLY Inactive person or a person that has posted. On March 27 2012 22:27 Bluelightz wrote: His response: You haven't asked or directed anything towards me so what am I supposed to say? It's only the first day, no need to get accusatory. While Blazinghand is being aggressive and a little narcissistic, it's just to stimulate conversation, I don't think he's scum. Me: wtf? I push targets I feel scummy and you are one, Day One is same like any other day but the fact that we have no info to go bye, You still seem scummy because you have no substance, NOTHING. Well theres my response Zelblade(Random question but If I could shorten your name how could I do it?) And, what's your opinion on this as well? Does anything about that post suggest he's pushing scum to anyone? Combine those with the fact he's already getting called pro-town by a bunch of people. Conclusion: Scum. Also of particular interest to me are Gonzaw and Johnnywup. | ||
|
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On March 28 2012 04:27 VisceraEyes wrote: My responses to your bluelightz case are bolded. You're going to be lynched today, if you're town you'd better come up with some better reasoning than this if you expect to save yourself. I expected more C_C. I am dissapoint. Awww, you felt like you had to defend him. Cute | ||
|
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On March 28 2012 06:53 slOosh wrote: I'm taking back this question, it makes sense after catching up. Did a rough read of the thread so far - I don't see anything too conclusive from the BH talks. As for C_C, still waiting for him to post something. I've looked at gonzaw and I do agree with this post from VE,. (From what I understand) He thinks Bluelightz is scum but he hasn't actually posted a case on him. Gonzaw could you just post the case on him instead of asking people to look at him? I didn't say that the current candidates weren't good / bad - I just wanted more discussion / information to make better decisions. I think we should consolidate upon the pool of candidates so that we can focus discussion, so I'm evaluating the current candidates instead of bringing up more. By night time (when I can post in detail) I hope both C_C and gonzaw will have put up more stuff to work with. Like it or not, I think Bluelightz is scum for the reasons provided. What do people think of this guy? http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=322686&user=45996 Note the extreme neutrality and the fixation on his useless question Also this: On March 27 2012 14:55 Sinensis wrote: While I'm at it, here is what I think of johnnywup: I think he is ballsy to go after BlazingHand because BlazingHand is seemingly going after anyone who will pay him any attention. I don't think a mafia player would go after BlazingHand, because doing so risks being in the spotlight; BlazingHand being a very aggressive player at the moment. | ||
|
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On March 28 2012 08:00 VisceraEyes wrote: johnny, I know you're not beyond reason. Allow me to share this with you: C_C's Filter from L Just peruse the first few pages and then come back in here and say that again with a straight face. He doesn't give a shit about finding scum in this game, and is only posting enough to alleviate suspicion (see: yourself). He's being intentionally thick in regards to his case (unwilling to even comment on my rebuttal) and he's being intentionally vague about his reasoning behind posting the flag he posted in his first post. Look again johnny: I think you've got a good thing goin there with ET, but we can only lynch one at a time and presently C_C has the most support. What's this? Fear tactics half way into day 1? Shutting down other potential candidates? | ||
|
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On March 28 2012 08:38 VisceraEyes wrote: This was my initial case, which was strong enough as it was. Indications from C_C's first two posts:
Ever since then, he's only strengthened my case: go look at his case on Bluelightz, it's laughably bad. I responded to every point and all he had to say to that was "Awww, he's defending him". He's not interested in finding scum with us, and he's doing a piss-poor job of pretending to be interested in helping us. Yeah? | ||
|
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
##Vote Johnnywup Blatently defending me to that extent. Not many townies would have logically done it, but scum will know I flip town and end up looking good afterwards. He's my best read. | ||
|
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
+ Show Spoiler [gg] + ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/WcKq7.png) | ||
|
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On March 28 2012 11:28 johnnywup wrote: why would you include nationality in the c_c? I had the nationality to begin with, before my first post. It's irrelevant anyway, your whole team is already pegged. | ||
|
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On March 28 2012 11:56 Sinensis wrote: It is the combination of the flag and the graphic, and the fact that he is segregating names in his graphic based on nationality. I did what now? | ||
|
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On March 28 2012 11:59 VisceraEyes wrote: He's nationality-fishing BH, what don't you understand about that? He's trying to trick people into giving away what nationality they are. This helps scum and does not help town in the slightest...he's caught scum and he's trolling the fuck out of everyone. Since the beginning, I already had the graphic and my name in place, and was cbf change it more than I had to. Tell me, why would any sane townie correct which side of the same zone they belong in? As such, how is it 'helping scum'? Furthermore, some heroic soviet scientist has already solved the game, stop trying to kill him. | ||
|
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On March 28 2012 12:12 Sinensis wrote: C_C, the "soviet scientist's," posts would have me beg to differ. That was flavour only. | ||
|
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
+ Show Spoiler [previous post on him] + On March 28 2012 07:24 Cyber_Cheese wrote: [quote=O/T, someone asked]Im fine with being called C_C, Cyber, Cheese, CC, whatever. As long as I can tell you meant me, anything is fine. (Including curses) On March 28 2012 06:53 slOosh wrote: I'm taking back this question, it makes sense after catching up. Did a rough read of the thread so far - I don't see anything too conclusive from the BH talks. As for C_C, still waiting for him to post something. I've looked at gonzaw and I do agree with this post from VE,. (From what I understand) He thinks Bluelightz is scum but he hasn't actually posted a case on him. Gonzaw could you just post the case on him instead of asking people to look at him? I didn't say that the current candidates weren't good / bad - I just wanted more discussion / information to make better decisions. I think we should consolidate upon the pool of candidates so that we can focus discussion, so I'm evaluating the current candidates instead of bringing up more. By night time (when I can post in detail) I hope both C_C and gonzaw will have put up more stuff to work with. Like it or not, I think Bluelightz is scum for the reasons provided. What do people think of this guy? http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=322686&user=45996 Note the extreme neutrality and the fixation on his useless question Also this: On March 27 2012 14:55 Sinensis wrote: While I'm at it, here is what I think of johnnywup: I think he is ballsy to go after BlazingHand because BlazingHand is seemingly going after anyone who will pay him any attention. I don't think a mafia player would go after BlazingHand, because doing so risks being in the spotlight; BlazingHand being a very aggressive player at the moment. Notice how since then, he's only really chosen to talk one liners about me? | ||
|
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On March 28 2012 12:40 VisceraEyes wrote: Cyber_Cheese, gonzaw, EchelonTee, Blazinghand GG scum. If your name is on this list and you're town, you need to be doing something different. When C_C flips scum, we're just LYNCHIN DOWN THE LIIIIIIINE unless something changes. BH is last because of anyone he's putting in the most effort. I reward effort with asylum...but my patience only goes so far. ET and me, on the same scum team? In fact, ET at all? BH? | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games |
|
The PondCast
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
WardiTV European League
Jumy vs NightPhoenix
Percival vs Nicoract
ArT vs HiGhDrA
MaxPax vs Harstem
Scarlett vs Shameless
SKillous vs uThermal
Replay Cast
RSL Revival
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs Reynor
OSC
Replay Cast
RSL Revival
Classic vs Cure
FEL
OSC
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
