EPT
and I also propose that as of now we all say at the end of an accusation, "I dont know, lynch me."
Newbie Mini Mafia IV - Page 4
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
and I also propose that as of now we all say at the end of an accusation, "I dont know, lynch me." | ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On February 28 2012 08:26 Janaan wrote: Right now, I'd say it has to be between Chocolate and igabod. Igabod since he's lurking heavily and it'd send a message not to lurk. Chocolate, of all the people with cases against them seems the most scummy to me, and I can't quite put my finger on why exactly. But it doesn't make him scum. I think DYH makes a good point about how it's coming together a little too nicely when I can see all of Chocolate's posts from a town perspective. Unless something else comes up, I think I'll be sticking with ##Vote: igabod Janaan I ask that you consider voting for ghost, I really don't like how drastically sloosh's style has shifted, even alderaan who seems like he's playing a convincing town hasn't changed that much in terms of tone from last game when he was scum, sloosh sounds like a different person and I would like to put pressure on him by attacking his potential proxy, ghost. | ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On February 28 2012 08:28 Steveling wrote: Ye, I asked for replacement. Why is that steveling? Don't feel like playing scum again? Oh and if you don't mind could you drop all your reads by the door on your way out ? | ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On February 28 2012 08:29 Alderan wrote: I almost made literally the exact same post. The Chocolate thing is coming along too easily, I would have expected at least a case made against someone else. That in combination with his mildly sufficient answers have me reconsidering my vote. I would love for a case to come a long that was better, which is why I was asking everyone to come up with an opinion? I think Steveling is acting very suspiciously. I've found that after playing as scum, town is much more relaxing and less time consuming. I find it strange that he finds it the opposite. beat you to it read me post. | ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
| ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On February 28 2012 08:51 Janaan wrote: The problem that I have with this is that if SlOosh and Ghost were both scum, I doubt that SlOosh would be the first to call Ghost out. Maybe it's a bit WIFOM to say that, but all it did was bring more scrutiny to Ghost on Day 1, which is something that no scum team would want to inflict to themselves. I do agree with SlOosh's change in posting style, though. It's a pretty big change from his previous two games. I can understand him wanting to be a bit less aggressive this game, but it does seem a bit out of character. I was the first to pressure ghost and then alderaan put some pressure on ghost, if sloosh is scum I think he would've seen the righting on the wall and tried to address the issues ghost had caused by putting a bit of pressure on him, then ghost posts his defence and sloosh just drops his case on him and goes with the other obvious vote of chocolate, suddenly everyones dropped their suspicion of ghost, Sloosh is a clever player, its not impossible that he started the conflict so that he could control it. All I ask is that we all vote for ghost an already suspicious suspect, to get a feel for what Sloosh is up to, I am not accusing him right now I would just like some answers. That said I really don't like chocolates posting right now -_- he strikes me as too aggressive. Am open to voting for him if a ghost lynch is unobtainable. | ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On February 28 2012 09:03 Chocolate wrote: I would encourage you to vote on steveling, if igabod doesn't post in the next hour I'll change my vote to Steve. Chocolate what the smuch do you think of ghost? | ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On February 28 2012 09:21 Chocolate wrote: I had to haul ass to prevent myself from getting banned. I want to be aggressive, I played really passive last game and got lynched for it(I was mafia in that game though). I almost got lynched for it again this game (although this one is also due to inconsistencies). I feel like you're trying to get me to stop posting. Why is that? Do you really think I'm being too aggressive or do you disagree with my choices on who to lynch? I think your in a bad spot, and you need to start offering new possibilities or provide some evidence we haven't heard yet, the case against steven is threadbare at the moment, advocating his lynch makes you sound desperate to get the pressure of you and onto someone who isn't that obvious. Come back with something substantial because this game isn't about just not getting lynched, its about being able to convince town what the right decision is, and right now I see no reason to respect your opinion as much as I would some one else's, so you need to start making some headway for town. Now what do you think of ghost? I'm not going to ask you again -_- | ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On February 28 2012 09:30 Chocolate wrote: I agree with some of his views on lurkers, i.e. if we can't find anyone scummy we should lynch them. However, I disagree with because we shouldn't kill them for not being useful, but for possibly being hiding scum. Agree Kinda hypocritical, he "Tells us not to jump on the bandwagon. Immediately jumps on the bandwagon." The bolded part isn't entirely true, voting for someone that early and w/o evidence does not equate to lynching. Also criticizes me for wanting to lynch igabod, but he is happy to lynch lurkers. Dismisses my own cases. If push comes to shove I would vote for him to avoid my own lynch or a no-lynch, but if I had my druthers I would lynch someone else. Thank you very much. | ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On February 28 2012 09:31 k2hd wrote: Changing vote to igabod for reasons stated in my Previous post. iga's getting modkilled -_- if he pops up before vote then we can lynch him, please consider someone else. | ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On February 28 2012 09:36 Alderan wrote: As for FF's edited posts... the first one is actually not exactly what the original post was, but it get's the point across. He said some really weird convoluted stuff that if were true would be grounds for a ban. I saved reporting the second post to you guys for obvious reasons, didn't want the scum to see it before it was time. No reason to suspect it's true in all honesty. I don't even know what to think about it. It's getting about that time. Odds are good that either both Steveling and igabod will be replaced, or just Steveling will be replaced as he asked first, and igabod will be modkilled. The question now is, do we want to go for an additional lynch or not? I do, read my joint case on ghost and sloosh. | ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
| ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On February 28 2012 10:26 Alderan wrote: Is gum around? It's going to take mine and his votes as it stands now to get the majority. I'm here watcha need boss. | ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
| ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On February 28 2012 10:13 ghost_403 wrote: I completely disagree with you there. The entirety of the game has built up to this moment. Lynching either of us will give the town a plethora of information. You can look back and see who pushed for what lynch, who supported them, who jumped on board, who jumped off... quite frankly, lynching someone other than the two of us is wasteful. Lynching a non-posting lurker at this point tells you about them. Lynching either me or Chocolate tells you about everyone in the town. Just wanna say I really appreciate you saying this, I will take my vote off you. Unvote: Ghost(will do it in the thread) | ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
| ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On February 28 2012 11:20 JekyllAndHyde wrote: Before I forget: ##Unvote: Chocolate I'll vote for someone not likely to be lynched, that way there can't be a fast vote-swing towards him: ##Vote:DoYouHas da fuck? Why? | ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
If chocolate flips green(which he probably will considering it looks like he's getting bussed, not gonna lie about that) i'll take responsibility. | ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On February 28 2012 11:26 Chocolate wrote: You do realize that is basically a vote swing, which you state is bad? Stand by your words. If I get lynched we will get good info on alderan, gum, dyh, sloosh, Phagga, and night. Damm you chocolate why are making things so difficult P_P | ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On February 28 2012 11:30 DoYouHas wrote: Don't misrepresent me. I simply think that you cannot base the alignment of ghost based on the flip of Chocolate, or vice versa. Gum, a no-lynch isn't the end of the world, we are working with an incomplete set of information. Tomorrow the inactive situation will be settled and we can go from there. Lynching for information is bad. Welcome to the game Test, post lots. Yarg, I hate not lynching but you might be right, last game lynching you turned out to not at all be worth it, my vote stays on choc though, i'll leave it to every one else to decide if we want a lynch. | ||
| ||
