|
I already considered Tree.hugger Johnnyspazz and Dozko as being prime suspects for Mafia, well Tree and Johnny, Dozko is more of a certainty.
I am very curious to hear Cresentia and Laaan's deeper explanation to their votes. I very much do not suspect Laaan and am suprised he voted Softer, cresentia I am more suspicious of.
Before this i posted a link to my friend of the 7 suspects I would choose, at a push, to be Mafia
ShoCkey
Dozko
Quickstriker
Haster
~OpZ~
Jonnyspazz
Tree.Hugger
Haster is dubious, all he is done is somewhat irrationally voted for me and given some of my posts its more than possible he could have just got the wrong idea and believed I am Mafia. As such Cresentia could be the substitute for Haster.
For the love of god can we plz Lynch one of these next round, if we go one more time with lynching a Townie this game is completely lost, as of now it is barely salvagable.
|
The next obvious target, although they could choose from many, for the Mafia to try to get lynched would be Royw, look out for this, some of them have already tried to associate "clues" with him if you are a Townie I urge you not to vote for him.
|
what does it mean by softer changed colors? o:
Softer was not my first choice of who to kill, but at the moment I thought he was more likely then quickstriker, Xelin, or johnnyspazz
|
and btw my name is spelt ian not Lan
|
On January 26 2010 08:26 Iaaan wrote:
what does it mean by softer changed colors? o:
Softer was not my first choice of who to kill, but at the moment I thought he was more likely then quickstriker, Xelin, or johnnyspazz
it's a description of being hanged (your head turns blue/black from lack of oxygen)
Actually, my reasoning is actually about the same as Iaaan's; none of the current candidates were who I'd like to lynch, and so I decided to vote for someone for who it seemed possible AND to prevent any sort of other last-minute switches from overtaking it. I was 50-50 on Jonoman/Roy after someone had posted the technical-drawing clues, but in the end I felt like my vote was simply being wasted, so I went back to my original plan.
|
Bad turn of events, but to be honest the guy only had 1-2 posts in the thread so its not like he was an asset plus he had a good clue to his name IMO.
I guess now we should pay attention only to the way someone is killed, seeing how BC gave out all real clues in there in previous games.
|
damn its a shame we lynched another non-mafia, i was pretty sure softer was mafia too
|
On January 26 2010 09:35 johnnyspazz wrote:
damn its a shame we lynched another non-mafia, i was pretty sure softer was mafia too
Well it just brings us closer to a mafia.
|
we get more clues next right?
|
On January 26 2010 11:20 johnnyspazz wrote:
we get more clues next right?
Yea in day 3.
|
can't wait, im going to try and prove my innocence with the next set of clues
just you haters wait
|
Philadelphia, PA10406 Posts
On January 26 2010 11:59 johnnyspazz wrote:
can't wait, im going to try and prove my innocence with the next set of clues
just you haters wait
You only have to prove your innocence if you're mafia. Spend your time finding good clues and making good arguments, and you won't have to worry about falling under suspicion.
|
During lunch break today, I was checking the voting thread and noticed tree.hugger has placed his vote on softer, and it was very close to the dead line.
In his previous post, he said:
On January 25 2010 12:40 tree.hugger wrote:
With three votes, I have tried to be cautious with this responsibility. I'm going to wait till tomorrow afternoon before I leave for class to make my vote, and I will post my reasoning for it as well. With the voting as spread out and close as it is now, whoever I vote for will almost inevitably be the person lynched, and therefore, I will be as patient as a I need to be in order to make the most rational decision. Hopefully I pick right.
I am unsure of whether I support an immediate double lynch, although I don't believe my influence is as heavy on that issue. Is using the double lynch common on the second day of voting? Is it usually successful? I'm not entirely sure that using this power is best spent on an early day, while more clues may be available at a later date. Using this power shows confidence in our guesses that I'm not 100% sure we deserve to have.
So I reserve both my votes. I'll make a choice tomorrow.
At the time, QS already had 5 votes on him. With tree.hugger's vote on softer, it brings softer's count up to 5 as well. Still, QS would have been lynched as he was the first one to 5.
But what would be the point of doing so, voting at such a late time, with a high probability of the target not being lynched? I decided to abstain my vote from QS and let it play out; Turns out this was unnecessary as Iaaan and d3_crescentia both voted softer at the last minute.
This scenario just seems a bit odd to me. Also, softer never really had any solid clues related to him.
|
FREEAGLELAND26780 Posts
91! 
Also yay I'm a star. Proving innocence in epic ways is pretty cool.
|
On January 26 2010 14:54 Fishball wrote:
During lunch break today, I was checking the voting thread and noticed tree.hugger has placed his vote on softer, and it was very close to the dead line.
In his previous post, he said:
At the time, QS already had 5 votes on him. With tree.hugger's vote on softer, it brings softer's count up to 5 as well. Still, QS would have been lynched as he was the first one to 5.
But what would be the point of doing so, voting at such a late time, with a high probability of the target not being lynched? I decided to abstain my vote from QS and let it play out; Turns out this was unnecessary as Iaaan and d3_crescentia both voted softer at the last minute.
This scenario just seems a bit odd to me. Also, softer never really had any solid clues related to him.
Who do you think we had solid clues on, in your opinion?
|
On January 26 2010 23:35 dozko wrote:Show nested quote +On January 26 2010 14:54 Fishball wrote:
During lunch break today, I was checking the voting thread and noticed tree.hugger has placed his vote on softer, and it was very close to the dead line.
In his previous post, he said:
At the time, QS already had 5 votes on him. With tree.hugger's vote on softer, it brings softer's count up to 5 as well. Still, QS would have been lynched as he was the first one to 5.
But what would be the point of doing so, voting at such a late time, with a high probability of the target not being lynched? I decided to abstain my vote from QS and let it play out; Turns out this was unnecessary as Iaaan and d3_crescentia both voted softer at the last minute.
This scenario just seems a bit odd to me. Also, softer never really had any solid clues related to him.
Who do you think we had solid clues on, in your opinion?
Sorry, I think I should reword my phrase and not use the word "solid", but I hope you get my point.
I think there were better candidates that we have discussed over the past couple days. The "Tenderly embrace" clue in Day 1 was the only linkage people thought that could have led to softer. It isn't even a direct clue (as in describing a certain mafia of their actions, appearance etc.).
tree.hugger pm'd me the following.
... my intention was to put another plausible candidate up, because I just wasn't ready to lynch QS. This was my mistake, but I figured that by tying the two, there might be a little more discussion over the options. I was not willing to either put QS away, or put someone else randomly ahead of him.
There was a bit on Day1 that may have implied softer, and I thought it was worth a bet.
I should've been more decisive, I think.
Which means he at least thinks softer was a "plausible" candidate. But given the clues so far, if one is not willing to put QS away, why pick a lesser target and put him as a "plausible" candidate?
Why would Iaaan and d3_crescentia CHANGE their vote to softer at the last moment? Something just doesn't seem to add up here.
EDIT: TYPO
|
I edited my post within a minute, typo...
|
Oh i died.. Just as well i suppose, really sorry about going inactive, RL hit me in the face..
GL town, go get them.
|
On January 27 2010 00:24 softer wrote:
Oh i died.. Just as well i suppose, really sorry about going inactive, RL hit me in the face..
GL town, go get them.
Sorry man. =(
I had very severe doubts that the most popular candidates at the time were mafia. I changed my vote as to prevent the softer vote from being contested - simply because at the very least it wouldn't have been a very big loss for us if he turned out to be town-aligned.
|
The the next lynch I propose Tree.Hugger, He has shown through his votes and also some of his postings that he is likely to be Mafia. He gets 3 votes each lynch and the longer this game goes on with him in that position we are going to have a far more difficult time of actually lynching Mafia. I consider Quickstriker and Dozko certainly more obviously Mafia but they have far less influence over this game.
With Tree.Hugger out of the picture we can actually stand a chance of our votes meaning something and the Mafia may not be able to just outvote us each occasion as shown most obviously by the Softer lynch last.
Tree.Hugger is my pick for lynch
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
