well this kill was based more off clues, and then we went through with it for info. personally, i didn't expect anything, but we did get lucky i guess.

BM already admitted he's not going to be playing off clues.

seRapH

United States9776 Posts

October 13 2010 04:40 GMT

#1142

On October 13 2010 13:37 DoctorHelvetica wrote:

Divinek will replace CKSide.
ZaplinG will replace goldfishs
michaelthe will replace kitaman27
BrownBear will replace kuja900
RebirthOfLegend will replace mptj
Artanis[Xp] will replace Zeraghul.

oh fuck. this will probably change more than anything else ^_^

seRapH

United States9776 Posts

October 13 2010 04:43 GMT

#1149

On October 13 2010 13:41 aztrorisk wrote:
Doctor H, how much longer must you torture us?

until the night is over...?

seRapH

United States9776 Posts

October 13 2010 04:47 GMT

#1157

On October 13 2010 13:47 Bill Murray wrote:
dt is already checking you
sorry

probably shouldnt be encouraging framers

seRapH

United States9776 Posts

October 13 2010 04:58 GMT

#1171

shit just got real o.O

seRapH

United States9776 Posts

October 13 2010 12:50 GMT

#1291

Reapers- just dont do anything stupid please. Veldril is a possible target, sure, but do NOT hit pandain/BM's replacement/coag.

The number of blues that are newbies scares me.

seRapH

United States9776 Posts

October 13 2010 14:07 GMT

#1296

M/V will NOT know if Veldril is townie, or at least for sure, because he could be either townie OR the opposing side.

It is night, nothing we decide right now will change anything unless you're blue/red.

seRapH

United States9776 Posts

October 14 2010 02:14 GMT

#1397

On October 14 2010 11:12 Kpyolysis32 wrote:

Show nested quote +

Even lynching a veteran wouldn't be THAT bad, because he'll survive and then the boogeyman can watch him to see if anyone comes to kill him (I seriously doubt that vampires would use the brute just to kill a confirmed innocent and the boogeyman, especially if they continue to be short a man compared to mafia on that night, so boogeyman is probably safe doing this).

veterans die to lynches no matter what. they only survive hits.

seRapH

United States9776 Posts

October 14 2010 02:57 GMT

#1405

there was a bandwagon against me? o.O
news to me...
orgolove chill out a bit and look at your info objectively. what you're doing right now is getting an idea and looking for evidence, try it the other way around.

seRapH

United States9776 Posts

October 14 2010 03:05 GMT

#1411

On October 14 2010 12:03 orgolove wrote:
Lawl Tunnel Vision alert!

1. You claimed to be playing in a mafia game for the first time, and yet you use the mafia jargon of a seasoned veteran.
2.You roleclaimed as a zombie in the first day. Now, would someone who really is playing mafia, and an INTERNET mafia game, for the FIRST TIME IN THEIR LIFE, have over 70 posts before even the first day ends? In fact, considering that you claim that you have a "useless" role (you even said it yourself), I bet a real first-time mafia would find it extremely difficult to have any enthusiasm for the game. And yet here you are - 70 posts later, as a first time mafia participant and, as you claim, a zombie.

if taken out of context i may think you're accusing me. please gather some real evidence before you continue this assault.

or of course, you can take the easy way out and accuse me too.

seRapH

United States9776 Posts

October 14 2010 03:07 GMT

#1414

oh i noticed, i'm "defending" him here.

not really, i'm actually attacking your methods of accusation. if you dont want me to interfere then take it to the PMs.

seRapH

United States9776 Posts

October 14 2010 03:17 GMT

#1418

orgo, take a moment and really think about it.

you have 93 posts in this thread.
coag has 76

and is it really hard to learn jargon? i think you're still getting too hung up on the smurf thing. and imo, i think that people who post that much are MORE likely to be new than old, since the veterans will be faring better in PM land.

seRapH

United States9776 Posts

October 14 2010 03:29 GMT

#1426

On October 14 2010 12:20 jodogohoo wrote:
coagulation should die no matter what his role is. his posting in detrimental to the town.

if it were anyone else who said this then it might actually have held weight.

while you do not have as many posts as coagulation, you have been quite unhelpful, and I believe lynching you will help more than coag.

On October 14 2010 12:24 KhrisKruel wrote:
how someone plays a game is not a reason to vote for them, even if they're annoying. Any green/blue lynches are bad for the town.

Voting for information is stupid too.

sometimes stupid people have a strange charisma that causes crazy bandwagons. stupid townies can spark stupid townie civil wars and then the reds can just keep out while we kill each other. hooray.

seRapH

United States9776 Posts

October 14 2010 03:46 GMT

#1439

Orgo, I like how literally no one is supporting your accusations.

This tells me one of two things:
1) You're a really bad townie. You have spread discord and have completely diverted our attention from other matters. Your arguments so far mostly suck, and the only saving grace you have is your little spreadsheet magic, which as of yet has not been the source of much analysis.

2) You're scum. You intentionally spread discord and diverted our attention. You made arguments not so that they made sense and lead towards your fellow scummates, but towards those not on your team. You hope these empty contributions lead us to think of you as a fellow townie.

Which is more likely? Either way if you continue this style of posting I think it'll be a good idea to lynch you sooner or later.

seRapH

United States9776 Posts

October 14 2010 03:54 GMT

#1449

On October 14 2010 12:50 Kpyolysis32 wrote:

Show nested quote +

So? Why does that matter?
The way that I think it happened:
Seraph (and others?) voted coagulation based on his name and the clues
Coagulation responded sarcastically/jokingly
Seraph made the post saying he was going to keep his vote on coagulation due to said response, because sarcasm is not beneficial to the town
Notably later, coagulation brought up the vote in the post you quoted, and seraph's previously somewhat-reasonable justification seemed flimsy after candidates who were so much better has been presented, so he said the useless terrorist thing.

Although, that actually does seem pretty suspicious. tHe terrorist comment is very hypocritical considering the post I quoted, and the reason why seraph wouldn't just switch his vote away at that point is not apparent to me. I want to hear their reasoning for this.

-.-

have i not made it clear that i will have nothing to do with clues?
why i voted for coag: because if i didnt then my vote would be on nobody, which isnt productive. if i vote people then it goads them to respond, and i want responses to analyze.

why i didnt switch: we were in the middle of a discussion of which i wasn't sure what side i agreed with. if i switched then i may have had to switch many more times.

now lets look at it this way:
If i were scum, and coag was my scummate, then i would switch AS SOON as i find another candidate with qualifying suspicion. i would push to have this character lynched.