EPTSleeper Cell Mafia - Page 4
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On April 30 2011 11:32 GGQ wrote: Read over Zorkmid's posts on day1, they seem consistent with a dt to me. which posts? point them out | ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
 @bum: *yawn* | ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On April 30 2011 12:46 bumatlarge wrote: Ugh you guys get a nice majority on me and now you're getting squeamish? Throw your testicles back on your groins please. stop your QQing. Waiting for this guillotine to drop in silence is much appreciated. | ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
But my analysis has Impervious as more than suspicious. Believing bumatlarge with to be a detective with bum's ridiculous claim seems to me as someone who already knew bum wasn't Scum. I would have given him the benefit of the doubt if bum had a guilty result - but he believed him too readily for someone with a null result. | ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
Not sure about darm just yet. I'll get to it when I wake up in the morning though. | ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
Last night I shot GGQ and I know my bullet went through because I didn't get a message saying my hit failed. | ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On May 01 2011 13:19 Mr. Wiggles wrote: Then why does the day post say that the sleeper agents shot one of their own? If you were the head of the FBI and had an undercover agent on the inside would you tell the press? | ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On May 02 2011 02:04 Jackal58 wrote: I don't think I'm buying this either. If a vig shot last night why would they shoot GGQ or you? I'm the one with a great big fucking target on my back. um...what target? Anyway I was going to shoot Impervious last night but switched to GGQ. 2 things that stood out to me: 1.) Asking about darmousseh. There are a couple of lurkers this game and he was the third person to ask about this specific lurker. 2.) My message intercepts As an undercover agent I intercepted parts of 2 messages so far: "watch the Canadian" "likes men's magazine" The first had something to do with either Impervious or Mr.Wiggles and I chose Impervious. The second I figured pointed to GGQ 3.) When GGQ asked me my opinion of Wiggles analysis on Impervious that was my gut shot. For someone barely in the thick of things all game he chose an opportune time to get involved. On May 01 2011 21:25 Jackal58 wrote: So you're claiming to be some sort of double agent with a gun??? Wtf kind of claim is that? And if it's true why the fuck would you claim that? That makes less sense than bum claiming DT so early.(wtf bum  )You seriously want us to believe you are vigi/sooper spy? Day 1 you call me scummiest player in the game. Day 2 you tear bum a new one and lead the charge on his lynch after he calls me scum. Yet according to you I'm the scummiest player in the game. Day 3 you claim vig/sooper spy. Day 3 I call bullshit. If you are on the "inside" as you say you're actions make no sense what so ever. You push the DT lynch over who you believe to be the scummiest player. If you are on the inside this just doesn't add up. You would have known bum and I were both town and pushed for a 3rd party for the lynch. Not one of us. I'm not buying it. If you have some sort of role that allows you to get info on the scum team and shoot them why would you claim it???? I'm an undercover Agent with 1 shot and get parts intercepted messages from the CL. So I have no more shots anyway and I'm pretty sure we're close to winning this especially seeing how panicked you are. If you are a townie you should be glad I chose correctly because if I missed I'd be automatically killed also. Something tells me you aren't though. | ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On May 02 2011 02:36 Impervious wrote: Lol, so that's why you're suspicious of me? Well thats not all of it. When you believed bum's claim so easily without a guilty result I found that ridiculous. If a detective pops up on Day 2 and says "player X is surely innocent!" does that sound believable? | ||
| ||
