Sorry mate I presumed that you would either be scum, third party or have an item all of which was pro bonus for me... if you was town oh well I would of took the heat for it but still would of claimed it

Drazerk

United Kingdom31255 Posts

March 16 2012 23:33 GMT

#256

On March 17 2012 08:30 Blazinghand wrote:

Show nested quote +

Why in particular did you think this about VE? Why not someone else?

Looked at the player list and picked who I thought was the strongest player that was all it was

Drazerk

United Kingdom31255 Posts

March 16 2012 23:42 GMT

#265

On March 17 2012 08:39 Jayjay54 wrote:

Show nested quote +

yea, we already KNOW that VE is a sleeper cell shadowsinger. I don't think is being tested here

but draz claims the kill, so his kill flavour is Consumed by Shadow and Flame

Its the name of the ability so yes it is

Drazerk

United Kingdom31255 Posts

March 17 2012 00:06 GMT

#280

DO NOT VOTE FOR ME

Drazerk

United Kingdom31255 Posts

March 17 2012 00:22 GMT

#291

Kill wasn't compulsive
It is usable at any time with some major limitations
It's name is Shadows and Flames
I need items and that is all I am telling you about my role

I did it for three main reasons -

A) take out someone who I thought would be too dangerous if they was scum / third party ( there was a few on this list but it came down to past experiences )

B) Prevents stupid fluff posts at the start of the game and causes discussion which in turn allows us to scum hunt efficiently

C) I really wanted to use the ability before they got to do anything

Drazerk

United Kingdom31255 Posts

March 17 2012 00:31 GMT

#294

On March 17 2012 09:29 Jayjay54 wrote:
I also want to point out the possibility of wheatley betraying us later on.

For anyone who hasn't played portal 2: He gets the successor of Glados and basically gets insane and stuff.

He will be a cute robot now, but I gotta feeling he won't stay that way.

I presumed the same which means who ever has it will be taking a huge risk in having the item but at the same time we don't want scum to have it meaning we need to give it to someone who won't be that important but who we believe to be town.

Drazerk

United Kingdom31255 Posts

March 17 2012 00:41 GMT

#300

On March 17 2012 09:39 Bluelightz wrote:
Adding to the discussion Should the person that gets elected should claim the power or not? I think that he should claim the powers if its anti-town but im open to other opinions :D.

They should claim the power instantly.

Only issue is who ever gets it has a lot of time to prepare a fake ability so really it serves no purpose but to bend them to our knees and force them to do what we tell them to do as a collective town

Drazerk

United Kingdom31255 Posts

March 17 2012 00:44 GMT

#301

Also I just asked - He is a role not an item so for anyone who specifically needs items to use abilities it won't help you in the slightest so please bear this in mind if you try going for the election.

Drazerk

United Kingdom31255 Posts

March 17 2012 00:46 GMT

#303

Or they lie... like I presume most people would do

Drazerk

United Kingdom31255 Posts

March 17 2012 00:50 GMT

#307

Do we have to give someone Wheatley or can we just no vote?

Drazerk

United Kingdom31255 Posts

March 17 2012 01:00 GMT

#312

I propose Velinath gets Wheatley then - I have my reasons but I am going to need you to trust me on this one other whys I might screw towns chances at victory.

##Elect: Velinath

Drazerk

United Kingdom31255 Posts

March 17 2012 01:02 GMT

#316

On March 17 2012 10:01 Velinath wrote:

Show nested quote +

This by itself means I will simply refuse to ever vote you in as Wheatley. Nonaccountability isn't a good idea.

We should not trust anyone with Wheatley and just presumed they lied about the ability.

Drazerk

United Kingdom31255 Posts

March 17 2012 01:11 GMT

#324

On March 17 2012 10:08 Maverick32x wrote:

Show nested quote +

Geez, you really posted that rather quickly after he put his hat in there... I know you said that you'd like us to trust you.. but that's asking a lot..

I do appreciate Velinath's accountability though, more so than Gonzaw's...

Honestly that was just bad timing as you can see I have been posting rapidly all game I chose to vote for Velinath for something he had already done and wanted myself to be the one to propose him.

Drazerk

United Kingdom31255 Posts

March 17 2012 01:16 GMT

#328

On March 17 2012 10:13 Jayjay54 wrote:
I agree. gonzaw is not a good candidate.

also, self voting is as stupid as it could be and should be ruled out in any mafia game as it basically undermines the purpose of an election on day 1: give information to town.

It doesn't really matter yet but in the later hours we will be forcing people to consolidate their votes which should provide more information... if they do not comply well I guess we can always shoot more people.

Drazerk

United Kingdom31255 Posts

March 17 2012 01:19 GMT

#333

On March 17 2012 10:17 Blazinghand wrote:

Show nested quote +

...and.... we NEED to trust you? Come on, man, you can play better than this. So trigger happy, so poorly explained, on both your shot and your Elect vote. ;_; Let's get some serious cases here.

Look, I promised to lower taxes, raise spending,a nd balance the budget. What's your case for Veli? Like a real case.

I know he is the same as me or a DT.

Either way I am certain he is not scum and so gets my vote and I want you to vote for him.

Drazerk

United Kingdom31255 Posts

March 17 2012 01:23 GMT

#338

On March 17 2012 10:21 Bluelightz wrote:
My eyes O_O, I think that Wiggles is town and trustable for the elections, vote for the wiggul cause!

Wiggles is someone who should never win the election for several reasons

1) If he is scum we are screwed and there is no coming back
2) If he is town and it turns bad we are also screwed
3) I used an item on Wiggles and know he is not the same as me which makes me hesitant for anyone to vote for him without an excellent argument

Drazerk

United Kingdom31255 Posts

March 17 2012 01:25 GMT

#340

On March 17 2012 10:21 MidnightGladius wrote:

Show nested quote +

If that is the case, and we end up having to deal with renegade Wheatley, we'll be losing a PR. Why not elect a vanilla town like me, instead?

I do not believe in vannila townies considering the set up and what the game was originally going to be so you really might want to back track that claim.

Drazerk

United Kingdom31255 Posts

March 17 2012 01:28 GMT

#342

On March 17 2012 10:26 Bluelightz wrote:
Oh, Drazerks arguement just threw my argument out of the window, Unvoting Wiggles and gonna look at Veli, Drazerk, based on that item would you be fine for lynching him?

Not yet. Maybe later but not today we need wiggles to speak more and actually form a case also I am really looking at MidnightGladius for the lynch target today