Insane Mafia - Page 12

On November 10 2010 02:45 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote:
lol I think its a logical assumption that there is a godfather in this game. There is a bunch of power roles, I would imagine getting a bunch of power roles for mafia involved a godfather, and no that is not the only argument against pandain. Do I seriously have to do an analysis on him? Is everyone's recall that bad?

The argument against pandain is typical mafia aggression, convenient lynches yesterday and chaos that caused him to live and two innocent people to get lynched. When hunting for mafia you don't just look at the behavior as one, you have to assume the town is getting manipulated and see who that manipulation benefited the most, especially on a double lynch that dodged all mafia deaths on day 4.

Pandain has continued his aggression and was supported by coagulation while double attacking DrH. A strong mafia tell is defending your partner by attacking his attacker, its the same shit. He is just hiding behind a facade of being a half useful detective role which magically has not turned up a mafia role yet, how I am not surprised?

If you seriously want to make me do it and explaining the above twice isn't enough to go off of I will do the analysis but it will take a lot of time that I don't think I need to spend on him.

On November 10 2010 06:10 youngminii wrote:
a lot of people ignored that fact because they were swayed by the mafia when they decided to support pandain with lots of 'reasoning'

KILL PANDAIN

On November 10 2010 05:32 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote:
Two claimed investigative roles in the game remaining is what I think you mean. We still have IS and Kitaman, but if you disagree that Kita could be considered an investigative role then you can't very well say yours is either. If you want to count that ends us with 4 supposed investigative roles that are public as of now, which is ignoring the possibility that someone in the game has a role and just hasn't claimed. You, Kita, KtheZ and IS are the ones who have claimed investigative roles, three of you remain.

I honestly have no idea how KtheZ got lynched to be honest. As far as my vote on Hyperbola goes, it seemed like a good lynch and I wasn't hear to see all the band wagoning and lack of resistance against it, or maybe I would of thought twice, however I doubt it. I also voted for you if you remember, and I blame the chaos of the day for letting you get off the hook. I was busy and didn't get to catch up until the day actually ended and here we are.

The thing is, if you think someone is scum you have to be open to the possibility that they are not as well, usually that doesn't lead to such an extreme level of aggression. Being overly aggressive like you have been is a clear mafia tell, and yes you can say you would pursue anyone to the ends of the earth but keep in mind I have played with you before and I know that is bullshit. In team melee mafia you posted a pretty good analysis but let the mafia team dismiss it and continue running the town. So saying that you are always aggressive when you believe someone is mafia is a load of shit. You attacked people multiple times this game with half an idea in your head and just continued ramming into a wall hoping to cause an effect, and in previous games when you actually put thought and time into something you don't even pressure your opinion and your thoughts, you just let yourself get ignored then killed the following night.

Does that really sound consistent with what you are saying?

On November 10 2010 06:40 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote:
So you wrote an analysis on someone because you didn't think they were scum?


you out yourself here. In those games you put real effort into proving someone was scum but were discouraged away from it, now in this game you are scum and you attack people and you are claiming you are MORE convinced in this game that those you accused of scum are/were scum which is how you justify attacking them without a second thought? It seems like you are admitting in your previous games that you applied more caution to your accusations while in this game you seem to haphazardly attacked people with unruly conviction.

The only reason you would be MORE relentless in a game then you are now is either a complete change in personality or a different role which is making you act differently. The choice seems obvious considering that was only 1-2 games ago. If you want to add further evidence on top of that you are MORE SURE in an insane mafia set up of someones role where everything is erratic and hectic then you were in a standard F11 set up where everything plays out normally. Do you see the issue here? You should be more confident in a game with more open information but instead you somehow are more confident in this game where the roles are crazy and people motivations can never be 100% sure until they flip.

On November 10 2010 08:02 infinitestory wrote:

for emphasis: WTF

On November 10 2010 08:17 Glasse wrote:


wat

On November 10 2010 08:38 LunarDestiny wrote:

Look at how Kitaman got bullied.

On November 10 2010 08:40 LunarDestiny wrote:

What proof? At that point, we don't want to reveal everything.

On November 10 2010 08:53 kitaman27 wrote:
Good luck town.

Watch out for Artanis[Xp]'s pro-mafia role names :p

On November 10 2010 08:55 Glasse wrote:


wait what role are you already?