|
I don't like the case on Coagulation, as it's basically just lynching the lurker. Coagulation is always completely useless on day 1, lynching him isn't bad, per se, it's just sort of ...derp. It's like lynching Kenpachi. The entire case is that he sucks.
I'd rather you guys took a look at Amber's posting. redFF is another one that is basically playing exactly like I'd expect him to as scum, posting mostly one-liners. His play this time looks similar to his AA play aside from randomly defending townies.
I'll be around for another 30 minutes, I think, but then I'm off for the night, so if you want to know anything specific syllo, make it quick.
|
Why is his crumbing scummy, and your crumbing ok Coag?
|
On August 07 2011 06:04 Amber[LighT] wrote:Show nested quote +On August 07 2011 05:57 syllogism wrote: I'm willing to believe Palmar's claim about genuinely being away. If he doesn't revert to his standard play on day 2, we'll lynch him. That leaves Amber and Coag for today. Amber, I find your non-meta reasons for voting palmar quite suspicious, especially this bit
"his pregame cult thing kinda got me nervous. It's a good cover up to hang backon later in the game.
What does that even mean? It seems like a good plan for late game to hide himself behind the fact that he was kidding with recruiting people via the thread. I don't really think this makes him scummy necessarily, it's just the first thing I noticed when his post quality declined from pre-game to the actual game.
So now you're retracting your FoS on me when it meets any kind of resistance? Best not stick your neck out?
|
First you call me scum based on my pre-game cult thing
On August 06 2011 10:45 Amber[LighT] wrote: I always find it fascinating to see how the pregame chat changes as soon as day starts. With that said I really think palmar is the best lynch candidate as of right now. His pregame cult thing kinda got me nervous. It's a good cover up to hang backon later in the game.
#vote: Palmar
And then you say it's not scummy.
On August 07 2011 06:04 Amber[LighT] wrote: It seems like a good plan for late game to hide himself behind the fact that he was kidding with recruiting people via the thread. I don't really think this makes him scummy necessarily, it's just the first thing I noticed when his post quality declined from pre-game to the actual game.
Awesome!
Oh if you actually don't think it's scummy (why the hell do you vote someone who you don't think is scummy?) Then your entire argument is "his activity changed", something I've already cleared up in the thread.
You should be lynched.
|
I'm off for the night (or at least few hours).
|
lol, fucking amber you scummy sucm imma hang your ass ++
gm towni isnt bad man we gto this. just dt chek syllo and protecth him, ifhes town we got this cause he is like the master of logic. fuckini phone typing
also, come at me mafia scum better kill me or im finding all you bastards and hang you lol, get ownedd :D
|
I may have been slightly (or highly) intoxicated when I wrote that last post, sorry.
|
Btw ignore what I said about checking syllo Varp, it's not a bad check as we've never seen his scumplay, but just do whatever you feel should be done with the card.
|
On August 08 2011 01:49 syllogism wrote:Show nested quote +On August 08 2011 01:45 kitaman27 wrote:On August 08 2011 01:31 redFF wrote: no it just sounds like role fishing. Cmon now. Think to yourself: What purpose would it serve me as scum to learn a single person who doesn't have an item. I already know several people who do have items, so if I was looking for a hit I would just kill one of them. If someone does come forward, they will likely be able to learn that my intentions were pro-town anyways. Palmar said his cabinet was empty, which probably means he has no item
This is correct.
|
On August 08 2011 05:27 Coagulation wrote:Show nested quote +On August 08 2011 01:20 Mig wrote:On August 08 2011 01:04 redFF wrote: In what way was Coags day 1 play scummy? He voted for trotske. Disappears gives no reasons for the vote. When he is called out on it he appears to defend himself says trotske is the most scummy but lists no new reasons why. If Coag actually thought trotske was the scummiest there was plenty of evidence to push for his lynch, but he chose not to. So the reasons for that would either be A) coag is just lazy/useless town or B) he didn't actually want trotske lynched because he knew he was town and didn't want the backlash. Im getting sick and tired of repeating myself because you guys have reading comprehension issues. I explained TWICE why i voted him. You guys are just making up shit and sensationalizing NOTHINGNESS For the sake of Pushing Something ANYTHING to look pro town. I voted trotske cause of the stupid breadcrumbs he was oblivious about. I dont see anyone scummier. I noticed alot of people ignored the question tho and Its probably a good idea to keep an eye on them also. i dont have a case on him worth wasting towns time. Its a placeholder vote Its a fucking vote on the 1 person that gave me red flags with the crumb and shit. ITS A PRESSURE VOTE TO SEE HOW HE AND HIS SCUM BROS RESPOND. ITS AN ACTION TO GET INFORMATION TO BUILD A CASE. Im sorry but im not gonna make up fucking shit and try to get trotske lynched just because its "DAY1" OMG I NEED A CASE TO PUSH. Im not here to buy town cred. This is EXACTLY WHY I DO NOT PUSH CASES ON PEOPLE UNLESS SOLID EVIDENCE IS THERE On day 1.
Why you mad? Care to actually explain your terrible reason of "breadcrumbs he was oblivious about"?
I don't even know what that means, usually I'm fully aware of it when I'm breadcrumbing.
And then you breadcrumb your role too, which makes no sense to me, if you see it as good enough reason to think someone is scum. It wasn't a pressure vote, it was a terrible vote no matter if you're town or scum, because you didn't back it up with any reason. There is no such thing as pressure votes. You vote for people who are scum. Nothing more, nothing less.
You should be here to buy town cred, why the fuck would you not want to establish your innocence? Are you trying to sabotage town?
Shape up.
|
GG Everyone, nice to actually just play vanilla town for once, although getting shot was less nice.
On August 09 2011 07:59 DoctorHelvetica wrote:Survey What did you like most about the game? I loved the atmosphere it created, I really have almost nothing bad to say about this game. The roles were interesting, the puzzles are for obvious reasons very hard to balance, but still were very fun. The setup was good, I love the mafia mechanic of recruiting their team. All in all one of the better mafia games I've played. What did you like least about the game? Mafia shooting me If you could remove something from the real haunted game, what would it be? Nothing, I like the format If you could add something to the real haunted game, what would it be? Nothing really, the game was pretty great Do you think this game was imbalanced in favor of town or mafia? the game was basically an f11 setup, but perhaps a bit town favored. Town won on analysis though, so it's hard to say, mafia just didn't play very well.Were the puzzles too easy or too difficult? First one too easy, second one perhaps slightly to difficult. Remove like 1-2 layer of clues and you'd have had a perfect puzzle, also I'd like to agree with please keeping NSFW stuff out of our mafia gamesAdditional Comments: ♥
|
|
|
|
|