EPT/in
World at War Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Fishball
Canada4788 Posts
/in | ||
|
Fishball
Canada4788 Posts
| ||
|
Fishball
Canada4788 Posts
| ||
|
Fishball
Canada4788 Posts
On March 24 2010 02:04 XeliN wrote: L being banned for 2 days in my eyes means he is not a viable candidate to be lynched, although the posts he has made already I disagree with but that might simply be because he's L and thats my general reaction to whatever he posts. As to the idea of retaliation against a player who has an itchy trigger finger, we have the perfect form of retaliation. We lynch them. Or to put it more bluntly Any player launching a nuke against another without at the very least providing coherent argument for doing so will be lynched. Furthermore the only instance whereby we would launch against a player who acts in this way would be if we already have a good candidate for lynching, then we will nuke or multiple nuke them (I am of the opinion that 2 ought to be enough) To get things started off in the voting section I am going to be Voting ~OpZ~ His post earlier on both seemed different in style to the way he posted in the last game and also was riddled with subtle "I am town" choice of wording, something I consciously made an effort to do in the last game I was mafia so guess I'll go along with my instinct here. To me, the tone OpZ used gives me the impression that he has the power to nuke. Doesn't feel scummy to me at this point of the game though. If you're Mafia, that would be a dumb way to get unwanted attention. | ||
|
Fishball
Canada4788 Posts
On March 24 2010 03:38 XeliN wrote: You disagree with my observation on ~OpZ~ fine, i made it clear it was mostly intuitive based on how I tried to act when I was mafia, you then coming out and making what is essentially a slight accusation without actually doing so concerns me more. If I was mafia then yes it might be unintelligent to bring attention to myself early in this way, that is obvious. What concerns me more is did you type that just to state something obvious or did you just want to write the word "mafia" about another player? You totally misread my post. I'm not talking about you at all. I said "IF you're mafia", you wouldn't want unnecessary attention, which is what OpZ did. | ||
|
Fishball
Canada4788 Posts
On March 24 2010 03:42 haster27 wrote: lol I hope this is not how the rest of the game is going to unfold. I already called this on page 8. We'll see what happens. | ||
|
Fishball
Canada4788 Posts
On March 24 2010 03:46 XeliN wrote: Oh lol, to be fair it can easily be interpreted both ways  I actually reread my post a couple times after you quoted me, as you didn't make much sense. If I was actually "accusing" you, then MY sentence wouldn't make sense at all. I still don't know how you interpreted the "other" way. Maybe something to hide  ?I actually just googled WIFOM as I've never heard of this term before. http://www.mafiascum.net/wiki/index.php?title=Wifom So you're saying I was playing the WIFOM game or Xelin? If you meant me, then no. | ||
|
Fishball
Canada4788 Posts
On March 24 2010 03:59 XeliN wrote: I'll respond if other people agree that it can't be interpreted in that way, otherwise your wrong. screw it just to get this out of the way: + Show Spoiler + On March 24 2010 03:30 Fishball wrote: To me, the tone OpZ used gives me the impression that he has the power to nuke. Doesn't feel scummy to me at this point of the game though. If you're Mafia, that would be a dumb way to get unwanted attention. Firstly you are quoting me, so when you wrote "If you're Mafia", I took it to be me. Think the misinterpretation lies in the word "that", I took it to refer to the post you quoted of mine//my voting and reasoning in voting for OpZ and not to what OpZ wrote. If you still can't understand how I could misinterpret it then I'm just going to give up and call you an idiot ^^ It wasn't referring to anyone. It was an assumption. Eg. If you're blind, driving a car would be asking for disaster If you're sick, you wouldn't want to go to school. So did I say that you ARE blind/sick? No. On March 24 2010 03:59 XeliN wrote: If you still can't understand how I could misinterpret it then I'm just going to give up and call you an idiot ^^ Oh I'm pretty sure there are many ways to misinterpret this, for different reasons. | ||
|
Fishball
Canada4788 Posts
On March 24 2010 08:51 Versatile wrote: ps: lmao @ nemy getting voted for in both games, haha. Well one has to be red, right? RIGHT? | ||
|
Fishball
Canada4788 Posts
Ironically, I don't like retaliation. Or do I? | ||
|
Fishball
Canada4788 Posts
On March 25 2010 03:31 Phrujbaz wrote: LOL is there a feature to be emailed if you get a pm? No, why don't you check the thread everyday instead? If you say you can't, why did you even bother signing up? | ||
|
Fishball
Canada4788 Posts
Took long enough for the first nuke to launch. | ||
|
Fishball
Canada4788 Posts
##Vote: RebirthofLegend | ||
|
Fishball
Canada4788 Posts
On March 25 2010 11:46 Bill Murray wrote: You just argued against his lynch... If he's red, and you're not, then way to go, buddy. I'm back at my house. I will be gradually checking this to see what the plans are. Now that Caller has stated that he has no anti-nuclear-devices, where does that leave us? It would be nice to know who has Nukes and who has Anti-Nukes, are we allowed to share that information? It would benefit the town. If not allowed to do it, at least use this: Guaranteed countries with nukes: The Big Five: 1. Usa, 2. Russia, 3. France, 4. UK, 5. China The Nuclear Riff-Raff: (those not signing the NTBT or Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty) 6. India 7. Pakistan 8. North Korea Undeclared Nuclear Power 9. Israel I am not sure if there will only be 9 with nukes, but that is my assumption. It could include a nation like Iran. Already clarified with Ace. Certain real world "facts" are not related to this game. Which means USA/Russia might or might NOT have nukes. | ||
|
Fishball
Canada4788 Posts
Hell, Zimbabwe might have Nukes if this country is in the game. | ||
|
Fishball
Canada4788 Posts
On March 25 2010 12:03 Abenson wrote: Regarding the RoL-nuking-Caller situation, I think it best that we let Caller explain his thoughts on the whole thing first. Give him a chance to defend himself and propose why we someone with an anti-nuke should save him. Also, giving him a chance to talk may reveal things later on if he is mafia. He already explained his thoughts. Well, sort of. | ||
|
Fishball
Canada4788 Posts
On March 25 2010 12:33 Ace wrote: if Fishball dies. | ||
|
Fishball
Canada4788 Posts
On March 25 2010 12:29 Zona wrote: We need to get a majority vote on RoL as soon as possible, in case an anti-nuke is launched! If an anti-nuke is launched the day may end earlier than the 24 hour extension we expect to get, and if we don't have a majority vote, we will end up no lynching! Are you saying you're in a position to be able to make use of the extra 24 hours? | ||
|
Fishball
Canada4788 Posts
On March 25 2010 14:10 ~OpZ~ wrote: I'm a mason. I can talk outside the thread with Abenson. I'm not sure if I can post what me and him talk about. If the rules on the first page doesn't say, then you can. | ||
|
Fishball
Canada4788 Posts
Keep in mind Mafia can have anti-missile powers too. | ||
| ||
