EPTdibs on hatter?
TL Mafia XXVII
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Vivi57
United States6599 Posts
dibs on hatter? | ||
|
Vivi57
United States6599 Posts
Also, is lynching an inactive really best? We've done that since forever and people are so used to the strategy that I don't think it'll give us as much in the way of vote lists and voting patterns to analyze. I say that we make everyone talk then analyze behavior and if someone appears scummy, we shouldn't insta go for the inactive. | ||
|
Vivi57
United States6599 Posts
We're going to have at most 1 vig, whether its day or night. There's no way we'll have a watcher, tracker, *and* dt. And I wouldn't be surprised if we had 0 hatters and 0 vets. | ||
|
Vivi57
United States6599 Posts
I am a townie | ||
|
Vivi57
United States6599 Posts
ludwig and tree hugger are probably legit. There are 1-2 mafia among the greens and 2-3 that still haven't claimed. The list of non claimers is an excellent place to start looking for scum. | ||
|
Vivi57
United States6599 Posts
On June 11 2010 01:53 ~OpZ~ wrote: I'm not sure. Usually I agree with the inactive lynch and more discussion, but as Radfield said, inactivity should not be a problem this game. Role claiming usually comes as a last resort? Why would we push for roleclaiming THIS early. It's pretty ridiculous if you ask me. I'd guess the mafia are planning privately right now. So they probably aren't posting too much. If we're serious about this role claiming, we're giving them a lot to decide. Who claims what, risk/reward type shit. But since we've had a dt claim we can use him to our advantage. So we must get his sanity established...Do we have him check somebody, and then lynch the person the next day? Just check and hope mafia kills the person? Maybe he's paranoid? Lots of problems come up from this. I dunno what the best course of action is, I'm not usually that good at coming up with plans for the town. =( That post as many pointed out does alot of speculating on what mafia are doing so immediately he was noted as probably mafia. At the point where all but 6 had claimed, I guessed 2-3 scum still hadn't claimed, opz on the list. Which made him the best suspect at the time. Also placed that vote incase I didn't get back to the thread before voting closed. | ||
|
Vivi57
United States6599 Posts
Now scum are really spread out in their claiming and the timings of them won't really have any impact on who's suspect. That destroys one of my biggest theories. I'm going to sleep, but I'll definitely reread the L-foolishness dialogue. | ||
|
Vivi57
United States6599 Posts
| ||
|
Vivi57
United States6599 Posts
So we know the first blue claimer is dead and was blue. The second is ludwig, a prime suspect. Then: On June 10 2010 17:38 LuDwig- wrote: I was wondering... Writing down here our roles is quite a dumb thing -___- I have played only one game and in that game the PM was not allowed (BANG BANG) so I supposed that also in this game PMs were not allowed.. But when i recived a PM 5 minutes ago i check the rules and O.O (<-my expression) So don't post your role on the thread but PM L! We have to decide if L can be trustable or not! If he is townie he can tell us how to move! But if he is mafia he will get tons of info about townie and their role! What to do? A more experienced player can tell me his thoughts? He wants us to *PM* L our roles rather than posting them. If that doesn't set off a million red flags, I don't know what does. going to continue ludwig's analysis, but given that we only have a few hours before night, I'm posting this here now. | ||
|
Vivi57
United States6599 Posts
On June 12 2010 03:01 LuDwig- wrote: haahah quite easy to claim Detective when we are sending not claiming people to a corner .__. How to discover who is lying? The plan is quite easy! [blueTracker checks this night me or moocow. If one of us is lying tracker will knows that we have visited nobody during the night! So we will know for sure who is lying  MooCow...i suppose you have not problem following this plan right? BRILLIANT. They set up a scenario where they're guarenteed the tracker kill (noone double claims as tracker) and use the tracker to verify ludwig. Based on his other posting, I also doubt he could think of that plan by himself (or he could and he's just playing dumb). yeah, I'm not doing a good job of objectively reading ludwig, but he seems visibly upset when citizen hits L, criticizing the shot. But yeah, my vote is on ludwig for sure | ||
|
Vivi57
United States6599 Posts
Also happy being the sole person voting for ~OpZ~ yesterday | ||
|
Vivi57
United States6599 Posts
| ||
|
Vivi57
United States6599 Posts
| ||
|
Vivi57
United States6599 Posts
| ||
|
Vivi57
United States6599 Posts
| ||
|
Vivi57
United States6599 Posts
otherwise, we'd probably have been sweeped | ||
|
Vivi57
United States6599 Posts
play so that we can't tell what he is so that when he's mafia, he can hide well. | ||
|
Vivi57
United States6599 Posts
On June 18 2010 16:01 Chezinu wrote: Btw, Who said that at most there were going to be 5 blue roles? That was a good call. On June 10 2010 14:18 Vivi57 wrote: What makes you think we only have 4 townies this round. You really think there's 7 blues? We're going to have at most 1 vig, whether its day or night. There's no way we'll have a watcher, tracker, *and* dt. And I wouldn't be surprised if we had 0 hatters and 0 vets. close enough? | ||
| ||
