Werewolves Invade TeamLiquid

On August 09 2011 08:43 GMarshal wrote:He *really* likes werewolves? :-P

On August 10 2011 06:38 slam500 wrote:
my one last question is that the rules say both

and

so can ghosts post multiple times to "haunt taunt and flaunt"? or not?

On August 11 2011 09:09 Nisani201 wrote:
Actually, me and Palmar are changing places. So I will now be the super-active one, while Palmar will post very little and be scummy.

On August 14 2011 07:24 chaos13 wrote:
From what I understand, there is no 24 hour night cycle. Actions are sent in during the day phase, and they lynch and any subsequent night actions happen at the same time.

So it goes

Day 1
-48 hours
-During this time we must all vote on a lynch, and any night actions must be sent in.

"Night Post"
-Learn lynch results as usual
-Learn mafia night kills as would USUALLY happen after another 24 hours
-Day 2 begins


So a full cycle is only 48 hours. We just don't have to put up with a 24 hour period of waiting for night to end.

On August 14 2011 07:28 Jackal58 wrote:Do I sknow you from somewhere else?

On August 15 2011 06:01 GreYMisT wrote:
I also agree with Claiming the above Traits. Claiming Rabid fanboy is a good call too. i didn't think about that. The only problem with that is that the second in command might be a member of the Mafia, and we will have just given them additional power. Im not sure exactly into who's hands that would play out though.

I also agree with your plan on Voting and cells. the last thing we need in this game is multitown kills and dissenting factions within the town.

On August 15 2011 06:43 DropBear wrote:
It is less likely for Mafiosos to be paired with Townies as rivals. Mafia and Townies are already opposed. Mafia are not going to be paired with themselves either, its hard enough being a mafioso as it is without completely disrupting the team. I would be very confident that any rivals are Town/Town.

If we do get a Townie/Mafioso rival pairing, the townie should claim now. If the Mafioso denies the pairing, they will be killed for lying as soon as the townie flips. If he ignores the claim, he will be offed as well. He has to confirm the claim or he is dead. The mafioso in the pair can't win unless that person dies, so he can't just bring them to endgame. He's under pressure to stay hidden but he absolutely has to take out his rival as well. Pressure on scum is a good thing

How do you feel about the other claims I suggested?

On August 15 2011 06:57 GreYMisT wrote:
No, i agreed with some of the overall idea, but if you notice in the post I actually give a reason why role claiming the Rabid fanboy could be detrimental as his death could inadvertantly give the maifia power.

I would like to state that i feel as though claiming rivals might not be the best idea now that i think about it. I feel as though it might cause more harm and confusion than ultimate good.

On August 15 2011 07:16 Forumite wrote:
EBWOP

In case it wasn´t clear, I´m against mass claiming.

On August 15 2011 07:47 Navillus wrote:
Also on claiming I'm not policy opposed to claims but I think that for it to work someone needs to figure out exactly who should claim, what we do with them when they do, and what we do with people who should have claimed and didn't. This has not been done and it doesn't look like it will be done so I'm against claiming here, especially because in this game we can't know if someone should have claimed and didn't until it's probably too late we know the traits that need claiming not the people so overall I don't think anyone should claim today just for the sake of claiming.

On August 15 2011 08:55 Forumite wrote:
Sounds good, great idea Sknowman.

On August 15 2011 09:52 Jackal58 wrote:So if a townie thief targets a scum he becomes scum And then he targets a townie and becomes townie. And then he outs the entire scum team. Damn wish I was the thief.

On August 16 2011 04:22 GreYMisT wrote:


This seemed to indicate no KPs first night

On August 16 2011 04:34 Nisani201 wrote:

Maybe he doesn't want a townie to get lynched because of stupid evidence like that.

In other news, I think we should start discussing Slam. He hasn't posted yet, but I don't really see what information we would gain from him "defending" himself that isn't already in Varp's chat log. And I highly doubt that the logs are fake because it's so easy for Slam to just nullify them anyways. What are people's thoughts?

On August 17 2011 09:40 Varpulis wrote:
alright, here are our options, as i see them:

• We lynch nisani anyways (bad)
  
• we lynch forumite to confirm nisani (ok)
  
• we pick another person to lynch (also ok)
  

##unvote

On August 16 2011 21:44 Sknowman wrote:
Forumite gave me a scummy vibe from the beginning. His posts are empty, and it seems like he's just a distraction to town. Everything he says is irrelevant, even his defense of him being lynched. Overall, he seems scummier.

On August 20 2011 02:38 Nisani201 wrote:

Maybe you don't understand, but I understand perfectly. I have the PM's from DropBear, which is all I need.