Steamship Liquidia (TL Mafia 46) - Page 3

On November 24 2011 00:42 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote:
Anyone else want to contribute?
Zephirdd, Nisani, DCLXVI, Greymist, Cyber_cheese, Lanaia, Forumite
These 7, kill them all. I welcome analysis on them if anyone wants to do it.

On November 24 2011 00:53 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote:
As for those who stand out more scummy, I read a bit more of the the thread and Forumite, Greymist, Nisani, Zephirdd seem the most scummy out of my list. I'd suggest everyone at least vote for them.

On November 23 2011 18:37 Tyrran wrote:
Okay, here is my blue reads :

Lanaia : She made a dumb mistake in the early game, revealing her double vote ability. In addition to that, she migth have a weak pardonner role, as she thought for a moment to be able to save prplhz.

Cyber_cheeze : He his a powerful version of a Watcher. Look at this post :
He seems to know what happened to me during day nigth, so i'd say he is a mixup between a watcher and a rolecop. (maybe with a drawback of some kind as this role seems a bit too powerful).

hysche : With Drazerk revealed as the weak Mason, i think we can all safely assume that hysche is the strong Mason. He is likely a Mason/Bulletproof mixup.


DCLXVI: Kenpachi role was revealed as the Newbie Doctor. I beleive DCLXVI is an experienced doctor . Please have a look at :. and
From this I deduce that it is likely that DCLXIV is able to protect multiple target during one nigth !, but with a drawback ( usable only once/ not every nigth?)

EVERYONE PLEASE UNVOTE DCLXVI. I DO NOT WANT ANOTHER BLUE LYNCH TODAY

On November 24 2011 01:17 Nisani201 wrote:
If I get lynched, and flip town, will you guys kill Palmar/WBG for me?

On November 24 2011 02:09 Kibibit wrote:

I'll step out here then, since I'm trying to be less confused here. Is there any particular reason I'm not on that short list? I've lurked fairly hard and I did vote prplhz.I'm willing to go over my reasoning as to why. Right now, my activity pretty much puts me up on the chopping block without much defense to go on if we lynch any more townies.

On November 24 2011 18:52 Palmar wrote:
I just want to voice my disagreement with any plans of lynching more than at most 2 people.

On November 24 2011 19:15 Palmar wrote:
I will hand out my suggestions in a timely manner, I do have to re-read a few people to settle down. I am alarmed by your inclination of believing every blue claim there is out there Tyrran. Let's take for example Cyber-cheese and DCLXVI, they were put in a position where not claiming a blue role would mean they're lying and should be lynched.

So, neither of their claims should be taken for granted. I am not saying that we should outright lynch one or two of them, but for example Cyber-cheese's claim of tracking you sounds a little absurd, doesn't it? I mean, why would someone hunting for mafia on day 1 track a player that's pretty much accepted as a very likely town?

On November 25 2011 01:15 Forumite wrote:

Number of times a player has voted on Nisani201
bumatlarge (3)
wherebugsgo (3) --> I have a town read on him, but i'm less convinced than for others.
Palmar (2)
Drazerk (2)
GreYMisT (2)
DCLXVI (2)
Lemonwalrus (1)
xsksc (1)
RebirthOfLeGenD (1)
MrZentor (1)
Tyrran (1)
Coagulation (1)
sinani206 (1)
Cyber_Cheese (2-1=1)
Lanaia (1-0=1)

On November 25 2011 01:21 Forumite wrote:
And no, voting for Nisani201 doesn´t make you scum, but if Scum wanted Town to lynch Nisani201 on their own, then those who voted several times, like WBG, would be poor targets for a Nightkill. I dont get your argument. If Nisani was scum, then wouldnt those who voted several time for him make very GOOD target for a nigthkill ?

Including D3 votes when considering N2 kills might not make much sense, so below is the list for only D1 and D2.

Day 1:
Nisani201 (6): bumatlarge, wherebugsgo, Palmar, Drazerk, GreYMisT, sinani206 --> Palmar was hit

Day 2:
Nisani201 (9): Drazerk, wherebugsgo, Lanaia, Lemonwalrus, xsksc, Cyber_Cheese, DCLXVI, Cyber_Cheese, GreYMisT, Lanaia, bumatlarge --> Drazerk was killed

On November 23 2011 01:32 Tyrran wrote:


You just gave the worst possible excuse. Prplhz made a case against risk.nuke, who succefully defended himself and nothing happened. THAT WAS GOOD. That's how mafia is supposed to be played. Player put pressure on each other to make them slip. You played IRL mafia, how do you not know this ? You voted against prp because he played good. You dont lynch people because they made a case against someone else. you suspect them because of this, you build a case against them and if they fail to defend themself you lynch them.

Quite frankly, this look like a scum, wondering "Can I safely bandwagon? Oh yeah he voted for a town so i'm safe".

Oh and going trough your filter i find this :



Lynching 6 people on day 2 ? Really ? You are obviously using the fact that Ken and Sinani played bad in order to lynch as much town as possible.( I take good not that 4 out of 6 are likely town, and 2 of them are blue. Thank god nobody listen to you). This has to be the most mafia oriented play yet. Yes you had to be drunk to post something like this. How did we not lynch you? Oh rigth, because you are lurking and not getting any attention. Typical mafia play again.

Also, I'm not forgetting that this makes a lot of sense if you are mafia and you intent to lurk a lot.

And last but not least :
Saying obvious stuff without contributing a bit. Mafia play again.

You have so many scummy play in so little post, I will definitely try to get you lynched on day 3. And if i dont survive nigth 2, I hope someone else will remind town to lynch you.

On November 25 2011 03:30 Forumite wrote:

Scum wanted today to be spent lynching Nisani, so they killed a few players who didn´t care about lynching Nisani. After 2 failed attempts to kill Nisani to frustrate Town, and now with less people who think he is town/don´t care either way, the Nisani lynch was made much easier. Scum are manipulating the lynches, that shouldn´t be a surprise.

When looking at it like that, it´s possible that Drazerk was killed by a Vigilante, in order to confirm hyshes.

On November 25 2011 08:12 Forumite wrote:

Why doesn´t it make sense? If Nisani was Scum, wouldn´t Scum have killed Palmar or WBG, or someone else actually out to lynch palmar, in order to get some pressure off of him? Shooting those NOT pushing Nisani means that Nisani dies, it´s simple and direct, and if Nisani is Town then it´s also Pro-Scum to do this, because 5/6 of the day was spent dealing with Nisani. We always lynch our first 12 hours before deadline, then rush secondary lynches, so one obvious target for the day means Town basically waste the day.

Why vote now, and not a few hours ago when I posted the analysis?

On November 25 2011 18:19 Palmar wrote:
Lynch me please

##Vote Palmar

I have no interest in playing with people who don't want to try. I am sorry for signing up for this game.

On November 25 2011 18:55 Forumite wrote:

Fine. If you want to do a weird stunt then I´ll oblige. If Palmar is calling people bad for doubting him, and now wants to fake giving up, then I´ll help, because acting like that warrants a lynch.

##Vote: Palmar

On November 25 2011 19:42 Palmar wrote:
Killing these people (+ the people who don't care) should be a good idea.

Something like


##Vote Cyber_Cheese
##Vote Forumit
##Vote Sabin010
##Vote DCLXVI
##Vote xsksc

Let's leave the others for now.



Can I request Coagulation be modkilled for inactivity? In addition Kibibit should be pretty close to a modkill.

On November 25 2011 20:08 Forumite wrote:

I can´t know if 1 is true, and 2 isn´t required, it´s just a general sense of the defence. You can´t honestly say that the last turn, Palmar calling everyone bad, isn´t more focused on the voter rather than defending Palmar.

This isn´t an exact science, scum know what Chainsaw Defence is and will try to avoid it, but this affair with Palmar giving up, and you and Tyrran defending him unquestioningly, reminds me of a Scum Chainsaw Defence, because of the coordination and focus on throwing doubt on the attacker.