EPTBC's Arkham City - Page 2
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
| ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
+ Show Spoiler [better post some reads] + ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/lDFi3.png) | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
I am not feeling confident. Day1 blows. I will have to leave in an hour, is sheth/cyber the choice i have to make? | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On February 08 2012 07:12 Kurumi wrote: ##unvote ##vote -_-qualis Two scummy guys both cant be scum ... Rather ... Go town ... On February 08 2012 07:22 risk.nuke wrote: ##Vote: Liquid`Sheth get your behinds into the thread and explain yourselves | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
Do it. | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On February 08 2012 07:43 Cyber_Cheese wrote: At all the votes on me: We should satisfy the neutrals town targets asap so they don't have any reason to fire randomly. You can pray they DT if you want, but It's not something I want to rely on. I still feel like someone that could kill every night might do it just because they can, and I still suspect it's more optimal than DT'ing. I expect 2-3 groups arose to take a stance on my plan: -Mafia to shut it down -The townies who are targets, out of selfishness - But that's the last I'm going to say about it. Why do you expect 3rd party roles to behave rationally or optimally? If i was immune to all night hits and could kill through protection, even if it was not optimal i would probably just use that power because i could and because the consequences for missing do not cost me much at all. Some Players may just like to kill other players. Some players might be dumb and think it's optimal. A lot of players would just choose to shoot. We cannot control 3rd party roles and they cannot send us direct messages. A qt has been mentioned: On February 08 2012 05:47 Radfield wrote: Man.... Why did you claim schworz? Please stop talking about the mason thread BM, and please stop talking about a mass claim. The Mason thread is completely unimportant, and 99.99% infiltrated by scum, which is unsurprising when it contains half the player base. If you are not in the mason circle, don't worry. I would actually post the link to the thread to stop the discussion, but can't because Joker is basically exposed in that thread. Anyways, a 15 player circle has basically no value. Toad looks decent for now, so I'm switching to Sheth. His defense was mediocre at best, and he STILL only posted his reads upon being pressed. I don't even think he voted. I'm willing to switch to cyber_cheese if need be. I'm gone for the rest of the night pretty much until lynch time. ##Vote: Sheth a few things: since it's 99.99% infiltrated with scum the only players without knowledge of it's content will be 3rd party (though they could have access to it) and the town players not in it. Since apparently the Joker has outed themselves to scum anyway perhaps you should share it? You may still think that it's not worth outing the Joker but it would be nice if someone could shed some light on this whole "mason/neighbour" thing since the majority of players that will not know about it will be town-aligned. | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On February 07 2012 23:05 Kurumi wrote: + Show Spoiler [snipped] + Palmar, drop layabout to the scum list and it looks fine by me. And Toad could get to the Town section, because he is a mix of bored, drunk and honest townie at once. And he calls Batman badman for some reason. Like the hell. Also, because it's still Day 1 I want to bring up two things: Roles can have variations (something like paranoid doc or cop, etc) and we have traitors here On January 24 2012 14:08 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Insane inmates You are a insane beyond belief. As such you killed a tyger security guard and decided to wear his clothes. Basically, any Detective checks on you will mark you as a Tyger Security Guard . As you are now donned in the security guards uniform, you subject other inmates to the same punishments the guards gave to you. You win with the inmates even though you hate them. You also don't realize just how insane you are and as such think you are a regular inmate. Note: Some names appear under 2 categories. These players will have to decide to be one or the other for their role. They are not both. Some roles might also have slight alterations to the "standard" although nothing game breaking. Not all names listed are guarenteed to be in this game, however only names listed will be in this game. Each role, much like Asylum, will have unique flavour text to make the gf style roles have more fun with the game. See Arkham Asylum for flavour text examples that I used for when you submit your role choice. So during free time when You feel like actively lurking at least search for breadcrumbs from Traitors, if they exist. As role variations I guess sanity cops, suiciding vigs and maybe paranoid docs (protect+rb) Okay, enough of my setup rabble. I thought it's relevant to bring that to people so we know where are we standing. Yes, I know that discussing setup is the thing I've done the most. Oh well. I think Palmar is getting less bored and more productive.. at least hope he does. Also, HUGE FoS on WBG on getting the Schworz case back (First Toad then quick switch to him). This lynch is going to reach the level of absurd amazingxckd lynch got in one of the games I played. He claimed DT and was against guy who wrote nothing to defend himself and got lynched. At least gtrsrs got iGrok hung. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=305850¤tpage=22#432 The biggest part is pushing arguement saying "Claiming day 1 is ok and it's by no means anti-town" Also: Two shady people support wbg: BillMurray (although: he voted for Kenpachi first, no reaction till now) DoctorHelvetica Look: There's NO POINT in defending Kenpachi Everyone who defends him tries to prove that claiming day 1, be it false or not is not bad and does not give any info about his alignment THIS IS FALSE. This is also trying to drive attention off Kenpachi. Schworz looks like new, irratiated town to me. Why? Because I was IN THE SAME FUCKING SPOT. Also, his actions make sense. Schworz is Town. People I think are mafia: Cyber_Cheese DoctorHelvetica -_-Qualis wherebugsgo Kenpachi Probably Mafia: Layabout I haven't looked into Sheth case. Give me some time. thinks CC is mafia On February 08 2012 07:34 Kurumi wrote: I am afraid because i have no time and my targets are not exactly the candidates Didnt look into sheth or cc too much is vote wbg if it would matter but it doesnt so i voted qualis because he is my strong scum read too didn't look into CC much ... | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
Also layabout, stop posting your goddamn reads on every player. When you post stuff on every player in the game (like that chart) you are bound to get manipulated It's why a lot of vets say don't seed the thread with your town reads; what's it going to accomplish? If they're actually scum they'll be delighted to be called town, and if they're town then scum will kill them because too many people think they're town. Tedious shit: I mostly wanted to show off the batman logo i drew. if you wish to mindfuck me simply post as if you are intelligent and i will likely just decide that you are town. (i am looking at you LSB!  )Relevant shit: Sheth has reacted by putting in some effort like a town player would. He doesn't look great but he doesn't look all that bad Cyber cheese has yet to make himself look green at all and still focuses on 3rd party roles. His actions indicate anti-town intentions. I will be leaving my vote on Cyber_Cheese I hope that you find and lynch scum while i sleep. | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
##Vote: Kurumi i do not want town blood on my hands! These lynches suck | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
If you are on Jackal's list can you please confirm/deny it's existence, it can only help town. | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
| ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
We could also have claims confirmed or even have additional claims. We should have a lot more information in the morning. Because of this i do not planning to lynch one of Jackal/Palmar tomorrow will be productive, deciding the lynch based on claims now would also be really bad for the town atmosphere. | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
| ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On February 09 2012 05:33 Palmar wrote: I got this, I'll post an explanation in the QT. We're picking shit up tomorrow. Just shut up for now. you just claimed that you could message each other privately.. | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
Lurkers are hard to read by nature as they do not produce content that can be analysed. Players that provide content can be more easily analysed, and can be more easily read. (which some exceptions) Because of this it is likely that players that shoot based off of their reads will be shooting into active players. (mainly 3rd party and vig's). Scum are unlikey to kill lurkers because town players that lurk are (generally) less threatening to scum than town players that try to contribute. We need to be weary of only focusing on/only firing into active players especially as we seem to have outed quite a number of our power roles and we cannot rely on them living for very long. Don't shoot into the active players unless you have a strong read, you can make a better decision later on. | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
| ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On February 09 2012 06:03 BloodyC0bbler wrote: if it wasn't there would be a large # of modkills at this point. | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On February 09 2012 08:18 Jayjay54 wrote: you don't care what anyone thinks, which makes you useless. no it doesn't. | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On February 08 2012 18:56 Tunkeg wrote: Also this might just become my trademark. You've allready seen one scum in this game (read layabout) back down from a fight with me because of all the unwanted attention it gets. And he wouldn't back down from a fight otherwise. Back up your accusations or stop calling me scum. The risk reward stuff is crap, other people's play can be frustrating but if you are town then you have to learn to deal with it Playing in a manner that frustrates others is not scummy. It is likely that such players will be in every game and if you cannot play well around them... you will never play well. How do you not see the harm in unreasonably pursuing another player on the basis that they are frustrating you (if you are town). The likely outcome is two dead town, you and your target. One or both of you could be blue. Since you have provided no reasoning, if you did mange to kill chaoser and he flipped red it would be because of dumb luck. I also feel that you have mis-handled the issue with Dr.H, the "argument" and "opinion" about a joker claim. Dr.H explained why a joker claim was a bad idea, he gave clear reasons as to why the alternative was better and why the Joker claim would hurt town. Your response was: "i disagree". ( i know you tried to explain yourself but come on: Well, both your way, Dr H's way and my way might all be viable strategies for Batman, it depends on many things though. You had a layout for optimal Batman play, and I had one as well But I do not know what Batman will chose, and therefor I write that all three choices are viable strategies. Since the argument is about what is optimal, you cannot say, well this is viable and this is viable so i think we can just disagree. It is something that can be argued and a conclusion could have been reached. Instead you try to say that everyone is entitled to an opinion and then refuse to change you own one. If that was your stance you should never have entered into that discussion in the first place. I responded to your case and you response was fairly open confusion The difference here is that you haven't done anything worthwhile. I am not sure how to interpret your reply to me here, I was both hoping and fearing at the same time that you would come out guns a blazing at me. Hoping because that somehow would show that you didn't fear getting into a attention seeking fight, fearing because it might have caused me to tunnel you forever. This calm collected answer worries me... I am not sure how to procede here. My vote stays on you for now. Convice me otherwise by doing some good posts. Don't think you can continue to call me scum after i refuted your arguments and you reacted by not contesting my response but instead posting that you did not know how to interpret my post. Rather than looking at what i had said and trying to analyse it, it seems to me that you expected me to react aggressively if i was town, and you would judge me based upon how aggressive i was. Since i did not react the way you anticipated me to you were unsure of what to conclude. Thing is you really haven't brought forth any arguments after this. So tell me why am i still on your scumlist? Why would you hope that i would drag you into an attention seeking fight? It seems that you expected me to react that way as town. Are you disappointed that i didn't? Did you expect that because you know i am town? A fight is not the best way for a townie to respond to a case against them, It derails discussion and distracts from our day1 goals. It harms the town atmosphere. You should not being trying to start them Your interactions with chaoser stink of bad play. You begin by attacking him with a metaphor (which is silly). You continue this for a few posts, then you just generally say he is posting bullshit. You say that you liked CC joker claim and choose to vote for sheth over him. You say you still think i am scummy for "still not convincing you that i am town" and am thus your strongest read. (which is horrible logic, you cannot expect all town players to show that they are town on day1, the huge number of null reads you should have had should be proof enough of this) + Show Spoiler [here] + On February 08 2012 07:23 Tunkeg wrote: So, this is going to be between Sheth and CC then (and perhaps rgST, but I am not voting for a claimer tonight, that would be like doing scum a favor, rgST will be killed off soon enough, and in the meanwhile he needs to post his checks and his findings to keep pressure on scum, or reveal himself as a scum (unless he is the scum DT ofcourse). On one hand you have CC who have done the rgST push and started the Joker Claim thing. After awhile it was pretty much me and DrH going back and forth on it, CC leaving me high and dry pretty much. I still belive that Joker claim would be pro-town, but CC might had a hidden plan (that I don't see) in getting me or anyone else going along with this plan lynched (meaning he is scum) or he is Batman (wanting the easy kill on Joker). For Sheth he haven't posted anything that I consider pro-town yet. He flip-flopped on the whole Joker thing, and as soon as he got attention from DrH he just switched 180 around. Am I sold that anyone of them is scum. No, not at all, would I be more content with lynching layabout, yes indeed (he haven't convinced me he is town, and still is my strongest read). Will I make my vote count? Yes, and I will swing it on Sheth, as I think it is more likely that he is scum than CC. ##Vote Liquid`Sheth then this + Show Spoiler [click] + On February 08 2012 17:59 Tunkeg wrote: So CC was town and was pro Joker Claim, that makes us two townies out of two who favored the Joker Claim. I belive the scum team also see the plan as pro town and therefor sent one of theirs to shut down the plan. DrH are you scum? Or would that be to obvious. I think you are scum. Next chaoser you are a clueless jerk, you have earned yourself a spot on the Tunkeg tunneling train, I will have my vote on you for as long as either of us are in the game. If I had a vig shot I would use it on you. You were wrong about CC, and you are wrong about me. You got shit for logic, you came late and just crapped all over the thread. You are either scum or very expendable. Its either you or me, someone have to go, I'm fine either way. Layabout is still my secound choice as scum, for all the reasons I have said before. He doesn't look like town layabout and if the shoe doesn't fit, well, he is scum. Bill Murray is also probably scummy, all of his claiming and masoning posts are just confusing (though very entertaining). So my hit list in order of priority is: chaoser layabout DrH BillMurray You call Dr.H scum for trying to stop the Joker claiming on day 1. Even though earlier you had been quick to say that his suggestion for what to do was an valid opinion to have, now you call him scum for it. Thinking that a day1 Joker claim is bad is not scummy, it's common sense. Furthermore you can expect players, particularly experienced players to post sensibly about plans as both town and scum, since plans rarely come to anything but are easy to post about without having to push your agenda. Sometimes players will propose bad plans to push their agenda, but if they do so you have to catch them, and explain why their plan is pro-Mafia very clearly since players can have very split opinions about the values of plans even after the game. + Show Spoiler + In hammer mini mafia there were an number of plans about vote-trading discussed during and after the game but no clear conclusion was reached. This differs from the Joker claim situation because the vote-trade situation was far more complex You then call Chaoser a name. You commit to tunnelling him. Why? Because he was wrong about CC's alignment and because he is "wrong about you". You then call his logic shit (with no explanation) and say he is scum or expendable. You go further a say "it's you or me, someone have to go". You do not explain how his actions are scummy. You do not back up your criticisms. You then call me scummy but provide no new reasons. (bringing your valid reason total to still zero). Next you say BM is scummy for being confusing. Earlier you had posted this: On February 08 2012 02:45 Tunkeg wrote: + Show Spoiler + On February 08 2012 02:39 Bill Murray wrote: hahaha, tunkeg, my boy, sit down and watch the pro at work there is this thing called having your medics protect different people (like me!) there is a thing called coordinating your vigilantes so they dont hit the same people there is a thing called a detective check if we massclaim (and im trying to get you all to see we should) we actually will have more KP than the mafia, + lynch and batman... how is that bad? i ALREADY have a giant crosshair on me, furthermore. I would be killed off just as easily as someone like Radfield, due to my scumhunting prowess later in the game via votecounting analysis. I like your style. You make this game intersting indeed. But I don't like it from a town perspective. I think your claim is just so annoyingly confusing. You make a halfassed claim that is impossible for anyone to verify, you could just as well be scum with a crazy plan or Batman/CW doing something crazy. I am not sure if I am right about this, but my thoughts are that if you are going to claim anything, then at least do us the courtesy to claim it in full. Apparently you find his posts "annoyingly confusing" and and you think he "lacks courtesy". You do not explain how this is scummy. Also this might just become my trademark. You've allready seen one scum in this game (read layabout) back down from a fight with me because of all the unwanted attention it gets. And he wouldn't back down from a fight otherwise. I do not think your approach to the game is good. I do not see what i can accomplish by fighting you in the thread. What could town possibly gain from me arguing that you are wrong or me calling you stupid? + If i didn't want attention why would i post ms. paint pics, polls and jovial crap? + who in their right mind would actually focus on that garbage? Tunkeg: Please cut out posts like this + Show Spoiler + On February 09 2012 05:15 Tunkeg wrote: You are an asshole. But tell me why it is impossible then mr scum! Right now your pursuit of Chaoser is anti-town. | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On February 09 2012 08:28 Jayjay54 wrote: yea silly me, lying to town is always helpful to town. maybe we have a different understanding of town play. yes silly you. not caring what other people think =/= being useless that is all | ||
| ||
