EPTSengoku Mafia - Page 15
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
BrownBear
United States6894 Posts
| ||
|
ghrur
United States3786 Posts
On November 14 2010 09:54 annul wrote: so your logic is dont attack because ... "if you attack, you may get more votes, and if you get more votes, its bad for town (?????????)" If you attack, you may eliminate other people. If you eliminate other people, there are less people in the game. If there are less people in the game, Mafia has to convince less people to vote toward a townie to get them lynched. If Mafia has to convince less people, it's easier to start a bandwagon. Both of the last 2 if->then statements are bad for town. | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
also, you could attack and take out mafia too, right? i think you assume attacking will always take out town when it can also take out mafia. if town attacks town, town does not lose any votes, it is only concentrated in a smaller number of PLAYERS. this is not inherently bad. | ||
|
kingjames01
Canada1603 Posts
Hurry Coagulation!! =) | ||
|
jcarlsoniv
United States27922 Posts
Wait too long and I'll assume you're hiding things from us! =P | ||
|
ghrur
United States3786 Posts
On November 14 2010 11:52 annul wrote: only if you assume that the town will be making bad decisions and/or following mafia bandwagons. also, you could attack and take out mafia too, right? i think you assume attacking will always take out town when it can also take out mafia. if town attacks town, town does not lose any votes, it is only concentrated in a smaller number of PLAYERS. this is not inherently bad. From my experience here at TL Mafia, town usually DOES make bad decisions and they DO follow the mafia bandwagon. But that's not even the problem. The problem is that if you start eliminating fellow townies and gaining more votes, each individual person has more weight. It becomes kind of like a lylo situation where if Mafia convinces one person, town loses. I mean, I doubt it'll get that extreme, but it heads towards that anyway. And attacking and taking out mafia has a lower probability of happening than attacking and taking out town. I'd rather we secure the neutral territories, CLAIM if you're the nation that secured a neutral territory, and then defend to see where mafia gets aggressive. This way, we can scrutinize the players with more influence and we can try and we can narrow down who is mafia. Of course, the problem as always is mafia fake claiming as a nation that took a neutral territory, but then they'll just be watched more closely. If they took one over and didn't claim, we, as town, can then be aggressive toward that nation. If they took one over and claim, once again, heavy scrutiny falls upon them. Also, votes concentrated in smaller numbers is usually bad. That's why lylo situations aren't good, because you depend on one person. Furthermore, we have no way of telling which side the votes are being concentrated in. Edit: FoS on Brownbear. No explanation of why he voted Veldril... at all. | ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
On November 14 2010 12:17 Ace wrote: Also, is PMing allowed? Editing also? This better be true (PMing). Or else I just cheated with everyone in the game. | ||
|
Lexpar
1813 Posts
| ||
|
jcarlsoniv
United States27922 Posts
I feel like most people at this point have PMd, so the game is screwed if it's not allowed. | ||
|
Hesmyrr
Canada5776 Posts
| ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
On November 14 2010 09:22 Chezinu wrote: Can everyone pm me their roles and/or province? I would really like that since I'm a good guy. Note: If we take over all of the neutral land then the communist will become vulnerable. What if scenario: What if the mafia has Missionary as special role? 1. Communist is anti-town 2. If mafia has a Missionary it would be wayyyy OP | ||
|
Caller
Poland8075 Posts
| ||
|
Coagulation
United States9633 Posts
![[image loading]](http://imgur.com/lQf9j.png) | ||
|
jcarlsoniv
United States27922 Posts
| ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
And 25 is not a neutral territory? X.X | ||
|
Coagulation
United States9633 Posts
looks like 18 / 14 / 9 / 7 / 3 are up for grabs waiting for caller to confirm. | ||
|
Coagulation
United States9633 Posts
so i assumed he wanted it in there. maybe there was a last minute change. | ||
|
Beneather
Canada451 Posts
| ||
| ||
