|
Let me preface this post by saying Kurumi is my favourite for the post with the Hello Kitty picture. <3
On July 01 2011 01:19 chaos13 wrote:Show nested quote +On July 01 2011 00:37 GMarshal wrote:
I approve. However I would have liked for that bullet to have hit me instead. Why, because you're just a goon? Even if you are a veteran and taking a hit would confirm you, it's better to kill a mafia than confirm a townie. You're not making any sense to me GM. You're playing a more pro-town game than almost anyone, and yet every now and then you post something like this that just doesn't make sense. However, I doubt a mafia would call a vigi shot to them.
I agree with chaos13 here. GM's play is making my head spin because of this play of his. I don't think he should have said anything and should have waited until a vig hit, and then possibly said something? I don't know, but I know I don't like what he's done here. And I don't like how he's constantly talking about it. It feels really damn wifom-y to me.
I'm not going to give a list of people I think should be vigged or protected. Those who should be protected are probably obvious.
I have this crazy sensation that sinasi206 or however you spell it is scum. I will have to reread him in isolation though.
|
Okay, changed my mind. I'll wait to see how supersoft plays.
On July 01 2011 03:33 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 01 2011 03:23 Lanaia wrote:Let me preface this post by saying Kurumi is my favourite for the post with the Hello Kitty picture. <3 On July 01 2011 01:19 chaos13 wrote:On July 01 2011 00:37 GMarshal wrote:
I approve. However I would have liked for that bullet to have hit me instead. Why, because you're just a goon? Even if you are a veteran and taking a hit would confirm you, it's better to kill a mafia than confirm a townie. You're not making any sense to me GM. You're playing a more pro-town game than almost anyone, and yet every now and then you post something like this that just doesn't make sense. However, I doubt a mafia would call a vigi shot to them. I agree with chaos13 here. GM's play is making my head spin because of this play of his. I don't think he should have said anything and should have waited until a vig hit, and then possibly said something? I don't know, but I know I don't like what he's done here. And I don't like how he's constantly talking about it. It feels really damn wifom-y to me. I'm not going to give a list of people I think should be vigged or protected. Those who should be protected are probably obvious. I have this crazy sensation that sinasi206 or however you spell it is scum. I will have to reread him in isolation though. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=10062251I don't care if he's acted pro-town. GM is way too good at this game to do what I described in this short analysis.
I never said I still think he's town.
I read your post and I agree with it. Especially the toe-dipping analogy. I feel it really fits.
As you've said, I also think he should be shot, but it really bothers me that he's actively seeking it out. If he isn't shot today, I'll probably vote for him.
|
On July 01 2011 05:37 Varpulis wrote:I've got some issues with Lanaia's posting. It's quite apologetic, and he is constantly making excuses in case somebody has a problem with his posts. + Show Spoiler + On June 28 2011 13:01 Lanaia wrote:Show nested quote +On June 28 2011 12:24 chaos13 wrote:On June 28 2011 12:20 youngminii wrote:On June 28 2011 12:13 hiro protagonist wrote:
Sup town!
I am 100% behind Gmarshal about lurkers/trolls. that is all I have to say about that.
so everyone, lets get into it: towns lurker KP should be used once any lurker list is up. As such, I doubt very much that we will need to do a policy lynch on lurkers (which is something I almost always advocate).
Conversely: mafia, with the lurker mod on, will try and be spammy. Vigs, please,please,PLEASE, just shoot anyone that is cluttering up the thread with nonsense.
Do not do this, Vig you should be targeting who they feel is scum, not anyone that is spammy. First off, scum are not stupid, they won't be spamming up the thread for the sake of spamming the thread. Second, by saying "just shoot anyone that is cluttering up the thread with nonsense" in the thread will obviously signal scum to be very delicate and careful with their posting. FoS on you for this, it's a very flawed plan, everyone knows what a lurker is and what's not, if someone appears to be spammy and their playstyle lines up with scum then go ahead and shoot them but as soon as you start directing who the Vig should hit publically is when mafia get an advantage. Does that really warrant an FoS? Are you willing to vote to back that up right now? Things like this should be kept in mind and used as evidence later on in the day phase when you actually have enough information and evidence to confidently label someone as scum. What it seems like here is that you're pushing a scum agenda trying to create an anti-town atmosphere of paranoia and weakly based suspicion. It feels weird to have FoS' this early in the game. Is it really that possible to get a read on anyone at this stage in the game? I mean, maybe that's how you roll, even with people whose metas and playstyles you don't know. If I'm wrong, I'm sorry. It just seems strange that anyone can have a read they feel solid enough to place a FoS on at this stage in the game. On June 28 2011 13:07 Lanaia wrote:
I'm actually legitimately confused when it comes to strategies involving the lurker list. Logically, I cannot fathom how one would be possible without outing everything we want to have kept hidden. Personally, I think it isn't a good idea and I will probably not take part in that, given it occurs. I am not good at planning and having a group planned with me. (Especially not with people I have never played with before)
I find what RoL just posted very interesting. I am curious to see how this will work. On June 29 2011 04:12 Lanaia wrote:
All right, so sorry I've been away since last night. Today has been busier than expected.
The LSB kill doesn't entirely make sense to me, but I suppose yes, he was kind of obviously town.
<rest of post snipped>
On June 29 2011 05:02 Lanaia wrote:Show nested quote +On June 29 2011 05:01 Jackal58 wrote:On June 29 2011 04:12 Lanaia wrote:On June 29 2011 03:55 Kenpachi wrote:
sorry im at my friend's house. I'll go read the thread once i get home.
BTW, im Kenpachi and Im a Townie. What the hell Kenpachi? Why... WHY did you say that? I feel this probably wasn't in your best interests, sorry bud. However, you're actually town, so... And posts like these make the hair on the back of my neck stand up. Scum slip? I just meant that from what I've seen of his play, I feel he is town. I tend to say things in the definite and not in the possible. I'm sorry. On June 29 2011 13:28 Lanaia wrote:
Guys I really suck at posting in an aesthetically pleasing manner. I am very sorry for that. On June 30 2011 15:05 Lanaia wrote:
I'm really sorry for my lack of activity in the past few hours.
I promise you I will post in the morning. I've got the worst headache and my ears are all allergylike.
I'm not sure about forum games, but is scum likely to bus? He's explaining away things that nobody is asking him about (activity) and apologizing for mistakes with almost every other post. He's buddying up with pro-town players (wiggles, Palmar) and agreeing with them to try to appear more town himself. I'm not confident that he's scum, but i'm quite suspicious at this point.
I have a tendency to overapologize in real life as well.
Supersoft calling me cute (which I had managed to miss until I saw it quoted) feels weird to me. I'd like to be treated like anyone else.
Right now, it feels like maybe half the game is talking at a decent pace. Has RoL said what'll happen about Torqez?
Right now I'm rereading the thread. The most enthusiastic person is . In my experience, the most enthusiastic people tend to be scum. However, these people are still capable of lurking.
Also Torqez is/was probably scum.
It wasn't a scumslip when I said kenpachi was town. He just didn't seem scum!
Okay, GM is the most overly enthusiastic/excitable person in this thread. I am going to vote him because he is assbackwards and confusing the hell out of me. I don't see the town motivation.
|
On July 01 2011 09:02 Kenpachi wrote:Show nested quote +On July 01 2011 08:49 VisceraEyes wrote:I will NOT advocate a GM lynch. I know you guys think he's scum, and I can see all the reasons for it...but I just don't think he'd be going to all the trouble if he were scum. The circumstances behind him pulling SIMILAR moves in previous games were completely different. I honestly think that in spite of how silly his methods sound, he's got town's best interest at heart. Anyone who argues otherwise simply has a different opinion on what's the most important for town. In the meantime, I'm going to stick my vote on Kenpachi. He's A) on the lurker list. B) NOT contributing (see A), and C) coming in randomly with classics such as: On July 01 2011 07:29 Kenpachi wrote:
Im going to hop the bandwagon if you dont mind.
##vote GMarshal
why? I agree with what people are saying right now.
That is all. I agree with what people are saying right now. Interestingly enough, people are saying ALL KINDS of things. Which things do you agree with? Which things do you NOT agree with? What are your thoughts on 206/supersoft? Why so lurky bro? Come play with us! hahahaha
Kenpachi please contribute or don't bother posting one liners. "hahahaha" is never going to help us. Please stop lurking. It's kind of irritating. I mean, I know I'm not doing that well at being super-active, but I'm trying. This, what you're doing, isn't even trying.
|
It was fun while it lasted. Good luck town.
|
GG everyone. Didn't realize it was over.
I was a bit surprised by the bomb, but oh well!
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
