Perhaps at their own discretion...obviously dt checks would be wasted on lurkers, so maybe look at their VERY few posts and try and divine the most likely-to-be-mafia lurkers? Or maybe we come to a consensus as a town as to which lurkers to target?

Lurker KP is going to be COOL!

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

June 28 2011 04:59 GMT

#213

I see both sides of making lists. The discussion it generates is a definite plus for town, if it's focused the right way. YM, you referenced the Zodiac List from XLII...what you didn't take into account was that after he posted the Zodiac List, BC didn't guide the discussion after it...making it bad for town. He used the fact that no one uses the list properly to his advantage. Had he been town, he likely would have guided discussion properly, and it likely would have been more of a help for town.

There are a lot of likelies in that statement, and I'm well aware of it, tyvm. That's just my opinion.

Conversely, when abused, the Zodiac Lists DO tend to clutter up the thread.

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

June 28 2011 05:36 GMT

#220

I enjoy how GMarshal included Palmar on the Vet list, yet his first game was my first game as well. Yes, he had a strong showing for Mafia that game...but in all honesty, scum won from an inactive town. I wonder what motivation GMarshal has putting a new player like Palmar (if you'd like to see an example of his 'stellar town play', may I direct you to PTP?) in the 'Vet' side of that list. He's certainly no vet as far as I'm concerned.

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

June 28 2011 05:54 GMT

#229

On June 28 2011 14:42 GMarshal wrote:

Show nested quote +

I thought he played well, is that going to be a point of contention?

Sure he fucked up in PTP, but he *did* nail me when I was happily leading the town to do my bidding. In fact without him being resurrected the town would have assuredly lost. Your opinions are your own, I made some opinionated calls on that list, which I am more than happy to defend.

Fun fact, scum want to *avoid* being in the vet section of that list, as thats where the pressure is going to be when the vets start dying. Much like DB begged to be taken off the zodiac list in PTP, any mafia up there are now going to start second guessing their shots, as they don't want to expose themselves.

GM, the whole idea of you making a list like that is to discuss it. I'm not attacking you, so there isn't anything to defend. I disagreed with your choice and I made my opinion known.

If you're gonna step up to bat, be ready to swing sir...that's all I'm sayin. If we as a town are going to follow you (don't you even pretend you're not bucking for town leadership at this point

), I for one want to make absolutely sure there's no ulterior motive behind the things you say. Call me paranoid, but I trusted BC in PTP and it bit me in the ass...in a big way.

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

June 28 2011 05:55 GMT

#231

EBWODP
in XLII...it's pretty obvious I didn't trust him in PTP LMAO

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

June 28 2011 06:23 GMT

#240

@GM

At any rate, 201 is correct, Palmar DID /out before the game started. He'll either be Mod-killed or replaced before Day 2, I totally forgot.

Aside from adding LSB to the vet list, which Wiggles already suggested, I have no problems with your list. :D

NOW

What do we do with it? We've pretty much unanimously decided that blues will be acting on their own with VERY limited guidance from the rest of town. Should we just go down the list and start asking people their opinions on each one? Or is that just something to look at once people start dying?

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

June 28 2011 06:42 GMT

#244

:O

I go to do research to answer GM's question and I come back to this?!?! Real Time is going to be INSANITY.

Vaccuous and fluffy. I think 201 is leading there with the 8-10 (exaggeration, but just barely) posts concerning his name. Yes, we get it. They're not the same people.

I was also going to say LSB for talking about a plan to put people on the lurker list and then not following through...but....

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

June 28 2011 07:06 GMT

#253

I almost said something about that GM, as you seem like the type to diversify your vocabulary.

Who do YOU feel is disrupting town so far?

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

June 28 2011 07:20 GMT

#257

@Sandroba

GM fully admits to subscribing to a controversial stance that he'll catch flack for. Don't you think he'd be toning it down a bit on the lurker-hunt if he were scum?

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

June 28 2011 07:24 GMT

#260

I mean, the thing is he's right in theory. They have to trade in their 1 DT check for their 2 lurker checks unless I'm mistaken. That's 1 less DT check town has in its arsenal, right?

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

June 28 2011 16:15 GMT

#331

Only 4 pages in 8 hours...not bad guys, but it seems we're caught up in a lot of mudslinging and tunneling, something I thought we as a town vowed not to do d1.

Yes, we have to find a lynch target for today...but come on guys. Bring a case with SUBSTANCE.

I know, I haven't done much in the way of scumhunting yet. You don't have to remind me. I'm working on a case as we speak. Just letting you know I'm awake and reading.

Ciao!

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

June 28 2011 23:38 GMT

#470

It appears the main topic of discussion here is Dazek vs. Syllogism. In the name of keeping discussion down to a few candidates, I'm going to go ahead and read back through these two individuals' posts. Stay tuned!

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

June 29 2011 00:03 GMT

#474

I fail to see how you flipping green will prove ANYTHING about GM. You could just as easily be wrong about GM. However, if you flip RED, it's unlikely that GM is town...but I wouldn't lynch him based on that alone.

Dealing in absolutes is very scummy to me. Just sayin.

Back to reading. -.-