On August 10 2011 05:13 Lucidity wrote:
He wasn't trying to derail the vote. He said JeeJee was the better vote for the day and he voted JeeJee himself. Out of all the reasons to vote chaos you chose the worst one. Pretty cool. I guess scum have trouble seeing these things?

who do you think is scummier?

Sevryn

698 Posts

August 09 2011 20:34 GMT

#978

On August 10 2011 05:28 Lucidity wrote:
If you found chaos' analysis on Munk-E the scummiest post in the thread... Then you.

So your saying the only thing scummier than chaos' analysis is finding it scummy?

Sevryn

698 Posts

August 09 2011 20:49 GMT

#980

its not the analysis its that he did it while his scum buddy was being lynched what a great way to distract from jeejee. do you really not get it? and who do you think is scummier besides me for a real reason

Sevryn

698 Posts

August 09 2011 20:51 GMT

#981

On August 10 2011 05:43 Lucidity wrote:
There's nothing scummy about his analysis at all. If you found it so scummy that you're willing to vote for him because of it there's something wrong.

also did you not read curus case?

Sevryn

698 Posts

August 10 2011 18:45 GMT

#1024

On August 11 2011 02:26 Curu wrote:
Hey Sevyrn who do you think we should lynch now?

I have had a bad feeling about BC for a while but its nothing concrete. He might have been lying about begin roleblocked but other than that maybe draz? maybe syllo? there are a few good choices

Sevryn

698 Posts

August 10 2011 19:39 GMT

#1027

I've been trying to look at BC since before mig died. I wanted to ask him whether he thought BC could have lied to him about being a vet. I think if we go after BC and if hes a vet like he claims then we go after syllo. after that I don't like lucidity but mostly because he didn't understand why i voted for chaos. Actually when I look at it lucidity was defending Chaos a good bit maybe we should look at him more. I'll make a case against lucidity here in a while.

Sevryn

698 Posts

August 10 2011 19:44 GMT

#1029

Ugh looking at lucidity's posts atm and he just looks like he didn't believe chaos was scum but The way he was posting at the night post makes him look either really retarded scum going down with the ship or just very misguided townie.

Sevryn

698 Posts

August 10 2011 19:44 GMT

#1030

On August 11 2011 04:41 Curu wrote:
Why syllo before the other Vets? Lucidity and DrH fall into the Vet category as well.

He has less posts than me

Sevryn

698 Posts

August 11 2011 20:58 GMT

#1070

Okay so we either have two confirmed townies or a lying town and the other is scum. Kenpachi and BC have both claimed to be role blocked. so they are both town. or one is lying and the other is retarded. personally i think they are both town because with this many vets it makes sense for the setup to have 2 RB with this many vets.

Sevryn

698 Posts

August 11 2011 21:07 GMT

#1072

*goo oozes out*

Sevryn

698 Posts

August 11 2011 23:39 GMT

#1076

we have less than 24 hours left to kill someone i think we should wait for 48 hours and not hammer someone so we can get modkills.
Since I am pretty sure BC and kenpachi are town im going to say lucidity is scum because of how anti chaos lynch he was.
##vote lucid

Sevryn

698 Posts

August 12 2011 00:11 GMT

#1077

sigh I'm retarded

Sevryn

698 Posts

August 12 2011 00:29 GMT

#1078

[20:07] <Lucidity> do you realise that BC was the one who tried to move the lynch from chaos?
[20:07] <sevryn> except im like 90% sure hes town
[20:08] <sevryn> why would two people lie about being roleblocked when one obviously isn't scum
[20:08] <Lucidity> scum can choose not to RB
[20:08] <Lucidity> and then claim they were..
[20:09] <sevryn> well fuck
[20:09] <sevryn> okay im retarded time to go back to the drawing board
[20:11] <sevryn> can you still explain your reasoning as to why you thought chaos wasnt scum?
[20:12] <sevryn> and post it in the thread please so we get some activity in there
[20:19] <Lucidity> i never thought he wasn't scum
[20:19] <Lucidity> the reason you posted for voting for him wasn't scummy though
[20:19] <Lucidity> he voted for jeejee
[20:19] <Lucidity> it was over
[20:20] <Lucidity> so he just presented another case for the following day so long
[20:23] <sevryn> what an easy way for scum to say they arn't trying to distract from the lynch when they present an alternative case. distracting from the lynch
[20:24] <sevryn> sure its not as good of a derail but it makes him look alot less scummy when his buddy flips red
[20:24] <sevryn> if he had hard protected him he would have been lynched anyway
[20:24] <Lucidity> I don't agree that it was a distraction
[20:25] <Lucidity> but chaos is dead so it doesn't matter ;p
[20:25] <Lucidity> bedtimez
[20:25] <Lucidity> gnite

Lucidity posts a valid point about how even if there is a roleblocker they can just not roleblock and claim to have been makes my preivous two confirmed townie plan not work.
however The fact that he doesnt see how chaos was soft protecting JeeJee makes me think he is either scum or just poor townie play also with his claimed vet i think he is still the best lynch candidate.

Sevryn

698 Posts

August 12 2011 20:28 GMT

#1133

On August 13 2011 05:09 Hesmyrr wrote:
@Ace: I guess that makes sense. All-scum-rush-gambit seems risky at first but I guess WIFOM nullifies most of the dangers away. I am probably biased by mafiascum rules I got used to in the past.

Show nested quote +

Isn't no lynching (unless it is filled with PR roles) always bad for town?
In 7-2 vanilla scenario you can win even if you make two mislynches but if you screw up and miss day 1 lynch, it'll be 6-2 by day 2 which mean you will lose if you make more than one mislynch.

I should probably start having more faith in the players I guess. I do see that unlike my concerns town seem to lynch people just fine even in majority lynches.

Edit:

Show nested quote +

It's not like 2~3 individual do not have great influence on the majority voting either. I guess you mean majority lynch forces numerous groups to consolidate into a major voting bloc which is a good thing. I actually have not thought about implications of that before. Thanks, will try it out in my next mini game.

No lynching can be usefull
if there are 4 players left and there is one mafia(obv) if you no lynch and the mafia hits someone you can take a 3v1 to a 2v1 increasing the chance you have to hit scum.

Prev 1 2 3 All

Please or register to reply.

Live Events Refresh