|
On May 09 2011 07:36 Varpulis wrote: How many modkills are we looking at today? I have a feeling that this game could get very small, very fast. Right now? 10 possible modkills...
|
On May 09 2011 07:37 Forumite wrote:Show nested quote +On May 09 2011 07:36 Varpulis wrote: How many modkills are we looking at today? I have a feeling that this game could get very small, very fast. Right now? 10 possible modkills... 9 now, since MIg voted.
|
On May 09 2011 07:43 Forumite wrote:Show nested quote +On May 09 2011 07:37 Forumite wrote:On May 09 2011 07:36 Varpulis wrote: How many modkills are we looking at today? I have a feeling that this game could get very small, very fast. Right now? 10 possible modkills... 9 now, since MIg voted. Looks like the stealthvotes are coming in.
|
Good one chaoser, with 2 scum down from the modkill and successfull lynch, we´re finally getting somewhere. Although I´m angry at Lyter and beneather, if you have such an important role, you don´t screw town over by forgetting to post once for three days. Town is down 3 killroles, two of them because the players lurked too hard. At least the modkill took a scum too.
. . . . . Town:Scum Day 1 . - 24:6 Night 1 - 20:6 Day 2 . - 17:4 Night 2 - 15:4 - projected
|
Mafia killpower isn´t linked to their roles, but their number, so I´d say no, but waiting for host to answer.
|
On May 09 2011 18:05 DropBear wrote: EBWOP: Conversely, if roleblocking one of their own players costs a KP, then GGQ is cleared as telling the truth because 3 people died night 1. Wether or not roleblocking costs a KP doesn´t matter. GGQ can still be Mafia if GGQ lied about being roleblocked.
This is WIFOM, and doesn´t give anything.
|
On May 09 2011 18:45 DropBear wrote: Actually Node, one more question. Can the roleblocker block themselves or can they only block other mafia goons and the godfather? Again, no point. Roleblocking themselves and withholding the roleblock is the same thing. Roleblockers don´t have to use their ability every night.
|
What happened to kevconsim? He replaced Rising_Phoenix but didn´t vote this day either. Shouldn´t he be modkilled too?
|
On May 09 2011 18:55 Forumite wrote: What happened to kevconsim? He replaced Rising_Phoenix but didn´t vote this day either. Shouldn´t he be modkilled too? Nevermind, he was replaced by Beneather who got himself modkilled. *facepalm*
|
On May 09 2011 18:56 Forumite wrote:Show nested quote +On May 09 2011 18:55 Forumite wrote: What happened to kevconsim? He replaced Rising_Phoenix but didn´t vote this day either. Shouldn´t he be modkilled too? Nevermind, he was replaced by Beneather who got himself modkilled. *facepalm* Actually, it´s still relevant.
The player list says Beneather was modkilled as Day vigi #30, but also took over #23 after Rising_Phoenix and kevconsim. What happened to #23? is it modkilled too?
|
On May 09 2011 19:25 Node wrote: Kevconsim was not modkilled because he requested a replacement with advance notice and had a damn good reason for not being around. For some reason I confused Beneather with Impervious and mixed them up on the player list. For the record, Impervious replaced kevconsim who replaced Rising_Phoenix. I know kevconsim had a good reason, but his role could still be removed.
Got it, Impervious, took over right after the Day2 post, and posted two short posts.
|
On May 09 2011 20:05 Impervious wrote: Yea, it was pretty late at night for me, so I didn't say much more than "hi". I don't have anything to add to the discussion yet, but I am keeping up with everything. What is your opinion on the current players? Thoughts on the most popular scums?
|
On May 10 2011 04:39 Kurumi wrote:shut up foo' ghosts don't exist + Show Spoiler +I am joking(I didn't mean to be aggressive by any means) Ah! A Ghost!
|
On May 10 2011 05:53 Varpulis wrote:Chaoser's list seems solid, assuming it is - Sinani
- GGQ
- Eternal
- TBD (don't have a strong read on a 4th, possibly Forumite)
I was looking through the list of players, trying to find TBD, until I remembered the acronym. 
Also, I´m not scum.
|
Wow, chaoser is good. Kudos to him.
On May 10 2011 11:47 orgolove wrote: This is in progress - I'm posting this just in case I'm killed in the night (though not likely)
[url blocked]
The excel file contains the vote time and target for the past 2 days. It's quite interesting. I'll post a full analysis after day breaks and I have a few more identifiers. Waiting for your analysis.
|
The simple fact that Cthsazsa was a strong lynchtarget the last turn, but show up as -17 (!) in the graph, tells us that this technique is unreliable at best.
|
Orgolove, could you throw up the calculations that resulted in those numbers for the following players? Jaminz, MIg, Orgolove and Cthsazsa.
I just want to know why they come so far down.
|
Why does redtooth go from -9,5 in the first list, to 2 in the next, just by removing the changes after the DT-claim?
|
On May 10 2011 17:27 orgolove wrote: 10 out of those 17 comes from the fact that he came second to a red lynch, and all the high red-value players were willing to vote on him and see him through before the votes turned against them...
It's not like Amber was the godfather or even the roleblocker. Amber was just a mafia goon, and the reds were willing to lynch Cthsazsa over Amber...
I think I can be very sure that Cthsazsa is town aligned. Why do you take away 10p for something like that? There is nothing stopping Mafia from voting on eachother, in fact I think they do it all the time to throw us off.
Anyway I´d like the whole total, not just where those 10 come from.
|
On May 10 2011 18:06 orgolove wrote: Ah. I just saw your post.
Actually, from my records your votes were:
Day 2 player voted for 7-May 12:30 dropbear redtooth 8-May 14:20 dropbear orgolove 9-May 1:12 dropbear sandroba 9-May 11:15 dropbear cthsazsa 9-May 11:24 dropbear Amber[light] Where does the other points on Dropbear come from?
|
|
|
|