EPTFirst game hopefully I can figure it out
Newbie Mini Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Chocolate
United States2350 Posts
First game hopefully I can figure it out | ||
|
Chocolate
United States2350 Posts
| ||
|
Chocolate
United States2350 Posts
| ||
|
Chocolate
United States2350 Posts
On October 31 2011 00:53 Drem903 wrote: The thing with xsksc was pretty much just a joke to try and get the ball rolling. The only person that has really garnered any suspicion from me is bunneh, and that's only because his posts seem to be "posts for the sake of posting" rather than trying to really get anything dones. He only seems to post to try and appear active. Posts for posting's sake is an empty phrase. Posts for the sake of truth, posts for the sake of the good and the beautiful, those are the posts that I am searching for. But seriously toad is looking a little suspicious. The people that would benefit the most from knowing who are dt/medic are the mafia. For the town, it's best if nobody knows, to present a difficult target. | ||
|
Chocolate
United States2350 Posts
| ||
|
Chocolate
United States2350 Posts
| ||
|
Chocolate
United States2350 Posts
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=180405 Finger of suspicion | ||
|
Chocolate
United States2350 Posts
On October 31 2011 07:28 Toadesstern wrote: Ok and now I read that thing from chocolate as well. I want you to explain that. Why is it a fos on ciry. I could understand a fos on zanfa although I don't believe it's strange since it totally fits in his style. Well and ciry is the only guy who started a real discussion. Everyone spammed a bit to get something going at all an he went for real talks, like "explain your thoughts" and stuff and from what I see it looks like he is trying to get people to make quality posts rather than spam. Totally fits in his style as well. Go ahead, blame me for defending, which I still think is wrong at this point, but I want your explanation on this. We obviously got very little right now but given what we have there's definitly people around looking more scummy. If you are talking to me I explained why I fos'ed zanfa. However I am having trouble understanding your post, particularly who "you" is. | ||
|
Chocolate
United States2350 Posts
| ||
|
Chocolate
United States2350 Posts
| ||
|
Chocolate
United States2350 Posts
| ||
|
Chocolate
United States2350 Posts
##vote Skrammen Toad im sorry to hear that you are suspicious of me, but I think its just due to communication errors more than anything else. I did note suspicion on you at first but I withdrew once you explained your reasoning. Once again, you can look back at my posts to verify. Zanfa has my suspicion but not enough yet to warrant a vote. | ||
|
Chocolate
United States2350 Posts
On November 01 2011 04:05 Skrammen wrote: @Chocolate + Show Spoiler + Definitely FOS on Zanfada now. Needlessly aggressive, fos on ciryandor for defending him, even though what you did at first was a smart and good thing to do as it opened discussion. And yeah, having almost no evidence for any of his fos but saying a lot of empty words is kinda :/ http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=278558¤tpage=11#210 + Show Spoiler + Toad i did not fos ciry. Filter my posts and look at them if you dont believe me. I only fosd zanfa, and noted suspicion with you that i have since withdrawn. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=278558¤tpage=12#234 Not once did you FoS on me, yet you preffered to vote me instead of zanfa. You also FoS'd Ciry but claim you didnt. You seem to be a bit everywhere, throwing suspicions left and right. To me, it appears like you are trying to be a bit of an instigator while saying very little of substance. You've posted nearly as little as I have done, and you say you vote me because of lack of activity? ##Vote Chocolate It's day one, there are no leads except those that we can get from goading others. Nobody did anything to garner enough suspicion to warrant a vote in my opinion so I voted you, hoping that it would cause you to say something and it worked. I will probably take back my vote but I may not as I still need to digest what you said. Also, about this thing about me "fos'ing ciry" Perhaps this is some weird way that I communicate that no one else uses, but Needlessly aggressive, fos on ciryandor for defending him to me seems like I was noting what zanfa said about ciry, since I also described zanfa about being needlessly aggressive.Hopefully that clears things up. | ||
|
Chocolate
United States2350 Posts
| ||
|
Chocolate
United States2350 Posts
| ||
|
Chocolate
United States2350 Posts
Here's a list of players and votes+ Show Spoiler + 1. risk.nuke Toadesstern 2. HarbingerOfDoom Skrammen 3. Toadesstern Skrammen 4. Zanfada Skrammen 5. xsksc Skrammen 6. Ciryandor Skrammen 7. hacklebeast toadesstern 8. Skrammen Chocolate 9. hyshes Zanfada 10. Drem903 Zanfada 11. IMABUNNEH Toadesstern 12. Chocolate Skrammen | ||
|
Chocolate
United States2350 Posts
On November 01 2011 08:07 HarbingerOfDoom wrote: If Skrammen wants any chance of me changing my vote from him to someone else, I need him to answer my earlier request, which I will repeat here: What are your opinions of Toad and Zanfada, Skrammen? And me, he did vote for me after all. | ||
|
Chocolate
United States2350 Posts
On November 01 2011 09:25 risk.nuke wrote: Why the wagon is on skrammen and on nobody else is because Ciryandor voted for him. Ciryandor have been trying to take a leading role and taking charge of town. Ciry have been tring to establish himself as one of the better players. And his been pretty pro-town. That's why this post is so suspicious because it's shit in and Ciry should know this. Well if Skrammen turns out green we will have an idea of who to go for next/investigate. If Skrammen turns out red then we know almost for certain who to go for . To be honest we barely have anything to work with now and he seems to be the prime suspect (at least imo he is). Also the risk vs. reward is pretty good. If we take out a mafia there are only two left and they won't be too hard to find. If we take out a town then we should have some some good ideas of who the mafia are, although we will be a little crippled vote-wise. | ||
|
Chocolate
United States2350 Posts
| ||
|
Chocolate
United States2350 Posts
On November 03 2011 06:10 Drem903 wrote: chocolate[spoiler] - last post was about being more agressive against people who make mistakes and he has contributed next to nothing to any of the conversations. His only other notable post was to just say what everyone else said and point out that SKrammen was the prime suspect. Major point to take from this: If chocolate is Mafia, then SKrammen likely isn't. Also, as SKrammen pointed out in one of his posts, chocolate never made a case against him, but was quick to vote for him. I have been gone the entire day as it has been very very busy. I will try to post again later tonight. | ||
|
Chocolate
United States2350 Posts
| ||
|
Chocolate
United States2350 Posts
While yeah I agree toad is a little fishy it is in the town's best interest to get a lynch on day one because if they get a mafia it's easy to just pick out the people that defended him. Of course the plan can back fire but the reward is so great... And the same goes for today. If you flip red, then w00t we will probably win. If you flip green, then we can narrow down the mafia to the people that voted for you. The reason I'm picking on you is 1) you have the most votes and 2) you seem a little fishy, and that whole voting for yourself business was weird. | ||
|
Chocolate
United States2350 Posts
sermo's reasoning is very good he has jumped on every bandwagon and has played a little scummy and weird the entire game the reason I have not been posting 1) my computer is broken so I have to use my phone and 2) i havent had much to add and 3) I have lost my beginning energy because this game is a little more boring than I thought it was going to be, obviously this is in part due to my inactivity. I might ask for a sub soon. | ||
|
Chocolate
United States2350 Posts
| ||
|
Chocolate
United States2350 Posts
Harb better be quick. If you all lynch me for no reason I will be pretty angry. But, we will also have a good idea of who could be mafia. Over all though the lack of any reasoning from 2 people is suspicious. | ||
|
Chocolate
United States2350 Posts
On November 07 2011 10:13 Drem903 wrote: well, you also never followed up on your promise: I know you keep saying you're having computer problems, but an excuse to not post doesn't really help anyone's case, and the only way to get information is through post analysis. If a person isn't posting, it becomes suspicious. You claim to have a reason, and in any other kind of thread where you were an active part of discussion this would be acceptable, but in this kind of thread you could also be a mafia who's trying to use any excuse to avoid posting and risking some kind of slip. Ok those are actually some good reasons. First, I couldn't follow up on my promise because I ran out of time and found out I had school work to do, and frankly I was too lazy to actually do that. sermokala did it quite well, however. Second, I haven't posted a bunch because I don't know what to say because this is my first game and there is little hard evidence from anyone i.e. there is no certain tell that we can use to find the other scum. Many of my posts were filler because I wanted to be active, and some of them were to avoid confusion. Ultimately these are pretty good reasons, but it will still be a mistake to lynch me. I understand if you do though. | ||
|
Chocolate
United States2350 Posts
 | ||
| ||
