EPTC = GGQ
Note that I expected people to follow me because my argument was awesome. Of course I hadn't counted on how terrible Refallen was but meh.
Sleeper Cell Mafia II - Page 53
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Hesmyrr
Canada5776 Posts
C = GGQ Note that I expected people to follow me because my argument was awesome. Of course I hadn't counted on how terrible Refallen was but meh. | ||
|
Cwave
Netherlands313 Posts
![[image loading]](http://jonellg.files.wordpress.com/2011/07/pulse.jpg) | ||
|
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
Dammit red why did you do that. Should totally ask the mods to delay the ban.  | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
![[image loading]](http://irinakot.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/flatline.jpg) | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
 | ||
|
Barbiero
Brazil5259 Posts
You think Lanaia should pre-claim who she will check? I don't think scum have any form of PRs, considering she was never roleblocked - and the most common scum PR is a scum RB. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
| ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On February 07 2012 05:39 Zephirdd wrote: Well, worst thing about night is the fact that there isn't much to discuss, especially when we are waiting for a DT check. You think Lanaia should pre-claim who she will check? I don't think scum have any form of PRs, considering she was never roleblocked - and the most common scum PR is a scum RB. You wanna duck out for the night or something? | ||
|
Barbiero
Brazil5259 Posts
| ||
|
Barbiero
Brazil5259 Posts
On February 07 2012 05:44 Jackal58 wrote: You wanna duck out for the night or something? what | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On February 07 2012 05:46 Zephirdd wrote: idk, in the event she dies? idk if it would benefit us, I just hate this lack of posting =| If she dies I will be extremely pissed. | ||
|
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
I will be extremely pissed if I die as well. | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On February 07 2012 05:46 Zephirdd wrote: idk, in the event she dies? idk if it would benefit us, I just hate this lack of posting =| So.... if she dies, how is knowing who she would have checked if she hadn't died useful? | ||
|
Barbiero
Brazil5259 Posts
Or we just hope she doesn't die. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On February 07 2012 06:29 Zephirdd wrote: maybe we create connections. Imagine if she said "I'll totally check GGQ." People will react to the GGQ check, both positively and negatively, then she dies. We won't know what GGQ was, but we get connections from the reactions. Am I wrong? Or we just hope she doesn't die. I don't see how this is made any better by lanaia dying. Whatever discussion is generated between now and dawn would be generated regardless of whether she dies 2 and a half hours from now... | ||
|
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
| ||
|
Barbiero
Brazil5259 Posts
On February 07 2012 06:31 Blazinghand wrote: I don't see how this is made any better by lanaia dying. Whatever discussion is generated between now and dawn would be generated regardless of whether she dies 2 and a half hours from now... Well, for instance a discussion that would be generated regardless doesn't have much impact. We could discuss a lot about players and whatnot, but when we involve the use of a power role like that, people can't just have a wishy-washy instance over that. This could be applied even if Lanaia didn't really check the one she mentions, so not even possible framers would use the opportunity. | ||
| ||
