EPTPick Their Power Mafia - Page 2
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6789 Posts
| ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6789 Posts
On June 01 2011 12:39 VisceraEyes wrote: Okay, I've got a survey. 1) Which do you consider to be more scummy; Active Lurking or Thread Derailment? 2) During the night, who do you think is going to be a top-priority target for Mafia? 3) Given the opportunity to Bro-fist Palmar, would you do it? 4) Between GM, Node and BC, who do you think has the most town cred based on this thread alone? 5) Between GM, Node and BC, who do you think controls the opinions of others the most? 6) Between Palmar's frattiness and red's Masonry, who's role do you find the most interesting based on information you have now? 7) Assuming you had the entire town's ear and you know everyone would believe you, what do you want to say FIRST? If anyone doesn't feel comfortable answering my inane questions, feel free to ignore them. Everyone else, take note of who doesn't want to answer my inane questions. 1) thread derailment, bad townies are active lurkers, scum are derailers 2) Dropbear or node 3) absolutely not 4) Node 5) GM 6) Palmar's fratiness 7) read the thread all the way through before you make your next post. I actually like this test, when I get home I'll qoute this and explain everything. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6789 Posts
Anyway. Just read the thread again, I think tackster is scum and it's been reenforced by my read through. Tackster has been relatively inactive and there's a pretty good case against him out there. Any decent scum team would snag this, send a couple accusations his way, then just roll with the brand new bandwagon. The lynch would be a pretty smooth one with an almost unanimous vote. However what are we seeing instead, tackster is being defended and more significantly, there are alternative options for the lynch. Tackster is VERY inactive, if he's town there's almost no reason for anyone to stand up for him and it would be extremely easy for mafia to lurk their way through... but that's not what we're seeing. Regardless of how tackster flips though, we're learning a lot with this lynch. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6789 Posts
On June 01 2011 23:35 Kurumi wrote: According to my papers,it was Sandroba who started voting on Tack. I startedthe vote on tack iirc. tnkted, part of the reason (alibeit a relatively small part) of why I think tackster is scum is because there's been so much debate about the lynch. If tackster was town, it would be in the mafia's best interest just place some votes on the first person with a decent case againt them and start a bandwagon then kick back and chill. Instead, suddenly a lynch sandroba or tnkted movement sprang up. From what I've seen (and I've read the thread a lot) tackster is waay scummier then either sandroba or tnkted. The surest way to know you're lynching a townie is if there's no discussion. This day has been the opposite. And if that's too WIFOM for you then just check tacksters posts, | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6789 Posts
On June 02 2011 00:25 Mataza wrote: I don´t like that Meapak assumes that because tackster isn´t voted on in unison he has to be scum(that´s what it boils down to). fact: tnkted got voted on before tackster, so no, he the "tnkted train" didn´t suddenly come to life, it was there beforehand. "Sandro train" was started by a fricking dog. Of these 3 I would be most ok with losing tackster, as he is the least useful. What I would prefer is lynching someone like tnkted. if he speaks the truth its essentially a no lynch to vote him. No I genuinely think he's scum, look at his posts. The fact that there is so much debate also lends itself to this in my opinion. Also GM, get on your game man, I'm actually getting suspicious of you, I can always tell when you're town but I'm not getting that feel this game. Oh and would the people who think I'm scum at least tell me why so I can address your points. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6789 Posts
I wanna go back to the lynch real quick though, I'm convinced one of the three candidates (before the viseyes debacle) is scum. There's really no other reason why the votes should be that close. Now we all know who I think is scum (and the fact that he weasled out of the lynch only reenforces this thought). However I'll accept the possibility that I'm wrong enough to say that all the top lynch nominees would be really good dt checks tonight. Another good dt check would be prplhz. Medics would do well protecting dropbear and node. Vigis should hold their fire, we've got so much useless finger pointing going on right now it really muddied the waters for the scum to hide beneath bad town play. Real quick I wanna say I'll be gone all day tomorrow but I'll have my thoughts on the day by 11PM PST. Oh and Jackal I feel your pain, I know your play enough to say I have a fairly town read on you atm. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6789 Posts
It makes it a crapshoot whether bum actually blocks in a pro town way. The mafia will just wait till the last second to send in their kills. It means town KP has to scrape close to the deadline as well, running the risk that it doesn't get counted (same for scum there's a team of them who can send in kills, townies are on their own so it's harder). All in all the drawbacks outweigh the benefits. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6789 Posts
On June 02 2011 14:38 sinani206 wrote: Wait, so you're saying it's good that he can save Mafia? Yeah Not only that he blocks town KP if it's first. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6789 Posts
I guess we're saying the same thing. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6789 Posts
I think people need to stop fistbumping palmar unless he says he'll use his power exactly as the town tells them. In fact the same goes for all claimed vigi type roles. Vigi is an easy role for mafia to fake and we've currently got a plethora of them, chances are at least one is scum so if we hold them accountable to the town that will be great for us. Anyway these are my thoughts on how things went down, tomorrow I'll be a lot more active and I plan on looking at the dead people and the viseyes vote (still haven't had a chance to do that yet  ) | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6789 Posts
lol not bum who wants us to shoot sinani, BC. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6789 Posts
| ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6789 Posts
| ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6789 Posts
Before everone hates on me for creating such a strong scum role lemme explain my rational of a self confirming role. Basically heres what I was thinking. I know who Torte roleblocks so if I see someone get roleblocked and not claim I become suspicious. Also, if a scum dies who Torte roleblocked I know Torte is town. Conversly, if Torte is killed and flips scum, I know everyone who got roleblocked is town. Right now here's what I think we should do. Rather than having you trigger-happy morons blow Torte away let's have someone check him first. If he's red then pow pow, we just killed a scum and confirmed a shitload of townies. If he's town then we continue on as before with Tortes power affecting both scum and Town. The reason I'm hesitant about killing Torte is this, the people he's roleblocked have been pretty scummy in my eyes, plus there are people who have been roleblocked but not claimed (I think). All this says to me that Torte is town. How someone figured out he visited GM is beyond me but what I do know is that GM wasn't the only one. I know who's gonna get roleblocked tonight but I'm not gonna say, I don't feel like revealing anything more about Tortes role. Oh and @Torte, your posting restrictions only applies during the day, you're fine right now. If you don't beleive me just ask BB, I told him to make sure you knew that's how your role worked. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6789 Posts
| ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6789 Posts
| ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6789 Posts
| ||
| ||
![[image loading]](http://www.fanserviceftw.com/gallery/_images/b936d6d6247faccc87e36d805ef60282/3879%20-%20animated_gif%20chuck_norris%20dodgeball%20thumbs_up.gif)
