Pick Your Power Mafia!
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Falcynn
United States3597 Posts
| ||
Falcynn
United States3597 Posts
| ||
Falcynn
United States3597 Posts
| ||
Falcynn
United States3597 Posts
| ||
Falcynn
United States3597 Posts
Also, maybe I'm not thinking straight right now, but I'm almost leaning towards setting up a townie to be lynched on the second day so we can tell all cops in this thread to investigate them. That way all the the cops will know fairly quickly what sanity they have. | ||
Falcynn
United States3597 Posts
| ||
Falcynn
United States3597 Posts
| ||
Falcynn
United States3597 Posts
On May 03 2010 05:11 JeeJee wrote: also note, so far in this thread, the following people have claimed they don't have a role: korynne - important role (not inv or rb) above him jonny - silly caller - silly falcynn - silly qatol - copy above him opz - comp vig above him i'm wondering why y'all revealed this info, but i imagine some of you are lying as docs or something which also sets up nice mindgames. if you're all telling the truth though then /facepalm While I was skimming through the thread I noticed this post On May 02 2010 08:32 Qatol wrote: *snip* The non-claimants are: L's replacement Falcynn ~Opz~ Amnesia Scamp and assumed somehow that Ace might've posted something revealing who hadn't claimed a role yet, so I was explaining why I didn't claim. Afterward I realized that Ace didn't mention anything about who claimed/who didn't, but I can't edit my post obviously so I just left it. Anyways, is my alignment cop idea really that bad and that's why no one's mentioned it? Or did everyone just miss it? | ||
Falcynn
United States3597 Posts
On May 03 2010 07:30 DarthThienAn wrote: Ah I see, guess I just suck at reading comprehension =/Also, we only have one cop who would need to figure out his sanity - the role cop and JOAT are auto-sane. So lynching someone to figure that out is bad imo. | ||
Falcynn
United States3597 Posts
On May 04 2010 21:08 Radfield wrote: 2b Falcynn wishy washily claimed VANILLA without actually doing it Alright, I guess I should clearly state, I'm a vanilla townie. I decided not to make mention of it since . Was preparing for/doing this on Friday/Saturday http://www.filmracing.com/Cities/sanfrancisco.htm and missed the role claims because of it. I'll make a blog of it Thursday night/Friday since we're not allowed to upload our video until after the screening (yeah, this is really more to just get attention for my future blog post then to actually explain myself ) Anyways, as for lynching sidesprang, you're logic seems pretty sound, I guess at this point with all the information that's been gathered, it'd be nice to make sure whether or not everyone at the top of the list has been telling the truth about their roles. If we can get a day vig hit then that might help, although I'm not sure if we'd be able to figure out another lynch target and pile the votes on them in time. It'd suck to essentially waste a day vig hit by not getting the lynch to add to it =/ | ||
Falcynn
United States3597 Posts
##vote sidesprang ## | ||
Falcynn
United States3597 Posts
| ||
Falcynn
United States3597 Posts
On May 05 2010 00:38 ~OpZ~ wrote: ##Vote Radfield ## I have a bad feeling about this guy.... So do I to an extent, but that's not really enough reason to lynch him, especially now. His plan actually makes sense, if we lynch sidesprang, we'll have some info on whether or not the people above him are telling the truth with their claims (and I'm sure that you guys are experienced enough to know the whole "lynch all liars" strategy). Lynching Radfield now doesn't do anything, it's not like we'll lower the mafia KP by getting him, and he's so far down the list that it's unlikely that he has a really powerful role. We have plenty of time to get people based on suspicions like this, but right now let's just work on getting information based on roles since that's the best lead we've been given. | ||
Falcynn
United States3597 Posts
| ||
Falcynn
United States3597 Posts
Pretty awesome second lynch. Gotta read back over the posts again, but does this mean that we can assume (for the moment anyways) that the people above him are probably telling the truth with their roles? | ||
Falcynn
United States3597 Posts
| ||
Falcynn
United States3597 Posts
I didn't read the thread before I put in my numbers, and I was preparing for the filmrace so I never bothered checking if the town was organizing someway of having people pick numbers. Sorry if my numbers turned out to be anti-town. | ||
Falcynn
United States3597 Posts
On May 06 2010 05:44 Qatol wrote: Well now that your brought that up, we'll know that excuse is probably bullshit, especially if he uses it more than once.Okay so what if he claims it went to someone who died but actually gives it to a mafia member? Nobody can dispute that. Anyways, I'm gonna have to agree with the suggestion posted a page/few pages back that the inventor at this point should focus more on inventions that'll protect the town/help the town gather information rather than inventions that will give us more KP. Once we have some really solid leads then getting extra lynches will be very beneficial, but considering that the inventions last only one night (I did read that correctly right?) and we don't have enough leads to justify having guns+CV+regular lynch in a single day, I think getting information should be our priority rather than getting extra kills. With enough information we can go after the mafia+SK relatively easily, but getting more kills will probably damage us since it forces us to follow fairly weak leads in order to have targets to be killed. | ||
Falcynn
United States3597 Posts
On May 06 2010 12:25 Zona wrote: I'm actually done with the contest, that was on Friday/Saturday, I was only using that reason for why I missed the role claims. My activity here is mostly due to the fact that I usually don't have much to contribute other than agreeing with others =/ In flamewheel's game (mafia XXII) I was criticized for not saying much and was told that even if all I do is agree with others, then at least say so as that appears less scummy and helps the town by knowing where the townies stand.Falcynn doesn't have many posts, and most of his statements are just questions about the game or agreement with plans others have posted. His excuse is that he's working on a film-making contest and thus is busy. The only interesting thing of note is his offer to sacrifice himself so that the alignment cop could use him to determine sanity, but nothing has come of that. So even though I usually don't have anything new to add to any discussions, I figured I should at least take the advice from last game and get involved with the discussions, even if all I do is agree with people. Anyways, I'm going to go ahead and just say (even if it makes me seem scummy) that I agree with lynching BM or calling for him to be CV'd if he makes some other obscure item that goes against what all the other townies have said. The gun that only kills mafia sounds like a great idea, but really, as long as BM invents something that shows he's at least listening to us rather than just taking things in his own hands would do a great deal to make him less suspicious. Right now, it seems BM is doing a good job (probably not intentionally, but that's beside the point) in dividing the town and distracting us. | ||
Falcynn
United States3597 Posts
On May 07 2010 02:21 Qatol wrote: We can just day vig/CV one of us and lynch the other. Although I'm actually not really sold on JeeJee, I'll try to get back in time to do my own analysis on him. Considering Qatol has struck me as suspicious a few times, I'm not just ready to take his word for it, but if other people share the same sentiment that it's very likely either JeeJee or I are lying then I wouldn't be too opposed to essentially a double lynch.I already checked the time stamps. The people who could have plausibly lied are JeeJee and Falcynn. Scamp technically could have, but he would need serious guts to have done so. That's why I think we are basically stuck with a coin flip between the two unless someone has a strong case to go for one over the other. | ||
| ||