Newbie Mini Mafia V

On March 01 2012 04:20 FourFace wrote:
OtoshimonoU where are you from?

On March 01 2012 12:30 Maverick32x wrote:
I agree- We should get a first day lynch if possible. I see your point OtoshimonU about being at a disadvantage- but I think we won't be gathering any information if we DON'T lynch.... plus it gives mafia a free kill on the first night. I hope everyone stays active since that is pretty much the only way we will be able win.

One question to you Trackdoor, you say "Don't be afraid to accuse anyone", but we really don't know ANYTHING right now. I'd like to try to stick to the facts/logic that are presented. Your post sounds really bold for being a first post. I'm not saying there is anything particularly scummy about that.. just something I noticed!

On March 01 2012 12:34 OtoshimonoU wrote:


I do believe that he got that quote from a Mafia Guide here on TL, and also it's his second time playing so he might have more experience that any of first timers.

On March 02 2012 04:20 trackd00r wrote:
Being very honest now, the activity in this game is too low.
I can't get solid reads because there haven't any substantial situations to study here. The only exception is Sufficiency little pressure and FoS and that would be all. We need to keep up with the discussion. If not, this lynch will be a mess.

About Sufficiency, I think he is town. No newbie mafia would try to catch up so much attention in that way. They'd rather stay more quiet and apparently contribute, which it's kinda working for them now.

Beorn1 hasn't posted anything yet.

The player I would worry right now is OtoshimonoU. He has been the least contributor (excluding beorn) so far. This is his only post with actual content.




Ok, I don't know if the bolded word is a scumslip or a newbie mistake. The second options is the most likely, but these details are the ones we should look for with the little information we have.

On March 02 2012 05:50 Mementoss wrote:


Zero content at all in this above post. (He bolded that part to make a point) OtoshimonoU getting mad/defensive about the point and his suspicious activity. Blames the suspicion it on lack of posting in first days, yet he posted three times pretty early (before most). Still has no logical discussion on who to lynch this week. Scared of bringing more attention to himself or fellow scum??

On March 02 2012 06:08 Mementoss wrote:


He wasn't complaining about your inactivity, in fact, other than me your one of the most active. In fact he's complaining about your (Post) to (Meaningful Post). Right now that ratio is 6:1. You've had seven posts, only one in which discusses what the town should be doing/ has some sort of active strategic value for getting rid of scum. Here it is:



Stating how you are against a first day lynch. All other posts have been filler. Even this post here is suspicious as you try to draw attention away from yourself and towards someone who is a non-poster. After that post you either post something that has nothing to do with anything. Or post something that agrees with someone 1 or more people have said, trying to blend in with ideas. This is the reason you posts have 0 content. Cause you don't want to attract attention to yourself by having a unique opinion.

On March 02 2012 11:19 Pablols wrote:
@ maverick

Thank you for putting that list together, I like the idea of everyone posting their top suspects and the reasoning behind it.
As of now this are my most suspected players

Sufficiency: I would really like for this guy to respond to some of the accusations, as it is now he seems to be dodging the questions. Maybe he is just busy with real life, but if he doesn't post again he is definitely worth looking at.

Mementoss: I have already explained in detail why I think his accusation towards me was illegitimate since he only responded to parts of my posts and left out crucial information. That is the reason why I think he could be scum, we should never misquote people or leave out important information when calling someone out.

Maverick: I suspect you less than the other two, but I must say that the following post made me feel as if you have some sort of connection with Mementoss:

"@Mementoss- Good reads. I also want to hear more from sufficiency!!! I know you guys are looking at OtoshimonoU and Pablols, but I didn't get a good a read off them intially... however based on that last post, I will agree that these are my main 3 suspects. Also I specifically asked a couple questions to some people, and I'm curious to see if they're sidestepped or if they confront the question.. "

You have the same suspects, and Mementoss later on responds to you in a friendly manner:
"... Also this is the second time you mentioned yourself being "bloodthirsty" lol.."

On March 05 2012 05:23 Maverick32x wrote:
How does voting for yourself make you innocent?

On March 05 2012 05:35 Sufficiency wrote:


^ I meant that If I were him and I was scum, and I were almost certain to get lynched, I would claim a PR and fish out the real PR.

dat slip. Hahaha.

On March 05 2012 07:22 blubbdavid wrote:
Power roles. Like DT, medic and so on. By claiming a PR it would make people hesitate to kill him, it would be a last ditch attempt to save his ass.

Judging from that you asked what PR is, I don't assume that you have one.

On March 05 2012 08:27 DimmuKlok wrote:
GG Mementoss, it's been fun.


OtoshimonoU, what is your read on Sufficiency? Also, who is your top scum read right now and why?

On March 06 2012 11:17 Sbrubbles wrote:
Well I'll be!